Anyone that wants to glamorize the devil and the hell he created is questionable in his own right. No matter the defense, I ain't buying it.
...Nearly 60 years later, (click title to entry - thank you) Murdoch is the head of a $33 billion media empire, the News Corporation, dominated by its holdings in television and film. Yet even though newspapers account for less than 17 percent of the company’s revenues, Murdoch still thinks of himself as a newspaperman. And there is still nothing more thrilling to him than a scoop by one of his papers — the more salacious, the better. How those stories are obtained has never been of much concern to him. In Murdoch’s mind, at least, it’s still life or death....
He turned a 168 year old newspaper into a scandal rag without ethics that operated above the law. There is nothing to say anymore, except, the archives will sell well at "Sotheby's" or "Christies."
The United States of America, Murdoch's preferred homeland, is either 235 years old or 228 years old depending on whether one recognizes the Treaty of Paris in 1783 as international communities do. "The News of the World" covered most of the USA's existence. THAT is meaningless? Allowing such history to be transformed into lawlessness is okay? I don't think so. Not where I was born and raised.
"He ain't Muslim is he?"
