Friday, April 19, 2013

Most of the terrorists at Beslan were Uzbeks. Beslan was organized by a Chechen warlord and stated to be in demands of an independent Chechen state/nation, but, most of those involved were actually Uzbeks.

This is where warlords are a sincere problem. They run their own wars. Riyad-us Saliheen was the Chechen warlord. As late as 2009 the rebel brigade was still active.

...Bobrovnikov (2005) (click here) argues that the scope and impact of the attack implemented by al-Riyad al-Salihin group can be compared to the 9/11 tragedy in the United States. Even though the prevalent opinion and explanation suggested by the official media reports was that the attack was a result of extremist Islamic beliefs, it seems that Beslan’s case is a bit more complex than a purely religion-based attack....

There is no stereotypical nature to any of this stuff. Each rebel group has its own experience, it's own members, it's own allies and enemies, their own financial base and their own standards. It is like a Super-gang. So the 'turf' is basically an unknown until there are demands by them for whatever violence they are carrying out or threatening.

Chechen rebel groups have nothing to do with what is going on in the USA. If that is the focus of the USA media, it is SELF-SERVING propaganda. This is about how at least one brother became estranged from a decent family in the USA.

Why is it President Putin is always assigned an evil task? Putin contacted Obama for condolences, sure, but also to offer cooperation. What a bunch of ignorant bastards these people are.


Why are it these two men and any of their accomplices only capable of having ties to Russia to be the impetus to the acts in Boston? An accent in their speech makes them anything but domestic terrorists? I don't think so. All of a sudden Americans are to virginal to be domestic terrorists. Well, get over it!

Let's try to LOGICALLY see what occurred with the older brother. He went to visit his parents in Russia, maybe to come home to Russia because he wasn't successful in the USA. So, they said to him, "Look at your brother. He is doing so well. You have been doing fine. Go back there an do something with your life." He made some emotional connections to his ethnic roots and two months later put a video online declaring he is the messiah of all evil in the world. Where have I heard that before? Columbine? Oklahoma City and the list goes on. 

Maybe, just maybe the Culture of Violence in the USA, the easy access to all kinds of violent material including guns added to the older brothers comfort in finding THE TRUE MEANING OF HIS LIFE. Is it too much to ask to actually BLAME the USA for these tragedies. Could it be the USA is it's own enemy in too many ways? Ya think?

If talking heads don't have something to say, they don't have a job. Suicide is NOT a unique sign of anything. Columbine involved suicide. Sandy Hook Elementary involved suicide. There is nothing unique here that points to al Qaeda. There is no claim by anyone internationally they are triumphant. It is nonsense.

Pakistan is not Russia. Russia has no al Qaeda training camps.

This is such bullshit. Where are my Harry Potter tapes?