Friday, December 04, 2015

TPP definitions from O thru R

originating means qualifying under the rules of origin set out in Chapter 3 (Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures) (click here) 

Executive Summary Chapter 3

TPP’s Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures chapter creates rules of origin defining what it means for a product to be originating from TPP partner countries and thereby eligible for TPP benefits. It also creates the mechanisms for enforcing these rules. Together, this makes sure the agreement’s benefits go to TPP Parties that are taking on the Agreement’s high-standard, ambitious obligations. TPP’s strong rules of origin will help remove incentives for U.S. companies to move production abroad and encourage them to keep high-paying jobs in the United States

or Chapter 4 (Textiles and Apparel) (click here);

Executive Summary
TPP’s Textiles and Apparel chapter will create export opportunities for Made-in-America clothes, fabrics, and yarns and support jobs in the United States. This objective is advanced by a “yarn-forward” approach that requires use of yarns and fabrics from TPP countries in end products qualifying for preferential treatment under TPP—with some flexibility so that American businesses and workers whose products depend on inputs not available within the TPP region can still benefit. The yarn-forward approach also will help to develop a regionally-integrated supply chain that will promote long-term growth and investment in this sector in the United States.  The Textiles and Apparel chapter also secures close customs cooperation among TPP Parties to facilitate effective enforcement of the rules; and ensures that U.S. companies have access to temporary relief if an import surge causes, or threatens to cause, serious damage to their business.

Party means any State or separate customs territory for which this Agreement is in force;

There is a separation it would seem between state and custom territory. Islands that are a country's possession?

person means a natural person or an enterprise;

Well, the USA Supreme Court now defines 'an enterprise' as a person in an international treaty. That changes the national standard of many countries and now it pervades the definition 36 percent of the world's GDP.

TPP with 11 other like-minded countries (Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam) that share a commitment to concluding a high-standard, ambitious agreement and to expanding the initial group to include additional countries throughout the Asia-Pacific region

All these countries are willing to allow citizenship to enterprises? That means Wall Street has citizen rights in all these countries

It seems to me this assaults sovereignty and tilts leverage to Wall Street. There aren't PACs in these countries. Some of these countries cannot afford such instruments to resist Wall Street's power in their country. Vietnam is lost to Wall Street's whims. This is toxic and I can't believe enterprises including their money has this kind of global power over sovereign and democratized governments.

There are many, many reasons for members of Congress to defeat this trade agreement. It is overreaching. Absolutely. 

person of a Party means a national or an enterprise of a Party; 

preferential tariff treatment means the customs duty rate applicable to an originating good, pursuant to each Party’s Tariff Elimination Schedule set out in Annex 2-D (Tariff Elimination);

Preferential tariff Treatment is a schedule of lower rates or other advantages over others.

NAFTA had the same provision (click here).

SUBJECT: FILING AND PROCESSING CLAIMS UNDER THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT (NAFTA) 1 PURPOSE. 

This directive provides policy and instructions for filing claims under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), including post-importation and corrected claims. It also outlines the procedures for processing such claims. This directive should be read in conjunction with 19 CFR 181, Subparts C and D....
  
NAFTA calls it special or preferential.

Got that? A Party can import products or services with an allowance to 'catch up' with any tariff or tax. Just like filing a new income tax form when errors are made. 

Here is something else.  

What happens "Most Favored Nation" status (MFN)? This has been a policy the USA has used successfully against human rights abuses. This practice by the USA is can be completely dissolved under TPP if enterprises are treated like citizens. Just to note MFN is minimized within the WTO structure. The reason MFN is usually dissolved in trade agreements is to prevent government interference with Wall Street.

recovered material means a material in the form of one or more individual parts that results from:
(a) the disassembly of a used good into individual parts; and
(b) the cleaning, inspecting, testing or other processing of those parts as necessary for improvement to sound working condition;

Material recycled falls under this agreement. There are small businesses that specialize in selling merchandise made from recycled material in the USA. While this is 'nice' I am not convinced American small businesses such as the one that recycles materials can afford marketing and shipping to foreign countries.  

American Small Businesses will have to form a cooperative for the explicit reason of lobbying. The cooperatives can be specialized to the product if there are enough members to carry lobbyists. Cooperatives can be non-profits and have a Board of Trustees to hire employees and set agendas. But, under TPP I don't see a cooperative of small businesses/local economies as an option. Eventually, the cooperative will have to have the capacity to hire lawyers as well. The cost of these activities need to be considered seriously because it might increase costs of marketed products and/or services. 

However, the cooperative will minimize that cost and distribute the cost to member organizations. Non-profits are also allowed to raise money to fund these demands as well. These are not political PACS, but, a non-profit to educate the public about choices and insure ECONOMIC stability. I would think of them as ECONOMIC PACS.

I am also thinking the sovereign borders of a city or town could be included in such a non-profit, but, none of the monies can be used for political purposes. Including a government structure as a member or two members of the Board of Trustees would result in expediency of implementation of the agenda of the organization.   

I think such an organization would fall under C3 and political falls under C4.

Avoid corruption and entities that are unhelpful.
 
remanufactured good means a good classified in HS Chapters 84 through 90 or under heading 94.02 except goods classified under HS headings 84.18, 85.09, 85.10, and 85.16, 87.03 or subheadings 8414.51, 8450.11, 8450.12, 8508.11, and 8517.11, that is entirely or partially composed of recovered materials and:
(a) has a similar life expectancy and performs the same as or similar to such a good when new; and
(b) has a factory warranty similar to that applicable to such a good when new; 

Remanufactered Goods: An overview of the USA and Global Industries, Markets and Trade (click here) 

Abstract (Page i) 

Remanufacturing is an industrial process that restores end-of-life goods to their original working condition. This report provides an overview of U.S. remanufactured
goods industries and markets, estimates U.S. trade in remanufactured goods, and examines major factors that affected U.S. sales, trade, and investment during 2009–11. The United States is the largest remanufacturer in the world, and between 2009 and 2011, the value of U.S. remanufactured production grew by 15 percent to at least $43.0 billion, supporting 180,000 full-time U.S. jobs. The remanufacturing-intensive sectors that account for the majority of remanufacturing activity in the United States include
aerospace, consumer products, electrical apparatus, heavy-duty and off-road equipment, information technology products, locomotives, machinery, medical devices, motor vehicle parts, office furniture, restaurant equipment, and retreaded tires. U.S. exports of remanufactured goods totaled $11.7 billion in 2011; almost 40 percent of the total went to free trade agreement partners. Foreign remanufacturers that have
invested in the United States account for about one-sixth of U.S. trade in remanufactured goods and cores (the used or discarded component that is remanufactured). Although the United States and Europe currently account for the bulk of remanufacturing activities and associated trade, other countries are developing their own remanufacturing industries. In foreign markets, regulatory barriers, import bans,
and the lack of a common definition of remanufactured goods limit trade in remanufactured goods and cores.

This overview was prepared by (USIT) United States International Trade Commission (click here)

regional level of government has for each Party the meaning set out at Annex 1-A (Party-Specific Definitions):

This is out of Annex 1:

Subject to Legal Review (click here) in English, Spanish and French for Accuracy, Clarity and Consistency Subject to Authentication of English, Spanish and 
French Versions

Ready to learn a few new languages? Local libraries can obtain translation services with or most likely without a fee. Local libraries are supported by local taxes. There are lot of services, including a Reference Librarian, the average small business person doesn't tap for any issue. Reference Librarians are good thing. It is their job to be helpful.

In Annex 1 the definition of "level of government" is e.  REGIONAL is a big deal and so far I haven't run into definitions of regional. But, not to be undone I found something else to bring meaning and clarity to the 'idea' of regional. To my way of thinking as if in the USA this is like the difference between federal and state or state and local government.

...The provincial governments (click here) have a similar constitutional arrangement to the national government and have concurrent power with the latter in areas such as agriculture, business development, town planning, forestry and natural resources. National laws, however, take precedence over provincial laws if there is a conflict. The minister responsible for provincial government and local-level government must deliver a report on the working of the system of provincial governments and local-level governments at least once a year. Local government bodies in Papua New Guinea include local government councils and local government authorities established under the pre-Independence law known as the Local Government Act of 1963.... 

The problem is how does any business person with their own enterprise know if the French and Spanish versions are directly interpreted the same of the English version and vice versa? No language on Earth directly translates EXACTLY to or out of English. It just the way it is. So, where business people run into a hideous idea in new trade agreements, get a copy of the translated provision in all three applications. 

The word that defines the difference in language translation is SYNTAX. Every language has it's own construction.  

I will return to read the TPP.

A bride with a plan to kill Americans.

December 4. 2015
Tashfeen Malik (click here) pledged allegiance to the leader of ISIS just before she and her husband carried out the San Bernardino massacre, law enforcement sources told NBC News. 

Malik posted a statement of support for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi on Facebook "just before the attack," one official familiar with the issue said....

Just one thing.

Where is immigration reform when the country needs it? And we have a daughter growing up in the USA. I strongly suggest Tashfeen Malik's family be visited by an Ambassador with an armed contingency.

I can't help believe a family member encouraged the relationship. Women can be material witnesses as well as terror soldiers. The Jordan bombing include a husband and wife, however, she never set off her suicide bomb.

December 1, 2015


The Lebanese government (click here) on Tuesday released the former wife of ISIS chief Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi as part of a prisoner swap with an al Qaeda affiliate, a Lebanese security official said.
The woman, Saja al-Dulaimi, was among a group of Islamists that the Lebanese government exchanged for Lebanese soldiers held captive by al Qaeda-affiliated al Nusra Front, the security official said on condition of anonymity.
Dulaimi, who reportedly has been divorced from Baghdadi for more than six years, had been in Lebanese custody since her arrest in December 2014 as she was trying to enter the country from Syria.
The prisoner swap, following lengthy negotiations, happened Tuesday in the Lebanese town of Arsal, near the Syrian border, Lebanon's official National News Agency said....

I know the men receive a treasure trove of virgins when dead, but, what do the wives get?

Definiton of TPP D thru M

days means calendar days;

January 1 thru December 31 tax applications. The TPP does not have it's own fiscal calendar. At least with this edition. 

enterprise means any entity constituted or organized under applicable law, whether or not for profit, and whether privately or governmentally owned or controlled, including any corporation, trust, partnership, sole proprietorship, joint venture, association, or similar organization; 

Profit or non-profit can be involved with the TPP so long as it was organized/created under sovereign law.
 
existing means in effect on the date of entry into force of this Agreement;

GATS means the General Agreement on Trade in Services, (click here) contained in Annex 1B to the WTO Agreement; 


Another WTO reference. That is that now about ten times.

GATT 1994 means the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (click here), contained in Annex 1A to the WTO Agreement;


Let's call this WTO 11. Below is a better site for Annex 1 and 2 to the WTO Agreement.  

Legal texts: the WTO agreements (click here)
The WTO’s agreements are often called the Final Act of the 1986–1994 Uruguay Round of trade negotiations, although strictly speaking the Final Act is the first of the agreements. You can download these texts as WordPerfect or pdf files.

goods of a Party means domestic products as these are understood in GATT 1994 or such goods as the Parties may agree, and includes originating goods of a Party;

"goods of a party" can include anything, INCLUDING, raw materials (originating goods).

government procurement means the process by which a government obtains the use of or acquires goods or services, or any combination thereof, for governmental purposes and not with a view to commercial sale or resale or use in the production or supply of goods or services for commercial sale or resale;


Separates the government economy from that of private industry in that it cannot private industry cannot USE the government to obtain goods and services at the expense of the people.

Harmonized System (HS) means the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System, including its General Rules of Interpretation, Section Notes, Chapter Notes and Subheading Notes as adopted and implemented by the Parties in their respective laws;


Customs

The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (click here)  generally referred to as "Harmonized System" or simply "HS" is a multipurpose international product nomenclature developed by the World Customs Organization (WCO). 
It comprises about 5,000 commodity groups; each identified by a six digit code, arranged in a legal and logical structure and is supported by well-defined rules to achieve uniform classification. 
The system is used by more than 200 countries and economies as a basis for their Customs tariffs and for the collection of international trade statistics. Over 98 % of the merchandise in international trade is classified in terms of the HS. 
The HS contributes to the harmonization of Customs and trade procedures, and the non-documentary trade data interchange in connection with such procedures, thus reducing the costs related to international trade....

heading means the first four digits in the tariff classification number (click here - type in commodity for number) under the Harmonized System

measure includes any law, regulation, procedure, requirement, or practice;


national means a natural person who has the nationality of a Party according to Annex1-A (Party-Specific Definition) or a permanent resident of a Party

This document refers to natural person. What heck is this about? Immigration? ....natural person...or a permanent resident of a Party. The trade contracts have to be established by natural born citizens or those possessing the rights of a natural born resident. The definition is suppose to be benign and inclusive of all people considered citizens of a country, however; this document includes the fact immigrants can come to a country such as the USA, gain residency and then embark on importation under this agreement.

Definitions under letter C

central level of government has for each Party the meaning set out at Annex 1-A (Party-Specific Definitions).

Annex 1-A is further down page in this section.

Commission means the Trans-Pacific Partnership Commission established under Article 27.1 (Establishment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Commission);

covered investment means, with respect to a Party, an investment in its territory of an investor of another Party in existence as of the date of entry into force of this Agreement or established, acquired, or expanded thereafter;

Covered investment is a permanent agreement that leverages favor to the agreement in any litigation.

customs administration means the competent authority that is responsible under the laws of a Party for the administration of customs laws, regulations and, where applicable, policies, and has for each Party the meaning set out at Annex 1-A (Party-Specific Definitions)

Custom enforcement. What about enforcement of national defense and sovereignty?
 
customs duty includes any duty or charge of any kind imposed on or in connection with the importation of a good, and any surtax or surcharge imposed in connection with such importation, but does not include any:
(a) charge equivalent to an internal tax imposed consistently with Article III:2 of GATT 1994 (click here);

What a mess.  Tax, tariff exemption. Call it the Wall Street Exemption.

2.     The products of the territory of any contracting party imported into the territory of any other contracting party shall not be subject, directly or indirectly, to internal taxes or other internal charges of any kind in excess of those applied, directly or indirectly, to like domestic products. Moreover, no contracting party shall otherwise apply internal taxes or other internal charges to imported or domestic products in a manner contrary to the principles set forth in paragraph 1.*

Paragraph 1 is called into this document. The exemption of all that is considered an economic interest.

 1.     The contracting parties recognize that internal taxes and other internal charges, and laws, regulations and requirements affecting the internal sale, offering for sale, purchase, transportation, distribution or use of products, and internal quantitative regulations requiring the mixture, processing or use of products in specified amounts or proportions, should not be applied to imported or domestic products so as to afford protection to domestic production.*

These are additions from the WTO modifying the above paragraphs.

Oops, there it is. Where does anyone get the idea a agreement can undo local taxes and fees. New York City has local taxes. There is not a county, city or town in the USA without city fees. 

This agreement dismantles local economies so they can be customized to profits for Wall  Street.
 
Paragraph 1
     The application of paragraph 1 to internal taxes imposed by local governments and authorities within the territory of a contracting party is subject to the provisions of the final paragraph of Article XXIV. The term “reasonable measures” in the last-mentioned paragraph would not require, for example, the repeal of existing national legislation authorizing local governments to impose internal taxes which, although technically inconsistent with the letter of Article III, are not in fact inconsistent with its spirit, if such repeal would result in a serious financial hardship for the local governments or authorities concerned. With regard to taxation by local governments or authorities which is inconsistent with both the letter and spirit of Article III, the term “reasonable measures” would permit a contracting party to eliminate the inconsistent taxation gradually over a transition period, if abrupt action would create serious administrative and financial difficulties.

At least the WTO recognizes local economies as vital to trade relations. The TPP dismantles the authority of governance. It dissolves the mandates within the WTO to protect local economies.
Paragraph 2

     A tax conforming to the requirements of the first sentence of paragraph 2 would be considered to be inconsistent with the provisions of the second sentence only in cases where competition was involved between, on the one hand, the taxed product and, on the other hand, a directly competitive or substitutable product which was not similarly taxed.
 
(b) fee or other charge in connection with the importation commensurate with the cost of services rendered; and
(c) antidumping or countervailing duty.

Under the Tariff Act of 1930, U.S. industries may petition the government for relief from imports that are sold in the United States at less than fair value ("dumped") or which benefit from subsidies provided through foreign government programs. Under the law, the U.S. Department of Commerce determines whether the dumping or subsidizing exists and, if so, the margin of dumping or amount of the subsidy; the USITC determines whether there is material injury or threat of material injury to the domestic industry by reason of the dumped or subsidized imports. For industries not yet established, the USITC may also be asked to determine whether the establishment of an industry is being materially retarded by reason of the dumped or subsidized imports.

Antidumping is already covered in the WTO. The above law written in 1930 will remain.

SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA
19 November 2015 - 4:15pm
Cho Jin-young
The WTO determined (click here) that the dumping margin calculation method that the United States recently employed in its anti-dumping investigation regarding Korean washing machines constituted a violation of the WTO’s rules. The determination means that the U.S. cannot take advantage of zeroing any longer as a non-tariff barrier. Until recently, the U.S. adopted zeroing in its margin calculation, claiming that target dumping occurred with regard to specific Korean washing machines sold during a certain period of time.
Since the KORUS FTA took effect three years ago, the U.S. government has created various non-tariff barriers so as to cope with a rapid increase in the export of electronics products from Korea to the United States. The Department of Commerce applied a determination of dumping to Korean washing machines in late 2012 and imposed an anti-dumping tariff of 9.29 percent on the products of Samsung Electronics, 13.02 percent on those of LG Electronics and 82.41 percent on those of Daewoo Electronics. The measure led to a sharp decline in the companies’ exports of the item to the U.S....

Ya got to love this mess to know the definitions in the WTO doesn't necessarily have the same meaning in the TPP. Below is the defintion of  'zeroing' in the WTO language.


GLOSSARY TERM

Zeroing


An investigating authority usually calculates the dumping margin by getting the average of the differences between the export prices and the home market prices of the product in question. When it chooses to disregard or put a value of zero on instances when the export price is higher than the home market price, the practice is called “zeroing”. Critics claim this practice artificially inflates dumping margins.

This official table of contents is below of the United States Trade Representative shows the existing tariffs and when they will be eliminated. This is a window of time. During that time parties adversely effected by the TPP need to pursue injunctions against the implementation.

I think the crux of preventing disaster lies in interrupting implementation. The unfairness and outcomes remain elusive from the TPP agreement itself. I think injuctions can be obtained when FACTS and FIGURES of how this will adversely effect real human beings and their families are presented to USA courts. The way this agreement seems to be structured it is far better to begin the litigation process BEFORE the provisions take effect. Once implemented there will be a dynamic that is unmanageable resulting in all sorts manipulations designed to undercut any lawsuit against a country within the agreement. Get it into the judicial record BEFORE the implementation of the agreement begins. Manage the implementation rather than fight it afterward. 

Bring down provisions in the agreement to levels that are benevolent to the USA local economy (which is a sovereignty issue) and American labor. 

It is questionable whether the Democrats have enough votes to prevent passage of the TPP. If this goes in effect then manage it through the window of time allowed in the agreement. The agreement is unconstitutional. It assaults the taxes and tariffs (another form of tax) provided for by the USA Constitution. Unconstitutional is unconstitutional. It assaults sovereignty. Those adversely effected which is everyone but the Longshoremen have a responsibility to prevent this document from becoming undisputed law.  

Lawsuits filed before the implementation will have the advantage of all existing law before it gets muddied up by this mess. I have no doubt Congress will carry out a lot of mischief regarding this, but, early lawsuits can handle the mischief making and will bring in the respect Congress has for the US Constitution. Take it to the Supreme Court. The Commerce Claus does not provide for sovereign destruction. At least it is not suppose to.

NLRB can be asked to review these laws that will adversely effect Americans and their families. But, the NLRB is not the only venue American labor should be applying

When litigating, don't forget the national debt and how this agreement is UNFUNDED to the losses the USA will suffer in eliminating tariffs and taxes. The loss of US Treasury income by this agreement should be removed from the Defense Department funding.

TPP Final Table of Contents (click here)

SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA
19 November 2015 - 4:15pm
Cho Jin-young
- See more at: http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/english/news/politics/13077-anti-dumping-dump-wto-rules-favor-korea-anti-dumping-suit-against-us#sthash.XqtVDjCE.dpuf
he WTO determined that the dumping margin calculation method that the United States recently employed in its anti-dumping investigation regarding Korean washing machines constituted a violation of the WTO’s rules.
The determination means that the U.S. cannot take advantage of zeroing any longer as a non-tariff barrier. Until recently, the U.S. adopted zeroing in its margin calculation, claiming that target dumping occurred with regard to specific Korean washing machines sold during a certain period of time.
Since the KORUS FTA took effect three years ago, the U.S. government has created various non-tariff barriers so as to cope with a rapid increase in the export of electronics products from Korea to the United States. The Department of Commerce applied a determination of dumping to Korean washing machines in late 2012 and imposed an anti-dumping tariff of 9.29 percent on the products of Samsung Electronics, 13.02 percent on those of LG Electronics and 82.41 percent on those of Daewoo Electronics. The measure led to a sharp decline in the companies’ exports of the item to the U.S.
- See more at: http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/english/news/politics/13077-anti-dumping-dump-wto-rules-favor-korea-anti-dumping-suit-against-us#sthash.XqtVDjCE.dpuf
Customs Valuation Agreement means the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, contained in Annex 1A to the WTO Agreement;

Exclusive language.

Section B: General Definitions
Article 1.3: General Definitions

For the purposes of this Agreement, unless otherwise specified:

So far, I have brought the WTO forward five times. This is ridiculous. What about the WTO do the participating countries dislike? 

Agreement means the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement;

APEC means Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation;

 

APEC? (click here) APEC is in there, too? Joking. Why does this document exist? 

How many Senators and House Congresspersons read the TPP. All they need to know are talking points, right?

October 6, 2015
By Daniel W. Drezner

...Snell is right. (click here) As an exercise, I surfed the Web to see what members of Congress had said about the TPP since Monday’s announcement. Here’s what I found:

  • Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah):  “Closing a deal is an achievement for our nation only if it works for the American people and can pass Congress by meeting the high-standard objectives laid out in bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority.  While the details are still emerging, unfortunately I am afraid this deal appears to fall woefully short…. The Trans-Pacific Partnership is a once in a lifetime opportunity and the United States should not settle for a mediocre deal that fails to  set high-standard trade rules in the Asia-Pacific region for years to come.”...

Chapter 1

General Definitions
The chapter provides definitions of terms that are used in more than one chapter of the Agreement. Specific chapters also provide definitions of terms that are only used in those chapters.

Section A: Initial Provisions
Article 1.1: Establishment of a Free Trade Area

The Parties to this Agreement, consistent with Article XXIV of GATT 1994 (click here) and Article V of GATS (click here), hereby establish a free trade area in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement.

GATT has a long history. 


It is the WTO. 

Article 1.2: Relation to Other Agreements
1. Recognizing the Parties’ intention for this Agreement to coexist with their existing international agreements, each Party affirms,
(a) in relation to existing international agreements to which all Parties are party, including the WTO Agreement, its existing rights and obligations with respect to each other; and
(b) in relation to existing international agreements to which that Party and at least one other Party are party, its existing rights and obligations with respect to such other Party or Parties, as the case may be.

This is unbelievable. Does anyone realize how complicated any trade between these countries will be to litigate. I have not heard there would be a free standing TPP court. That means any unfair complaint has to go through years and years of litigation before the interpretation of MANY mitigation platforms are the final decision.

This is completely typical of any Wall Street establishment. This is completely characteristic of the petroleum industry. The rules are made to favor Wall Street and when it is realized as adverse to consumers, small business and especially local economies and lifestyles the damage is already done. TYPICAL, TYPICAL LEGAL CIRCUS while Wall Street reaps their profits and distributes it to stockholders.  

The WTO doesn't recognize this document. The WTO will not set precedent by yielding to outside trade agreements. There are countries that are not part of this and if the WTO yields to this agreement in any way it sets up precedent that would bring non-participatory countries under the umbrella of the TPP. The WTO will not recognize this agreement. Any one who states the WTO is the only venue needed to mitigate this agreement are lying. This document will require courts within countries. Ready to learn a new language? The mitigation of this document will be extremely difficult, will require multi-venues and cost lots of money that makes it ineffective to even begin a complaint.
 
2. If a Party believes that a provision of this Agreement is inconsistent with a provision of another agreement to which it and at least one other Party are party, upon request, the relevant Parties to the other agreement shall consult with a view to reaching a mutually satisfactory solution. This paragraph is without prejudice to a Party’s rights and obligations under Chapter 28 (Dispute Settlement).[1]

The mitigation for the countries in this document is to set up a committee to bring about an understanding of 'what happens next.' This is nothing but pure corruption. The countries when deciding there are unfair practices or unbalanced issues STEP OUTSIDE the agreement to settle any dispute.

Why bother? Why bother with the document at all. AND while this committee meets the unfair practices are going on everyday and every hour.
This chapter organizes and provides overall structure for the TPP Agreement; sets out the relationship between the TPP Agreement and other agreements already in place among the TPP Parties (in particular the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement, but also existing free trade agreements among the TPP Parties); and defines technical terms used in more than one chapter of the Agreement.

There it is. I said there was absolutely no reason for the TPP because there are already trading relationships with the member countries AND there isn't anything here that cannot be mitigated through the  WTO. The TPP is about creating unfair profits for Wall Street. It is nothing else and the LIES ARE INSTITUTIONALIZED with this document.

Overview

Relation to Other Agreements
The TPP Parties have obligations to each other under other agreements, such as the WTO Agreement. This chapter affirms that these other agreements remain in place. In addition, although we have been careful to ensure that TPP does not create any obligations that would be inconsistent with any of our existing agreements (including the WTO Agreement), a TPP Party may request consultations with another Party if it believes there is an inconsistency. In many cases, TPP will broaden or improve upon commitments in existing agreements. For example, the commitments Mexico, Canada, Chile, Singapore, Australia, and Peru have made in TPP’s Labor and Environment chapters broaden and improve upon NAFTA and previous FTAs. Regardless of the agreements, TPP Parties will be obligated to implement TPP’s more ambitious standards.

That is exactly the problem with TPP, it level the playing field for Americans and their business interests. I don't consider lower wages and less opportunity as an asset.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)(click here) levels the playing field for American workers and American businesses, leading to more Made-in-America exports and more higher-paying American jobs here at home. By cutting over 18,000 taxes different countries put on Made-in-America products, TPP makes sure our farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, service suppliers, and small businesses can compete — and win — in some of the fastest growing markets in the world. With more than 95 percent of the world’s consumers living outside our borders, TPP will significantly expand the export of Made-in-America goods and services and support American jobs.

The TPP controls 36 percent of the global GDP. This paragraph is a paragraph to create images of success and does not spell out exactly the success as they will occur. NUMBERS. Numbers of Americans that will lose their jobs other than those that handle shipping containers in and out of the USA. Numbers of people impacted with poorer wages. Lots of numbers and none of them are good. Numbers of dollar in profits Wall Street will CONTROL and place them outside the arm of law. Numbers like QE1, 2 and 3 designed to bring Wall Street investment when Americans were told it was about creating jobs. Number of lies told to help the politics.