There was no reason to interjection the idea the American people have every reason to fear another batch of Muslim terrorists. They don't resist the sensationalism. It's nonsense. The organization that held the agitating attempt at religious art regarding Mohammad is the problem. They are a hate group and they got what they planned on. The Texas group hired additional security to protect them from their own destination.
So here we go with "talking heads" again that carry a message of sensationalism. War is such a great commodity for ratings. Doesn't matter if soldiers die or are maimed or the USA treasury is emptied for generations to come, if the ratings match the ambitions of the news media that is all that matters.
The problem with all this symbiotic relationship between sensationalism and radical hate groups in the USA is; where and when does it stop?
Let's see, let's have the KKK run another Mohammad meeting to declare he was a bigot. Why not do that?
And the 211 group can hold a hate meeting defaming Mohammad as an oppressor of Christianity.
And let all these events happen within a month of each other. Mimics. It happens. People mimic each other all the time. Great idea, isn't it? Let's get the American public really frenzied about Islamic terrorists living next door, right? Just like post 911. We really need that sentiment out there again.
The problem with media and backing of a hate mongering group as a legitimate aspect of American culture is that it cheapens the culture in the USA and provides a completely inappropriate platform for hate. The media is dead wrong about this and everyone who survived the two gunmen are lucky.
The hate of the Texas group bargained for what they got. The two gunman from Arizona that tweeted Daesh and stated they were defending Mohammad as if a mujaheddin warrior and bargained for what they got. But, the responding police officer never bargained for what he was faced with. I don't care how many police may have responded and whether or not they were wearing body armor or a SWAT team with armored Humvee; the police were the innocent pawns in a larger game that is a military response and not a police response.
I think everyone that evening was very lucky it didn't result in greater tragedy. But, hate groups that rely on the response of police to survive their own stupidity should be issued a violation of the law. The woman that heads up that hate group has been baiting Islamic men in the USA for a some time now and that baiting finally paid off. She wanted this and she wanted it because she wants to incite a public cry that would get louder and louder and finally loud enough to force President Obama to send the US military into Iraq and Syria. Hey. Ya know. It worked for Libya.
So here we go with "talking heads" again that carry a message of sensationalism. War is such a great commodity for ratings. Doesn't matter if soldiers die or are maimed or the USA treasury is emptied for generations to come, if the ratings match the ambitions of the news media that is all that matters.
The problem with all this symbiotic relationship between sensationalism and radical hate groups in the USA is; where and when does it stop?
Let's see, let's have the KKK run another Mohammad meeting to declare he was a bigot. Why not do that?
And the 211 group can hold a hate meeting defaming Mohammad as an oppressor of Christianity.
And let all these events happen within a month of each other. Mimics. It happens. People mimic each other all the time. Great idea, isn't it? Let's get the American public really frenzied about Islamic terrorists living next door, right? Just like post 911. We really need that sentiment out there again.
The problem with media and backing of a hate mongering group as a legitimate aspect of American culture is that it cheapens the culture in the USA and provides a completely inappropriate platform for hate. The media is dead wrong about this and everyone who survived the two gunmen are lucky.
The hate of the Texas group bargained for what they got. The two gunman from Arizona that tweeted Daesh and stated they were defending Mohammad as if a mujaheddin warrior and bargained for what they got. But, the responding police officer never bargained for what he was faced with. I don't care how many police may have responded and whether or not they were wearing body armor or a SWAT team with armored Humvee; the police were the innocent pawns in a larger game that is a military response and not a police response.
I think everyone that evening was very lucky it didn't result in greater tragedy. But, hate groups that rely on the response of police to survive their own stupidity should be issued a violation of the law. The woman that heads up that hate group has been baiting Islamic men in the USA for a some time now and that baiting finally paid off. She wanted this and she wanted it because she wants to incite a public cry that would get louder and louder and finally loud enough to force President Obama to send the US military into Iraq and Syria. Hey. Ya know. It worked for Libya.
