I hear there was a mistake made during an editing process regarding Donald Trump.
Do not cower from this assault against free speech. Donald has his own media. Does the BBC realize how it can expose him for what he is while knowing he is a propagandist and autocrat wannabe?
I apologize if this analogy offends anyone, but, isn’t Trump’s lawsuit like the pot calling the kettle black? This could actually be a lot of fun. I mean the Brits are known for taking on subjects straight up. To that end doesn’t an editor have to know the media’s viewership and readership?
Kindly keep in mind, Trump only carries the name as president. In actuality he is a criminal and continuing racketeer crime boss.. I can see how some editing would be designed as a caution knowing the dangers that lurk in embracing his alternate reality/universe.
I don’t have a problem with the BBC. In the USA it’s justified as infotainment. Basically, lying to manipulate the market focus and effecting the emotional response. Follow?
I actually believe Trump has no right to sue, first as a political figure and the fact he is a worse propagandist than Putin. T he r BBC needs to stand it’s ground. We need you and the strength of the media’s arguments.
