That is interesting dialogue from the Right Wing:
...She (the Attorney General) was very WEAK on gun laws.
...She is the voice of the President. So, when she spoke to the committee she was making the words of the President known.
A mindless woman leading the Justice Department. Perhaps that is the state of affairs of conservative women, ya think? They simply and mindlessly follow their Husbands voice and commands.
Who was it Shelby? That was amazing to hear.
And don't question Shelby. Don't be outraged at the idea of the AG being a mindless woman unable to discern the country's laws.
Shelby is god today. Bully for him.
Here is an interesting example:
February 14, 2015
The case was about money laundering. The actual members of the drug cartel were not part of the prosecution. But, did that stop Vitter from attempting to discredit Ms. Lynch. No, everything a political game in the committees of the House and Senate.
...She (the Attorney General) was very WEAK on gun laws.
...She is the voice of the President. So, when she spoke to the committee she was making the words of the President known.
A mindless woman leading the Justice Department. Perhaps that is the state of affairs of conservative women, ya think? They simply and mindlessly follow their Husbands voice and commands.
Who was it Shelby? That was amazing to hear.
And don't question Shelby. Don't be outraged at the idea of the AG being a mindless woman unable to discern the country's laws.
Shelby is god today. Bully for him.
Here is an interesting example:
February 14, 2015
......Lynch, (click here) the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, negotiated a settlement in December 2012 with HSBC bank employees who were accused of funneling millions of dollars to terrorist organizations and Mexican drug cartels.
Her decision to let them walk away without criminal prosecution sparked inquiry from Sen. David VItter, R-La., and a host of questions Friday.
Lynch, nominated by President Obama to replace Eric Holder as attorney general, is already facing a rocky reception in the Senate, which won’t vote on her confirmation until March at the earliest....
A Senator uses information about a prosecution of a financial institution to bring outrage to her nomination hearing. He never takes ownership of it except to raise political outrage.The case was about money laundering. The actual members of the drug cartel were not part of the prosecution. But, did that stop Vitter from attempting to discredit Ms. Lynch. No, everything a political game in the committees of the House and Senate.
