Israel would be really stupid to start a war with Russia.
Israel's defence minister signals that its military is prepared to strike shipments of advanced Russian weapons to Syria. (click here)
Let's just take the position that Russia is not interested in the escalation of war. Let's just say Russia wants to be the peace broker for Syria. Let's just say no one else, besides Secretary Kerry and President Obama are interested in brokering peace. Let's just do that. Does it change the perspective and why Neocons like McCain side with the aggressions of Israel.
Now, let take it one more step further. There is a 'greed initiative' and a 'peace initiative.' Which do you want? Let's look at the peace initiative first. Did I make it clear there is a CHOICE there. There is a choice. It is a choice between the greed or the peace.
The USA has allies. One is the UK. The other is Israel. Israel knows the USA stands shoulder to shoulder with them. The question is will the peace initiative by Secretary Kerry, President Obama and Russia ever have a chance. Right now, Israel, the UK and McCain are leveraging against the peace initiative. They don't want it. They want war. War makes all the USA allies feel safe. The USA and it's allies ACCEPTS the idea that when they enter into these wars there will be terror attacks within their countries. War kills soldiers and civilians. Just that simple. They have to accept that paradigm because that is the truth. They may live in denial of it and denial of it to the public, but, that is the truth.
This paradigm of war brings domestic terrorist attacks with it so there are two fronts to these wars, the foreign front and the domestic front. President Obama accepts the fact the more the USA escalates war abroad there will be more war to wage. There will be more war to wage abroad and domestically.
Fact. The question is does the peace initiative have any clout in the world. It would not seem to be when it comes to USA allies. Therefore, the question arises does the USA allow allies to put it into nuclear war because they feel better at war than when at peace.
There is a fine line here the Neocons, including Cameron in the UK and the authorities in Israel are about to cross. The USA is not interested in crossing into a war with Russia that would be initially conventional and ultimately nuclear. The USA wants this aggressive stance to end. The USA believes that peace with Russia leading Syria is possible. The entire idea that peace is not a thought by Israel and the UK is hideous. Completely hideous, but, they don't care.
Now, the real question when it comes to the USA is how do we lead with the UK and Israel entering into a dangerous paradigm with Russia. Make no doubt about it, when Russia convoys or shipments are destroyed by Israel, Russia will not simply be frustrated. There are already talks proceeding in earnest by the USA to end this mess in Syria. There is a lot more on the line than the UK and Israel. There is at the very least Turkey and Jordan, not to mention the Arab nations such as Saudi Arabia.
I think when it comes to the tough stance of Israel is it more about Iran than Syria. If Israel enters a war with Syria there are excuses there to "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran."
Israel also sees an aggression against Hezbollah. If Israel could end the existence with Hezbollah and Hamas it would. That is not realistic by a country that manifested to secure a safe homeland for the Hebrews. Israel needs to reflect on what they are about to do. Just because Russia is holding the Olympics does not mean they are going to be walked on by the UK and Israel. Quite the contrary. Russia is dealing in earnest toward peace and the UK and Israel will take on the identity of the bad guys in the face of peace.
Russia is left with how do you stop the bozos in the UK and Israel from being this stupid. So, Russia has the methods, the will and the CAPABILITIES to at the very least EMBARRASS the UK and Israel and at the very most front a complete military opposition. Fact. Russia is not a minor Middle East player. Russia has spent the past decade, the Bush decade, building relationships in the Middle East including with Israel. In many ways, Russia is tired of the The West rolling out The Evil Empire identity every time they get that 'I am scared skinny we are going to die if we don't go to war now.'
So, the facts are now obvious. The USA and Russia are in earnest negotiations to bring a peace to Syria which is welcome by the nations of the Middle East, including USA allies Turkey and Jordan. Israel and the UK have a long way to go to justify their knee jerk reaction to this by sending more arms into Syria. Israel and the UK are in complete contradiction to peace.
Why?
How about a shrinking USA Military Industrial Complex. Does that sound like 'a reason?' I think it does, hence, the greed initiative. I don't have to explain the obvious nature of this trip by McCain. An American hero goes to Syria and appears to know more about the circumstances there than anyone on Earth. NOT.
The greed initiative is viewed as a vital component of nations like the UK and Israel. They purchase munitions from the USA and if the USA Industrial Complex shrinks, they are scared they won't have state of the art national defense.
US Defense Companies Go On Overseas Offensive (click here)
May 15, 2013
by Jane Wells
...Raytheon: "International continues to be a key differentiator for the company. In Q1, our international business represented 26 percent of our total sales."
Lockheed Martin: "We are on a path to grow international sales from approximately 17 percent of total revenues last year to at least 20 percent in the next few years."
Alliant Techsystems: "We have opened international offices with what I call 'feet on the street.'"...
Israel just signed an extensive military agreement with the USA to purchase its technology. Ten years I believe. No reason not to. Israel has a right to its own defense and the USA is happy to be that partner.
The UK is always a compromised partner to the USA. NATO is a vital component to the EU. It is why President Obama has encouraged a more autonomous stance for Europe. But, nations like the UK don't have enough troops to support a real war, the USA has lots of people to send to war in comparison to its allies. Given that, there is a 'war dependency' by the nations of Europe. They simply can't mount a convention war by themselves. It leaves Europe with drastic national defenses and we can't allow that. But, we also can't allow the UK to make bad choices when so much is on the line.
The USA is standing down from a war lasting a decade in Iraq. Iraq is currently in civil war. The Iraq civil war is different than that of Syria. Iraq is splitting up. Syria is changing its government and the rebels current best option is a shared government through a peace initiative. A peace agreement would bring about humanitarian aid, safety to the citizens of Syria, a return of refugees and a future of shared hope. It would stabilize the region rather than further destabilization.
The UK and Israel need to come to terms with their national security while peace initiatives are proceeding. The UK and Israel have an obligation to allow these attempts by the USA to end war, save lives and stabilize a region in chronic political changes. They have an obligation to Russia as well where treaties demand it.
All this war rant, to me, is more about politics than actual war. There is also nothing saying the Syria rebels are safe and their people safe. So there is a argument to arm them in DEFENSE of themselves while such peace initiatives go forward. But, there should not be overwhelming arms that will escalate war.
Why would Russia send in anti-aircraft missiles? I think that is obvious. "No Fly Zone" - Saddam Hussein - It is important for Assad to go forward to peace talks. Posturing.
Now, the question is will peace be given a chance at all. It should. It is the answer for the region as well as the people of Syria. But, will the Neocons, both domestic and international, view this plan by President Obama as a good plan. Hell, no.
Israel's defence minister signals that its military is prepared to strike shipments of advanced Russian weapons to Syria. (click here)
Let's just take the position that Russia is not interested in the escalation of war. Let's just say Russia wants to be the peace broker for Syria. Let's just say no one else, besides Secretary Kerry and President Obama are interested in brokering peace. Let's just do that. Does it change the perspective and why Neocons like McCain side with the aggressions of Israel.
Now, let take it one more step further. There is a 'greed initiative' and a 'peace initiative.' Which do you want? Let's look at the peace initiative first. Did I make it clear there is a CHOICE there. There is a choice. It is a choice between the greed or the peace.
The USA has allies. One is the UK. The other is Israel. Israel knows the USA stands shoulder to shoulder with them. The question is will the peace initiative by Secretary Kerry, President Obama and Russia ever have a chance. Right now, Israel, the UK and McCain are leveraging against the peace initiative. They don't want it. They want war. War makes all the USA allies feel safe. The USA and it's allies ACCEPTS the idea that when they enter into these wars there will be terror attacks within their countries. War kills soldiers and civilians. Just that simple. They have to accept that paradigm because that is the truth. They may live in denial of it and denial of it to the public, but, that is the truth.
This paradigm of war brings domestic terrorist attacks with it so there are two fronts to these wars, the foreign front and the domestic front. President Obama accepts the fact the more the USA escalates war abroad there will be more war to wage. There will be more war to wage abroad and domestically.
Fact. The question is does the peace initiative have any clout in the world. It would not seem to be when it comes to USA allies. Therefore, the question arises does the USA allow allies to put it into nuclear war because they feel better at war than when at peace.
There is a fine line here the Neocons, including Cameron in the UK and the authorities in Israel are about to cross. The USA is not interested in crossing into a war with Russia that would be initially conventional and ultimately nuclear. The USA wants this aggressive stance to end. The USA believes that peace with Russia leading Syria is possible. The entire idea that peace is not a thought by Israel and the UK is hideous. Completely hideous, but, they don't care.
Now, the real question when it comes to the USA is how do we lead with the UK and Israel entering into a dangerous paradigm with Russia. Make no doubt about it, when Russia convoys or shipments are destroyed by Israel, Russia will not simply be frustrated. There are already talks proceeding in earnest by the USA to end this mess in Syria. There is a lot more on the line than the UK and Israel. There is at the very least Turkey and Jordan, not to mention the Arab nations such as Saudi Arabia.
I think when it comes to the tough stance of Israel is it more about Iran than Syria. If Israel enters a war with Syria there are excuses there to "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran."
Israel also sees an aggression against Hezbollah. If Israel could end the existence with Hezbollah and Hamas it would. That is not realistic by a country that manifested to secure a safe homeland for the Hebrews. Israel needs to reflect on what they are about to do. Just because Russia is holding the Olympics does not mean they are going to be walked on by the UK and Israel. Quite the contrary. Russia is dealing in earnest toward peace and the UK and Israel will take on the identity of the bad guys in the face of peace.
Russia is left with how do you stop the bozos in the UK and Israel from being this stupid. So, Russia has the methods, the will and the CAPABILITIES to at the very least EMBARRASS the UK and Israel and at the very most front a complete military opposition. Fact. Russia is not a minor Middle East player. Russia has spent the past decade, the Bush decade, building relationships in the Middle East including with Israel. In many ways, Russia is tired of the The West rolling out The Evil Empire identity every time they get that 'I am scared skinny we are going to die if we don't go to war now.'
So, the facts are now obvious. The USA and Russia are in earnest negotiations to bring a peace to Syria which is welcome by the nations of the Middle East, including USA allies Turkey and Jordan. Israel and the UK have a long way to go to justify their knee jerk reaction to this by sending more arms into Syria. Israel and the UK are in complete contradiction to peace.
Why?
How about a shrinking USA Military Industrial Complex. Does that sound like 'a reason?' I think it does, hence, the greed initiative. I don't have to explain the obvious nature of this trip by McCain. An American hero goes to Syria and appears to know more about the circumstances there than anyone on Earth. NOT.
The greed initiative is viewed as a vital component of nations like the UK and Israel. They purchase munitions from the USA and if the USA Industrial Complex shrinks, they are scared they won't have state of the art national defense.
US Defense Companies Go On Overseas Offensive (click here)
May 15, 2013
by Jane Wells
...Raytheon: "International continues to be a key differentiator for the company. In Q1, our international business represented 26 percent of our total sales."
Lockheed Martin: "We are on a path to grow international sales from approximately 17 percent of total revenues last year to at least 20 percent in the next few years."
Alliant Techsystems: "We have opened international offices with what I call 'feet on the street.'"...
The Greed Initiative is real, palpable and plays well to the culture of fear in The West. However, it is complete mind speak and nothing more. There is no real reason for the greed initiative by entering into war. It can exist in peace time as well as war. However, it is more important in federal spending when a war is being conducted that The West, especially 'in the neighborhood' of the Middle East and the EU likes to be on the offensive and not the defensive. It sells better politically.
Israel just signed an extensive military agreement with the USA to purchase its technology. Ten years I believe. No reason not to. Israel has a right to its own defense and the USA is happy to be that partner.
The UK is always a compromised partner to the USA. NATO is a vital component to the EU. It is why President Obama has encouraged a more autonomous stance for Europe. But, nations like the UK don't have enough troops to support a real war, the USA has lots of people to send to war in comparison to its allies. Given that, there is a 'war dependency' by the nations of Europe. They simply can't mount a convention war by themselves. It leaves Europe with drastic national defenses and we can't allow that. But, we also can't allow the UK to make bad choices when so much is on the line.
The USA is standing down from a war lasting a decade in Iraq. Iraq is currently in civil war. The Iraq civil war is different than that of Syria. Iraq is splitting up. Syria is changing its government and the rebels current best option is a shared government through a peace initiative. A peace agreement would bring about humanitarian aid, safety to the citizens of Syria, a return of refugees and a future of shared hope. It would stabilize the region rather than further destabilization.
The UK and Israel need to come to terms with their national security while peace initiatives are proceeding. The UK and Israel have an obligation to allow these attempts by the USA to end war, save lives and stabilize a region in chronic political changes. They have an obligation to Russia as well where treaties demand it.
All this war rant, to me, is more about politics than actual war. There is also nothing saying the Syria rebels are safe and their people safe. So there is a argument to arm them in DEFENSE of themselves while such peace initiatives go forward. But, there should not be overwhelming arms that will escalate war.
Why would Russia send in anti-aircraft missiles? I think that is obvious. "No Fly Zone" - Saddam Hussein - It is important for Assad to go forward to peace talks. Posturing.
Now, the question is will peace be given a chance at all. It should. It is the answer for the region as well as the people of Syria. But, will the Neocons, both domestic and international, view this plan by President Obama as a good plan. Hell, no.
