A commentator stated Airbus is breathing a sigh of relief today because this was a deliberate act? Seriously?
This happened on an Airbus jet, what safeguards are built into a jet to prevent this type of tragedy. I would not be breathing a sigh of relief if I were them.
This isn't the first time this type of disaster has occurred. There is no reason for guns on board and there should be no axes on board, there has to be different locking mechanisms on the cockpit door to provide free and easy access to the crew members while keeping passengers out of any potential to interfere with the flight.
The locking mechanism has to be mechanical and not electronic. This could have been prevented, Airbus needs to take their quality control seriously.
The fact that a cockpit door locks and can't be opened is insane. It should never exist and the barbaric idea axes and guns are in access of the pilots is hideous.
Legislators are not engineers. To actually have a major company such as Airbus sit ideally by to allow legislators decide what needs to be done is extremely negligent. Airbus should have answers before there are questions even asked.
Why should a jet be considered safe transportation if the manufacturers have no regard for the passenger and their safety to live through that transit. Airbus and every other jet manufacturer have a lot in the balance of this investigation.
There is no excuse here.
We have witnessed large jets used as bombs and now as an end to some distress by a young pilot. Yet the jet manufacturers sit by to wait for the decisions of legislators so they can do MINIMAL modifications to their jets.
This is so typical of major Wall Street companies. They lobby legislators, they buy elections to prevent from regulation that MAY cost them a miniscule dollar in the cost of their jets. Every possible scenario of danger should be realized before the jets are even put into blueprints.
No one is even discussing how much fuel was in that jet that caused it to be completely destroyed on impact.
This happened on an Airbus jet, what safeguards are built into a jet to prevent this type of tragedy. I would not be breathing a sigh of relief if I were them.
This isn't the first time this type of disaster has occurred. There is no reason for guns on board and there should be no axes on board, there has to be different locking mechanisms on the cockpit door to provide free and easy access to the crew members while keeping passengers out of any potential to interfere with the flight.
The locking mechanism has to be mechanical and not electronic. This could have been prevented, Airbus needs to take their quality control seriously.
The fact that a cockpit door locks and can't be opened is insane. It should never exist and the barbaric idea axes and guns are in access of the pilots is hideous.
Legislators are not engineers. To actually have a major company such as Airbus sit ideally by to allow legislators decide what needs to be done is extremely negligent. Airbus should have answers before there are questions even asked.
Why should a jet be considered safe transportation if the manufacturers have no regard for the passenger and their safety to live through that transit. Airbus and every other jet manufacturer have a lot in the balance of this investigation.
There is no excuse here.
We have witnessed large jets used as bombs and now as an end to some distress by a young pilot. Yet the jet manufacturers sit by to wait for the decisions of legislators so they can do MINIMAL modifications to their jets.
This is so typical of major Wall Street companies. They lobby legislators, they buy elections to prevent from regulation that MAY cost them a miniscule dollar in the cost of their jets. Every possible scenario of danger should be realized before the jets are even put into blueprints.
No one is even discussing how much fuel was in that jet that caused it to be completely destroyed on impact.
