Since the DOJ has gone rouge, under what statute is an investigation provided?

The federal government has no right to interfere. Under what directive of the law is the DOJ pursuing an empty investigation?

The U.S. Department of Justice (click here) pushed Friday for a court order to isolate certain Alaska ballots to investigate potential voter confusion, while federal officials confirmed the existence of a criminal probe over a Senate candidate who shares a name with the Republican incumbent.

The dueling developments came days before Tuesday's ranked choice general election, in a race headlined by two-term Republican Sen. Dan Sullivan and Democratic former U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola. The race is among a handful nationwide expected to determine control of the Senate.

Alaska U.S. Attorney Michael Heyman told reporters in Anchorage that the investigation has been ongoing for several months, but recent revelations from The New York Times that Peltola's campaign appeared to be involved in recruiting retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan have resulted in a "significant surge of law enforcement assets to Alaska."...

Trump is the problem, not anyone else. It is all propaganda and noise making in order to derail a victory by a very deserving candidate. Trump won't admit there are many Republicans that simply aren't happy with the way the current majority in Congress and this president is taking the country. I am not surprised the other Candidate Sullivan is running as a Republican alternative.

THERE ARE NO CRIMES IN THE ALASKAN PRIMARY. The only problem is Trump's racketeering. If the State of Alaska wants to address Trump's scheme that has brevity to the Rule of Law. The Democrats should pursue justice to end Trump's harassment of the electorate. No advertising, no money flowing into the racketeering organization. Enough of this mess. 

The Republicans in Alaska have an alternative to the corrupt Republican party.

October 27, 2026

By Billy Witz

The State of Alaska (click here) has asked a federal court to dismiss a Trump administration lawsuit that seeks to block certification of its Senate race if the Republican incumbent loses by a narrow margin.

The motion Monday came in response to the Justice Department’s complaint last week arguing that confusion over a candidate on the ballot with a name similar to that of the incumbent Republican, Senator Dan S. Sullivan, could taint the election result.

In its filing, the state detailed its moves to ensure that voters know the difference between Senator Sullivan and Daniel J. Sullivan, a retired teacher and political novice who Republicans have argued was planted on the ballot by Democrats to siphon votes from the incumbent.

The second Mr. Sullivan has said that he is not trying to trick voters but is simply running as a Republican dissatisfied with the incumbent....