She really needs to resign. She is not capable of handling the responsibilities without causing herself problems. The people need a competent person to work in this office.
She wasn't suppose to interfere with issuing of marriage licenses. Removing the documents to apply for the license and replacing them with her own creation is definitely interfering. She is playing with fire. She, once again, is in contempt of court.
Code Of Ethics (page 6 - bottom of page, continues on page 7)
...Each code must contain standards of conduct, financial disclosure requirements, a policy on nepotism, and the designation of a person or group to handle enforcement....
I am fairly sure she can be removed from office. Her conscience is not an authority of Christian charter. She can say the change in form will satisfy her conscience, but, she is not an authority on Christian conscience. Judge Bunning will enforce the state law that states a specific state department is responsible for issuing documents like the application for marriage. But, if her lawyer wants to say the new form will satisfy her conscience he'll fail. Every person is not an authority on the Christian conscience. They are an authority of their own conscience, but, a minister would have to make testimony to the soundness of the Christian conscience reflected in a document.
Removing her from office will be doing her a favor. She is unable to discern her job duties from her church affiliations. She needs to move on to do something else.
I wouldn't want to be her when she faces Judge Bunning again. She is even interfering in opposite sex marriages. This is crazy. I do believe she is in some major trouble this time.
402.100 (click here) Marriage license -- Marriage certificate -- Confidentiality of Social Security numbers. Each county clerk shall use the form prescribed by the Department for Libraries and Archives when issuing a marriage license. This form shall provide for the entering of all of the information required in this section, and may also provide for the entering of additional information prescribed by the Department for Libraries and Archives. The form shall consist of:
The state government needs to update their marriages laws. The statues regarding same sex marriage is out of date.
Ms. Davis cannot arbitrarily change the form.
...On Friday, (click here) Mason's attorney told the judge that when Davis returned to work Monday she "confiscated all the original forms" and replaced them with forms that delete her name, the name of the county and all references to the deputy clerks. The new form has Mason's name and a place for him to write his initials but not his signature.
"It also appears to this counsel those changes were made in some attempt to circumvent the court's orders and may have raised to the level of interference against the court's orders," attorney Richard Hughes wrote. "Mr. Mason is concerned because he is in a difficult position that he continues to issue the licenses per the court's order ... which had some remote questionable validity, but now with these changes may in fact have some substantial questions about validity."...
A marriage license is a legal document with sincerely serious statues to the rights of a husband or wife. This is not something that can be toyed with. If her substitution of the application won't hold up to legal standards, it might be invalid. Judge Bunning will have to decide the legal standing of the applications that have resulted in the issuance of a license. This is a very serious infraction by Ms. Davis. Now, I am worried.
An authority of the Christian conscience preaches to that fact at least once a week. She is not a valid authority on creating a form she approves of. I've heard of God asking for paperwork at the pearly gates.
If she'll go this far, I can't help but wonder what else is wrong in the office. The county clerk's office is responsible for assembling documents for the Grand Jury. She oversees voting and voting machines. I think all her duties need to be reviewed for any unauthorized activity.
She wasn't suppose to interfere with issuing of marriage licenses. Removing the documents to apply for the license and replacing them with her own creation is definitely interfering. She is playing with fire. She, once again, is in contempt of court.
Code Of Ethics (page 6 - bottom of page, continues on page 7)
...Each code must contain standards of conduct, financial disclosure requirements, a policy on nepotism, and the designation of a person or group to handle enforcement....
I am fairly sure she can be removed from office. Her conscience is not an authority of Christian charter. She can say the change in form will satisfy her conscience, but, she is not an authority on Christian conscience. Judge Bunning will enforce the state law that states a specific state department is responsible for issuing documents like the application for marriage. But, if her lawyer wants to say the new form will satisfy her conscience he'll fail. Every person is not an authority on the Christian conscience. They are an authority of their own conscience, but, a minister would have to make testimony to the soundness of the Christian conscience reflected in a document.
Removing her from office will be doing her a favor. She is unable to discern her job duties from her church affiliations. She needs to move on to do something else.
I wouldn't want to be her when she faces Judge Bunning again. She is even interfering in opposite sex marriages. This is crazy. I do believe she is in some major trouble this time.
402.100 (click here) Marriage license -- Marriage certificate -- Confidentiality of Social Security numbers. Each county clerk shall use the form prescribed by the Department for Libraries and Archives when issuing a marriage license. This form shall provide for the entering of all of the information required in this section, and may also provide for the entering of additional information prescribed by the Department for Libraries and Archives. The form shall consist of:
The state government needs to update their marriages laws. The statues regarding same sex marriage is out of date.
Ms. Davis cannot arbitrarily change the form.
September 19, 2015
By Adam Beam
...On Friday, (click here) Mason's attorney told the judge that when Davis returned to work Monday she "confiscated all the original forms" and replaced them with forms that delete her name, the name of the county and all references to the deputy clerks. The new form has Mason's name and a place for him to write his initials but not his signature.
"It also appears to this counsel those changes were made in some attempt to circumvent the court's orders and may have raised to the level of interference against the court's orders," attorney Richard Hughes wrote. "Mr. Mason is concerned because he is in a difficult position that he continues to issue the licenses per the court's order ... which had some remote questionable validity, but now with these changes may in fact have some substantial questions about validity."...
A marriage license is a legal document with sincerely serious statues to the rights of a husband or wife. This is not something that can be toyed with. If her substitution of the application won't hold up to legal standards, it might be invalid. Judge Bunning will have to decide the legal standing of the applications that have resulted in the issuance of a license. This is a very serious infraction by Ms. Davis. Now, I am worried.
An authority of the Christian conscience preaches to that fact at least once a week. She is not a valid authority on creating a form she approves of. I've heard of God asking for paperwork at the pearly gates.
If she'll go this far, I can't help but wonder what else is wrong in the office. The county clerk's office is responsible for assembling documents for the Grand Jury. She oversees voting and voting machines. I think all her duties need to be reviewed for any unauthorized activity.
