I never thought I'd agree with Hugh Hewitt, but, he is correct in regard to a recent statement by Ben Carson.

Article Six of the United States Constitution establishes the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it as the supreme law of the land, forbids a religious test as a requirement for holding a governmental position and holds the United States under the Constitution responsible for debts incurred by the United States under the Articles of Confederation.

This falls in with the anti-sharia laws that have been popular with the Red States.  Such measures would require an amendment to the USA Constitution. I am wondering how exactly Ben Carson sees an amendment since he was clearly objecting to a Muslim elected as President of the USA. Is he willing to take this path to insure his concerns.

The anti-sharia laws state it is never to be a governing method of the USA. Since the laws are about governing they are unconstitutional, but, it has been a concern of the Red States. 

I would like to know how these folks resolve the conflict between party members and the reality of the USA Constitution. Muslims have existed for a long time and before the USA Constitution was written. So, where do all those concerned go to achieve their goal and do they actually carry brevity or are they frivolous to the elections?