Given the high level of corruption brought to the Special Counsel investigation by the DOJ, I didn't get very far on page 8.

I do mean corruption. There were revised decision making rules introduced into the Special Counsel Investigation and then there is the memo that has no place in decison making rules. It has never been included in any process at the DOJ before Trump's administration. The manual and memo are highly corrupted. It was grossly inappropriate for the DOJ to enter a new decision making manual to the Special Counsel investigation

Every one of these issues, be it the new decision making manual or the memo are all ethics violations.

This continues from Page 8 to Page 9 of the report. It is page 17 of the PDF.

Section V of the report provides detailed explanations of the Office's charging decisions, which contain three main components.

First, the Office determined that Russia's two principal interference operations in the 2016 U.S. presidential election-the social media campaign and the hacking-and-dumping operations violated U.S. criminal law. Many of the individuals and entities involved in the social media campaign have been charged with participating in a conspiracy to defraud the United States by undermining through deceptive acts the work of federal agencies charged with regulating foreign influence in U.S. elections, as well as related counts of identity theft. See United States v. Internet Research Agency, et al., No. 18-cr-32 (D.D.C.). Separately, Russian intelligence officers who carried out the hacking into Democratic Party computers and the personal email accounts of individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign conspired to violate, among other federal laws, the federal computer-intrusion statute, and the have been so char ed. See United States v.Ne ksho, et al., No. 18-cr-215 D.D.C .. (click here)

Harm to Ongoing Matter

This is not included to the public release of the redacted Special Counsel report. There is a site that claims to have some of the supporting documents to the Special Council report (click here). This website accumulated these documents from the trials that have come out of the Mueller investigation so far. This is NOT complete. The links to these documents are not on this webpage. I try to keep links and use of cyberspace on "Blogger" to a minimum. For accuracy please to the website to view these documents. Thank you.

Litigation Documents

• U.S. v. Michael D. Cohen
• U.S. v. Michael T. Flynn
• U.S. v. Richard W. Gates III (District of Columbia)
• U.S. v. Richard W. Gates III (Eastern District of Virginia)
• U.S. v. Internet Research Agency LLC, et al
• U.S. v. Konstantin Kilimnik
• U.S. v. Paul J Manafort, Jr (District of Columbia)
• U.S. v. Paul J. Manafort, Jr (Eastern District of Virginia)
• Paul J. Manafort, Jr v. U.S. Department of Justice
• Andrew Miller v. U.S.
• U.S. v. Viktor Borisovich Netyksho
• U.S. v. George Papadopoulos
• U.S. v. Richard Pinedo, et al
• Sealed v. Sealed (In re Grand Jury Subpoena)
• U.S. v. Roger J. Stone, Jr.
• U.S. v. Alexander van der Zwaan

continued in next entry