While the USA Neocons in the government and media have a problem with a sticky gas peddle there is the reality that as Syria loses it's governing infrastructure these releases are always a potential. Was the release actually an act of war, that has to be realized.
US Lacks evidence in accusing Syria of using chemical weapons (click here)
April 26, 2013
..."Thus far, we believe that the Assad regime maintains custody of these weapons, and this demonstrated a willingness to escalate its horrific use of violence against the Syrian people," Foreign Policy quotes from the letter.'''
The USA is not going to war because another dictator lost control of their nation!
The difference between Syria and Libya results from the the fact Libya was disarmed long before it's people rebelled against the government. The West had influence in Libya. That is not the case in Syria.
The fact Russia is not acting to end the suffering in Syria is why NATO has decided at this point to protect it's members, namely Turkey.
I kinda want to know why these issues of EXPERTISE are abandoned by the USA media for nothing but rhetorical stammering to bring political pressure in favor of war. Why is that? It isn't bad enough we have a bunch of politicians well vested into declaring war at every turn and now there is media seeking to leverage even more power to favor war.
What is really curious to me is that the media plays to their dopey unknowing persona. This way when the USA and NATO don't do as the Neocon politicians and media demands, they can claim the USA has turned CHICKEN and is now more a danger to the national security than under BUSH!
Go straight to hell.
There is nothing like a media that is more than willing to see American troops killed for ratings and political clout.
US Lacks evidence in accusing Syria of using chemical weapons (click here)
April 26, 2013
..."Thus far, we believe that the Assad regime maintains custody of these weapons, and this demonstrated a willingness to escalate its horrific use of violence against the Syrian people," Foreign Policy quotes from the letter.'''
The USA is not going to war because another dictator lost control of their nation!
The difference between Syria and Libya results from the the fact Libya was disarmed long before it's people rebelled against the government. The West had influence in Libya. That is not the case in Syria.
The fact Russia is not acting to end the suffering in Syria is why NATO has decided at this point to protect it's members, namely Turkey.
I kinda want to know why these issues of EXPERTISE are abandoned by the USA media for nothing but rhetorical stammering to bring political pressure in favor of war. Why is that? It isn't bad enough we have a bunch of politicians well vested into declaring war at every turn and now there is media seeking to leverage even more power to favor war.
What is really curious to me is that the media plays to their dopey unknowing persona. This way when the USA and NATO don't do as the Neocon politicians and media demands, they can claim the USA has turned CHICKEN and is now more a danger to the national security than under BUSH!
Go straight to hell.
There is nothing like a media that is more than willing to see American troops killed for ratings and political clout.
