It isn't going to happen on a national stage. The Right Wing is unable to carry out that dialogue in their media.
The Right Wing dialogue is about blame. Finding fault and blaming the political standard that does not suit them.
The Right uses 'absolute' difference to define their politics. Their constituents have to have a clear choice. Their current dialogue doesn't work for them. They lose every battle they start including the abortion issues, yet they do it anyway.
Extreme opposites don't have a resolve to understand, they only resolve to be different. The agenda of the Right is Old World. Carbon fuels, no government, self-righteous religious dogma, human rights abuses. Being willing to call an immigrant a donkey is fairly bad news with a political climate steeped in diversity and acceptance.
The Right Wing seeks to corrupt to win elections. The reason the US House has a majority is because of gerrymandering, not because of elections that are actually functioning. So, why bother to seek outreach or consensus? It won't work. Sadly, it won't work.
Trying to embarrass the Right by bringing their ignorance and social lethargy to the attention of the nation isn't going to achieve any goal here. The more one brings their image to a national platform the more extreme the dialogue becomes. I have friends and family involved with Right Wing ideology and they do not have an open mind no matter the logic of my statements. Even pandering to their point of view in seeking to solicit a reasonable response results in no willingness to belong to a dialogue.
Fear of what might come of their own liberties, their own person, their treasures have them corralled into a corner they will defend. It is amazing. People I normally enjoy and seek as company on other issues won't budge on topics related to their politics at all. Fear. They believe they have a footing for the future and they won't come out of that corner no matter the personal connection. They are so focused on the intent of their dialogue they are afraid of losing the dialogue to venture a toe into new waters. Amazing. Fully indoctrinated is how I would describe it. Completely propagandized. Won't even entertain me at all. Completely closed off to any dialogue no matter the basis of the truth.
President Obama is correct. It has to be spiritual. It has to be deeply moral and it has to involve a sense of self. When they realize they are safe to accept the reality and truth of JUSTICE in a way that provides for mutual respect and admiration, then and only then will they move into any area of the mainstream.
Cultures can be that way. The Right Wing Culture is mired in their own right of passage. There in lies the issue in all sincerity.
Right of passage is very American on a cultural level. It is where our national parades exist, where we respect our war dead, where ethnic traditions take place. The USA is very accepting of "Right of Passage." Diversity. We accept difference of others respectfully. We admire the same strengths we have as Americans. Right of passage is a tough one to rattle loose.
Rituals. The intangible. Spirituality. It is all part of the Right of Passage Americans cling to. It is the baseline of morality. "If I change my thinking can I still have my religion, my guns, my affirmation of my deeply vested self?"
The dialogue we all need to have is as President Obama stated, "Self-reflection." Can we as Americans 'catch ourselves' being our own obstructionists to a just and safe society? Are we willing to trip over antiquated values and deeply held beliefs to realize where it is wrong? How it effects others in a way that detrimental? Can we change what we seek in our media? Can we assert 'new speech' without alienating others.
One of my family members stated it me, "That is NEW SPEAK." I was confused with that statement and said, "News speak?" They stated, "No, new speak." I said that is colloquialism. There is now such thing as New Speak. Either we communicate in a way that is defined in our common language or we simply disagree. "NO, NO, NO, that is new speak." I was astounded that the level of my words hit at such a profound level it was redefined as dangerous to communication at all.
North Carolina. No communication about issues of the soul whatsoever at all. None allowed. Fear of losing oneself and the worth accumulated at social levels and within power structures is a very difficult hurdle. "In your face will only estrange and postpone any hope for future reconciliation of our differences in this country."
I won't even ask for a definition of 'new speak.' It is a hideous paradigm that does not deserve recognition. People are sequestered into their own 'hate of other' and there is a power structure that supports it.
These profound changes will occur only when 'the self' finds no more purpose in the belief. Look, the right wing takes media events and creates estranged fantasy out of them. How do we get past the hideous nature of weird paradigms. It serves the power structure to maintain control.
I have an example. Let me gather it. See Above Three Entries.
The Right Wing dialogue is about blame. Finding fault and blaming the political standard that does not suit them.
The Right uses 'absolute' difference to define their politics. Their constituents have to have a clear choice. Their current dialogue doesn't work for them. They lose every battle they start including the abortion issues, yet they do it anyway.
Extreme opposites don't have a resolve to understand, they only resolve to be different. The agenda of the Right is Old World. Carbon fuels, no government, self-righteous religious dogma, human rights abuses. Being willing to call an immigrant a donkey is fairly bad news with a political climate steeped in diversity and acceptance.
The Right Wing seeks to corrupt to win elections. The reason the US House has a majority is because of gerrymandering, not because of elections that are actually functioning. So, why bother to seek outreach or consensus? It won't work. Sadly, it won't work.
Trying to embarrass the Right by bringing their ignorance and social lethargy to the attention of the nation isn't going to achieve any goal here. The more one brings their image to a national platform the more extreme the dialogue becomes. I have friends and family involved with Right Wing ideology and they do not have an open mind no matter the logic of my statements. Even pandering to their point of view in seeking to solicit a reasonable response results in no willingness to belong to a dialogue.
Fear of what might come of their own liberties, their own person, their treasures have them corralled into a corner they will defend. It is amazing. People I normally enjoy and seek as company on other issues won't budge on topics related to their politics at all. Fear. They believe they have a footing for the future and they won't come out of that corner no matter the personal connection. They are so focused on the intent of their dialogue they are afraid of losing the dialogue to venture a toe into new waters. Amazing. Fully indoctrinated is how I would describe it. Completely propagandized. Won't even entertain me at all. Completely closed off to any dialogue no matter the basis of the truth.
President Obama is correct. It has to be spiritual. It has to be deeply moral and it has to involve a sense of self. When they realize they are safe to accept the reality and truth of JUSTICE in a way that provides for mutual respect and admiration, then and only then will they move into any area of the mainstream.
Cultures can be that way. The Right Wing Culture is mired in their own right of passage. There in lies the issue in all sincerity.
Right of passage is very American on a cultural level. It is where our national parades exist, where we respect our war dead, where ethnic traditions take place. The USA is very accepting of "Right of Passage." Diversity. We accept difference of others respectfully. We admire the same strengths we have as Americans. Right of passage is a tough one to rattle loose.
Rituals. The intangible. Spirituality. It is all part of the Right of Passage Americans cling to. It is the baseline of morality. "If I change my thinking can I still have my religion, my guns, my affirmation of my deeply vested self?"
The dialogue we all need to have is as President Obama stated, "Self-reflection." Can we as Americans 'catch ourselves' being our own obstructionists to a just and safe society? Are we willing to trip over antiquated values and deeply held beliefs to realize where it is wrong? How it effects others in a way that detrimental? Can we change what we seek in our media? Can we assert 'new speech' without alienating others.
One of my family members stated it me, "That is NEW SPEAK." I was confused with that statement and said, "News speak?" They stated, "No, new speak." I said that is colloquialism. There is now such thing as New Speak. Either we communicate in a way that is defined in our common language or we simply disagree. "NO, NO, NO, that is new speak." I was astounded that the level of my words hit at such a profound level it was redefined as dangerous to communication at all.
North Carolina. No communication about issues of the soul whatsoever at all. None allowed. Fear of losing oneself and the worth accumulated at social levels and within power structures is a very difficult hurdle. "In your face will only estrange and postpone any hope for future reconciliation of our differences in this country."
I won't even ask for a definition of 'new speak.' It is a hideous paradigm that does not deserve recognition. People are sequestered into their own 'hate of other' and there is a power structure that supports it.
These profound changes will occur only when 'the self' finds no more purpose in the belief. Look, the right wing takes media events and creates estranged fantasy out of them. How do we get past the hideous nature of weird paradigms. It serves the power structure to maintain control.
I have an example. Let me gather it. See Above Three Entries.
