To begin, Senator Feinstein has always voted to support the USPS, never once saw the benefit to dismantle it. There is absolutely no conflict of interest. Many times, brilliant women are married to successful men. I am happy about this simply because I know the buildings will result in a good price for the land which will benefit the post office. If a Republican was involved, it would be conflict of interest and they'd be giving the buildings away to cronies as worthless.
Nice couple.
Nice couple.
It was recently learned that the United States has entered into a contract with one firm to sell 56 buildings
that currently house U.S. Post Offices. The government has decided that
it no longer needs these buildings (many of which are located on prime
land in towns and cities across the country).
The sale of these properties will bring in billions of dollars and, with that, millions of dollars in commissions for the one Company that is in charge of handling the sale and negotiation of the new leases.
What makes this such a matter of concern is that the company that the Government has contracted with to conduct the sales (and the corresponding leases for the new locations of the displaced post offices) is owned by Richard Blum.
Does that name mean anything to you? Maybe it shouldre-phrased
and say that the person who owns the company that is solely in charge
of this multi-million-dollar transaction is Richard Blum the husband of
Senator Dianne Feinstein.
The sale of these properties will bring in billions of dollars and, with that, millions of dollars in commissions for the one Company that is in charge of handling the sale and negotiation of the new leases.
What makes this such a matter of concern is that the company that the Government has contracted with to conduct the sales (and the corresponding leases for the new locations of the displaced post offices) is owned by Richard Blum.
Does that name mean anything to you? Maybe it should