There can't be that much difference between what is stated by a witness. There can be some inconsistencies over time that is reasonable, but, the reaction of the witness alone is one of alarm to what the defense attorney is stating she said before.
My opinion is the this trial session should be adjourned until there are official transcripts ordered by the judge. Those transcripts need to be obtained from reliable sources the court determines accurate. At this point I think the transcripts are being tampered with and too inconsistent to be reliable in the trial.
The reason this is a hurdle is because the defense is attempting to make the witness appear to be unreliable and lying. There is something wrong here and it isn't entirely the witness that has the problem. I speculate the defense council is toying with the jury to manipulate their ability to discern facts from implied facts. This confusion with the witness is engineered. She is being taken advantage of in her naivety.
