Democrats across the spectrum look at the people in relationship to their choices when antiquated thinking Republicans are elected and shake their heads in amazment. That has not been truer in the year 2010.
Like what happened?
The election of the new RNC chair and the events in Wisconsin should be a real key for Democrats to 'get to know' the methodologies of the RNC.
If I may?
Imagine having the job of electing the plutocrats 'man in control.' After all do plutocrats like to make investments in unknown outcomes? Rarely.
What if there was a political party with guaranteed outcomes? So much so that nearly every election has the same set of values regarding the reality of the country. Wouldn't any plutocrat have the confidence in laying down monies on the outcome? And not only that but invest in their own messages to the electorate that will guarantee a 'value system' that is electable every election? What is better for a plutocrat with billions riding on the outcome of Wall Street everyday than guaranteed outcomes regardless of the apparent ricks, including bailouts guaranteed by fear in losing jobs and economic dynamics?
Not bad, huh?
That is what the RNC brings to the USA and why they win elections REGARDLESS of the facts or reality of the country. Quite literally, the 'mind think' of the USA revolves around them and why they have to master 'the message' and 'enforce it.
Today in Wisconsin is a State House and Governor unable to make concessions regardless of the demands of their electorate because of their allegience to the RNC outcomes they are suppose to guarantee.
The new RNC chair elected Republican majorities across the board in Wisconsin because his candidates were completely ineleastic in their 'belief systems' and would guarantee the outcomes of the election standard 'on election day.' The same phenomena is noted in the obstructionists in the Senate and the current House majority. They are UNABLE to lead because they simply don't know how to do anything except win elections and vote to guaranteed standards.
No, they didn't take a pledge or sign a commitment. That would be poison to their elections. What they did do was to 'commit' themselves to a value system that works to get them elected but not governor. Scott Walker is known for his inelastic policies and his rigid value systems for public policies. He is not a leader, he is a good poster boy.
The really scary part is that these people sincerely don't know how to lead, don't understand the dynamics of leadership and cause contraction in decision making when they are in majorities. Those contractions in decision making in a public venue guarantee the plutocrats their revenues. Go ahead and ask them if the country goes to hell in a handbasket so long as they have exactly what they bargained for in every election outcome. Go ahead. Ask them if they 'play to' a value system that is electable and consistent regardless the outcome to the country or a state or a constituency. Some of them are fast talkers, but, most of the time they simply see such questions as an opportunity to 'stay on message.'
In the USA, when it comes to being a Republican Candidate all you have to do is 'stay on message' no matter how bizarre that message might be.
It is hysterical to watch conservative commentators criticize the President and wonder why he 'went off message' or 'missed an opportunity to connect with voters.' They haven't got a clue as to what sincere leadership and critical decision making should look like. Perhaps they should begin to learn what a real leader is all about and how critical decisions are made when they observe the President, his cabinet and staff.
Like what happened?
The election of the new RNC chair and the events in Wisconsin should be a real key for Democrats to 'get to know' the methodologies of the RNC.
If I may?
Imagine having the job of electing the plutocrats 'man in control.' After all do plutocrats like to make investments in unknown outcomes? Rarely.
What if there was a political party with guaranteed outcomes? So much so that nearly every election has the same set of values regarding the reality of the country. Wouldn't any plutocrat have the confidence in laying down monies on the outcome? And not only that but invest in their own messages to the electorate that will guarantee a 'value system' that is electable every election? What is better for a plutocrat with billions riding on the outcome of Wall Street everyday than guaranteed outcomes regardless of the apparent ricks, including bailouts guaranteed by fear in losing jobs and economic dynamics?
Not bad, huh?
That is what the RNC brings to the USA and why they win elections REGARDLESS of the facts or reality of the country. Quite literally, the 'mind think' of the USA revolves around them and why they have to master 'the message' and 'enforce it.
Today in Wisconsin is a State House and Governor unable to make concessions regardless of the demands of their electorate because of their allegience to the RNC outcomes they are suppose to guarantee.
The new RNC chair elected Republican majorities across the board in Wisconsin because his candidates were completely ineleastic in their 'belief systems' and would guarantee the outcomes of the election standard 'on election day.' The same phenomena is noted in the obstructionists in the Senate and the current House majority. They are UNABLE to lead because they simply don't know how to do anything except win elections and vote to guaranteed standards.
No, they didn't take a pledge or sign a commitment. That would be poison to their elections. What they did do was to 'commit' themselves to a value system that works to get them elected but not governor. Scott Walker is known for his inelastic policies and his rigid value systems for public policies. He is not a leader, he is a good poster boy.
The really scary part is that these people sincerely don't know how to lead, don't understand the dynamics of leadership and cause contraction in decision making when they are in majorities. Those contractions in decision making in a public venue guarantee the plutocrats their revenues. Go ahead and ask them if the country goes to hell in a handbasket so long as they have exactly what they bargained for in every election outcome. Go ahead. Ask them if they 'play to' a value system that is electable and consistent regardless the outcome to the country or a state or a constituency. Some of them are fast talkers, but, most of the time they simply see such questions as an opportunity to 'stay on message.'
In the USA, when it comes to being a Republican Candidate all you have to do is 'stay on message' no matter how bizarre that message might be.
It is hysterical to watch conservative commentators criticize the President and wonder why he 'went off message' or 'missed an opportunity to connect with voters.' They haven't got a clue as to what sincere leadership and critical decision making should look like. Perhaps they should begin to learn what a real leader is all about and how critical decisions are made when they observe the President, his cabinet and staff.
Scott Walker is no more Presidential material than the Man in the Moon, but, every Republican across the country is seeking to 'play the tune' he dictates. One has to wonder if a Republican sincerely understands choice at all. Their beloved market place is supposed to be mired in all kinds of choices, but, that usually comes along with intense ad campaigns.
The democracy in Wisconsin is in the hands of fourteen Democrats that love their state, their people and the values of freedom and fiscal responsibility. Stand behind them, it is the only chance Wisconsin has for at least a year to achieve sincere freedom in the work place.
To the right is the 'basic' RNC mannequin, make your choice.
OR.
Should I say, "Paint your wagon."
OR.
Should I say, "Paint your wagon."