The Olympics
http://www.torino2006.org/ENG/OlympicGames/home/index.html
Russia's skier wins gold in men's cross-country pursuit race
TURIN, February 12 (RIA Novosti) - Yevgeny Dementyev of Russia won the men's 30-km pursuit race in the cross-country skiing at the Turin Winter Olympics Sunday.
The silver medal went to Frode Estil of Norway (0.6 seconds behind Dementyev) and Pietro Piller Cottrer of Italy took the bronze.
Giorgio Di Centa of Italy who led the race several hundred meters before the finish came in fourth.
Dementyev won the first gold medal for the Russian team in Turin. Earlier, Yevgeniya Medvedeva-Arbuzova of Russia won the bronze medal in the women's 15-kilometer pursuit.
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060212/43497108.html
Russia's skier wins bronze in women's cross-country pursuit race
TURIN, February 12 (RIA Novosti) - Yevgeniya Medvedeva-Arbuzova of Russia won the bronze medal in the women's 15-kilometer pursuit Sunday. The gold medal went to Kristina Smigun of Estonia who overtook silver medalist Katerina Neumannova from the Czech Republic, finishing in 42 minutes, 48.7 seconds - 1.9 seconds ahead of Neumannova.
Medvedeva-Arbuzova was 14.5 seconds behind the new Olympic champion.
Russia's Olga Zavyalova finished seventh (35 seconds behind Smigun) and Yulia Chepalova finished ninth (50.8 seconds behind Smigun).
Opening ceremony of the Olympic Winter Games in Italy. The best episodes.
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060212/43494193.html
No doping involved in Russian skier's suspension - official
MOSCOW, February 10 (RIA Novosti, Olesya Karpova) - A Russian sports official ruled out any hint of doping after a skier was suspended for five days Friday in the first whiff of scandal at the start of the 2006 Winter Olympics.
Cross-country competitor Natalia Matveyeva was found to have a high level of hemoglobin, the red substance in the blood that combines with oxygen to take it round the body, after a blood-test.
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060210/43468433.html
Russian sports chief puzzled by Olympic village ban
MADRID, February 10 (RIA Novosti) - Russia's top sports official has been left facing a predicament after the nation's Olympic committee refused to grant him accreditation to visit Russian athletes at their base for the Turin Games.
"I do not understand the reasons behind this decision," said an astonished Vyacheslav Fetisov, the head of the Federal Agency for Physical Culture and Sport, prior to leaving for the 2006 Winter Olympics.
It is not the first time that Fetisov, who is regarded as the country's unofficial sports minister, has been denied contact with Russian athletes in the Olympic Village. He was refused accreditation during the 2004 Summer Olympics in Athens, and had to meet with athletes outside sports facilities.
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20060210/43461425.html
Russians need strong medical support at Olympics - Putin
MOSCOW, February 6 (RIA Novosti) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said Monday that his country's Olympic team should be provided with strong medical, administrative and legal support at the upcoming games in Italy.
Putin met Monday with President of the Russian Olympic Committee (ROC) Leonid Tyagachyov and head of the organizing committee for the Olympics in Turin, Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Zhukov, to discuss the prospects for the Russian team at the 2006 Winter Olympics on February 10-26.
Putin said athletes should not think about doping issues and just focus on their performances, while the ROC handles other issues.
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060206/43377086.html
Uzbek sportsmen promised riches for Olympic gold
TASHKENT, February 7 (RIA Novosti, Abu-Ali Niyazmatov) - The government of Uzbekistan has promised substantial rewards for the country's Winter Olympic competitors in the event that they finish on the podium in their respective disciplines.
With the opening ceremony of the Turin Games only days away, the Uzbekistan Olympic Committee said Tuesday that $100,000 would be paid for any gold medals, $50,000 for silver and $25,000 for bronze, which is an enormous sum for a country that has an estimated per capita GDP of only $1,900 in terms of purchasing power parity.
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060207/43398798.html
Putin supports Sochi Olympic bid
MOSCOW, January 31 (RIA Novosti)-Russia will support the application made by the Black Sea city of Sochi to host the 2014 Winter Olympics, the president said Monday.
Vladimir Putin told a Kremlin news conference that the country needed modern infrastructure and recreational facilities.
"Sochi is the prefect place," he said. "It has a mild climate, the sea is near and there are places with snow all year round in the mountains. I skied there two years ago myself."
http://en.rian.ru/sports/20060131/43257482.html
NBC to televise Olympics 24.5 hours a day
February 10, 2006
BY DAVID BAUDER ASSOCIATED PRESS
PASADENA, Calif.-- There aren't enough hours in the day to watch all the Winter Olympics coverage that NBC and its cable partners are serving up.
Seriously.
Even if you want to watch someone hurtling headfirst down a mountain or actually know what the biathlon is, it's impossible to see it all live. NBC's planned 416 hours of coverage (including the broadcast network and cable outlets) from Turin, Italy, averages out to 24.5 hours a day.
"We are reinventing the clock," said David Neal, executive producer of NBC Sports.
The Winter Games open Feb. 10 and competition stretches for 16 days after that. NBC executives are privately trying to downplay ratings expectations, given that Olympics on U.S. snow and ice-- like Salt Lake City in 2002-- tend to draw more interest. But they're hoping a strong United States team will spike the TV turnout.
http://www.suntimes.com/output/olympics/cst-oly-tv10.html
10 reasons to watch these Olympics
10. Women’s hockey. There are the times the U.S.-Canada rivalry has enough enmity to make Alabama-Auburn look like a PTA meeting. It’s a lock they’ll meet for the gold medal. The Americans won last year’s world championship in a shootout, after regulation and overtime had gone 0-0. Since then, the Canadians have won eight of 10 meetings. The gold medal game may be the closest you ever come to seeing a bunch of young ladies with brass knuckles.
9. Jeremy Bloom. The NCAA made him give up football at the University of Colorado because he had to earn sponsor money to keep his freestyle skiing career alive. He’ll be the only Olympian in Italy trying to win a gold medal, and then returning home for the NFL draft combine.
http://www.rrstar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060210/SPORTS/102100023
Olympics 'contribute to peace'
Pope Benedict XVI said he hoped the Turin Winter Olympics would bring out a spirit of fairness and fraternity and help contribute to peace in the world.
Benedict also sent a special greeting to the athletes and organisers of the games during his traditional Sunday blessing to tourists and the faithful who gathered under his studio window in St Peter's Square in Rome.
http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=222092006
Grandma Luge crashes out
'Grandma Luge' Anne Abernathy was forced to pull out of the Winter Olympics after a heavy crash in training, organisers said today.
Abernathy, 52, broke her wrist while she also smashed the right runner of her sledge after crashing "hard" in her fifth training run.
Abernathy was hoping to take part in her sixth Olympics as the first woman in her fifties at a Winter Games.
"Even if you have a little doubt, if someone is not on top of their game and they are going to fly down the track at 90mph (145km/h), you have to be pretty sure they are OK," said Melita Glanville, the trainer who has worked with Abernathy for six years.
Abernathy made her Olympic debut for the US Virgin Islands in 1988 at Calgary.
Although she has never been a serious medal threat, Abernathy, a cancer survivor, is popular with the sport's fans and her fellow athletes.
The former professional entertainer has won widespread respect for beating cancer, serious head injury and even a hurricane that destroyed her Virgin Islands home.
At these games, Abernathy had been wearing a green racing suit and a red helmet.
"I kind of look like a Christmas tree," she said following a practice run on Friday.
"The red helmet is in honour of women over 50 . . . that we can go out and do what we want to do. It's a big deal for a lot of women that someone over 50 is going out there and doing it."
The runners on Abernathy's sled also sustained serious damage in the wreck on the speedy 19-curve track at Cesana, which has thwarted several sliders in recent days.
The daunting Cesana Pariol course has already claimed a number of victims after opening last year and had to be closed to luge for modifications.
The women's luge competition opens tonight AEST.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/grandma-luge-crashes-out/2006/02/13/1139679504388.html
White wins men's halfpipe of Turin Olympics
American Shaun White cruised to the gold medal in the men's halfpipe snowboard at the Turin Winter Olympics on Sunday.
It was another dominating day in snowboarding for the Americans, who fell one bronze medal short of repeating their historical sweep of 2002.
White claimed the title with 46.8 points, fellow American Danny Kass took the silver at 44.0, while Finland's Markku Koski won the bronze at 41.5.
"It's amazing. There are so many people here, there are so many strong rivals, but I did it so well," said the 20-year-old White with tears in his eyes.
"I don't want to cry, but those tears run outside themselves. I can't control them. I didn't know if I would get the gold, I just knew I wanted it. This is the best year of my life. I'm so happy my whole family is here. I know I won't have this again," said White.
Competitors have to take two runs in the final and are ranked according to their best score of two runs, but White didn't need a second run as his amazing first run with a back-to-back 1080s landing, which earned him 46.8 points, was good enough for a gold medal. He only managed 26.6 points in his second routine run.
White, nicknamed "Flying Tomato" for his longish red hair, had a nightmare start on earlier Sunday as he missed one of the six automatic berths into the final after he landed badly in his first qualifying run.
He then rebounded with an excellent second qualifying run to move on to the final round.
After his winning first final run, White waited and watched the other 11 riders take their second trips. Nobody could better his score after the second-to-last rider, Koski, fell on his final jump. White knew he had the gold in hand.
"It's insane. After that first run I had to see how it would hang out for me. I knew I had to do my best run," said White, who claimed the titles of superpipe and slopestyle in 2006 Winter X- Games.
Kass led the 12 riders after the qualifying runs but failed in the first final run as he only managed 20.8 points. However, he did a wonderful job in the second and collected 44.0 points for the second place, beating Koski, who scored 41.5 in the first run, into the third place.
Koski tried to save his silver medal in the second run, but only had 31.4 points.
World champion Antti Autti of Finland, who was second after the qualifying stage, only finished fifth with 39.1 points.
http://english.people.com.cn/200602/13/eng20060213_242141.html
Luge: Italy claims it's first gold medal of 2006 Olympics
By Kurt Kragthorpe
The Salt Lake Tribune
CESANA PARIOL, Italy - Armin Zoeggeler did it again, Tony Benshoof barely missed doing something special and Georg Hackl did not do what he usually does.
All of the above was big news in luge Sunday night, when the host country claimed its first gold medal of the 2006 Olympics in men's singles.
Zoeggler's victory over Russia's Albert Demtschenko was not unexpected, considering he won at the Utah Olympic Park in 2002 and was the favorite on his home track. So going into the second day of competition, the developing story centered around Benshoof, a Minnesotan who was shooting for America's first singles medal in luge.
He was in third place after Saturday's two runs. But his opening run Sunday cost him that position, and he lost a little more ground to Latvia's Martins Rubenis in the final run. Benshoof was naturally
Advertisement
disappointed with his third run but still described himself as "happy with fourth place" after finishing 17th in 2002.
There's no medal for it this time, as there ordinarily would be, but Benshoof can say he beat Hackl. The 39-year-old German, trying for his sixth Olympic medal since 1988, was third after the first run but dipped to seventh. Hackl will retire with two golds and two silvers. David Moeller, considered the top German contender in a sport his country has dominated, posted the fastest time in the final run but settled for fifth.
http://www.sltrib.com/torino2006/ci_3502461
Winter Olympics day two round-up
French skier Antoine Deneriaz won a shock downhill gold after a stunning late run, while Scots Finlay Mickel and Roger Cruickshank were down the field.
South Korean Ahn Hyun-Soo took the men's short track 1,500m as rival Apolo Anton Ohno slid out of the semi-finals.
American Shaun White won the snowboard half-pipe, but Britain's Dan Wakeham failed to reach the final.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/other_sports/winter_sports/4671778.stm
The "Link" below at the BBC Olympics Headquarters has an interactive where one can select the day for schedules and events.
Winter Olympics schedule - 13 February
Daily event schedule for the Winter Olympics including BBC coverage details.
Daily event schedule for the Winter Olympics including BBC coverage details.
All times GMT.
MONDAY FEBRUARY 13
BBC COVERAGE
Television
BBC TWO - 1230-1600, 2030-2230*
Interactive TV - Three video streams 0800-0000*
BBC Sport 7-day programme guide
Website
News round the clock; live streaming of interactive video
Full interactive listings
Radio - Five Live updates through the day
(* Times subject to late change)
EVENT SCHEDULE
Curling
Men's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet A - New Zealand v Sweden, 0800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet B - Italy v Great Britain, 0800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet C - Norway v United States, 0800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet D - Finland v Switzerland, 0800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Women's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet A - Norway v United States, 1300 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Women's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet B - Canada v Sweden, 1300 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Women's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet C - Switzerland v Italy, 1300 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Women's Round Robin, Session 1 Sheet D - Great Britain v Denmark, 1300 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 2 Sheet A - Germany v Canada, 1800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 2 Sheet B - Finland v United States, 1800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 2 Sheet C - Great Britain v New Zealand, 1800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Men's Round Robin, Session 2 Sheet D - Italy v Sweden, 1800 Pinerolo Palaghiaccio
Snowboard
Ladies' Halfpipe Qualification Run 1 0900 Bardonecchia
Ladies' Halfpipe Qualification Run 2 1000 Bardonecchia
Halfpipe Final Run 1 1300 Bardonecchia
Ladies' Halfpipe Final Run 2 1335 Bardonecchia
Biathlon
Women's 15 km Individual 1100 Cesana San Sicario
Ice Hockey
Women's Prelim. Round - Group A Game 7 - Sweden v Italy, 1400 Torino Esposizioni
Women's Prelim. Round - Group B Game 8 - Finland v Switzerland, 1630 Palasport Olimpico
Speed Skating
Men's 500 m Race 1 1430 Oval Lingotto
Men's 500 m Race 2 1623 Oval Lingotto
Luge
Women's Singles Run 1 1500 Cesana Pariol
Women's Singles Run 2 1700 Cesana Pariol
Figure Skating
Pairs Free Skating 1800 Palavela
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/winter_sports/schedule/4557858.stm
Powerful opening ceremony a reminder that Olympic Truce goes unheeded
BY ANN KILLION
San Jose Mercury News
TURIN, Italy - They marched in under the five rings, separated by white signs and invisible borders. Wearing different uniforms, waving different flags, arriving in different shades and sizes, with different beliefs and backgrounds.
But, ultimately, at Friday night's opening ceremony, the Olympic athletes stood together, shoulder to shoulder, arm in arm, in a mosh pit of humanity. They danced together, made the "YMCA" gestures together, laughed, cheered and wept a little together.
It was, as always, one of the most powerful moments in sports. No matter what you think of these "16 days of glory," the march of the athletes is profound. It is a moment that isn't marred by Olympic commercialism or controversy. Even rebel skier Bode Miller found it worth his time.
Both symbol and promise, the march of the athletes is one of the few instances when the world truly comes together. A time when Israel and Iran stand side by side. When Kenya is cheered as loudly as the United States. When everyone is a little Slovakian, a little Swedish, a little Chilean - and, this year, a whole lot Italian.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/13843595.htm
The world unites, and it pleads for peace
Ann Killion
Mercury News Staff Columnist
TURIN, Italy - They marched in under the five rings, separated by white signs and invisible borders. Wearing different uniforms, waving different flags, arriving in different shades and sizes, with different beliefs and backgrounds.
But, ultimately, at Friday night's opening ceremony, the Olympic athletes stood together, shoulder to shoulder, arm in arm, in a mosh pit of humanity. They danced together, made the ``YMCA'' gestures together, laughed, cheered and wept a little together.
It was, as always, one of the most powerful moments in sports. No matter what you think of these so-called 16 days of glory, the march of the athletes is profound. It is a moment not marred by commercialism or controversy. Even rebel skier Bode Miller found it worth his time.
Both symbol and promise, the march of the athletes is one of the few instances when the world truly comes together. A time when Israel and Iran stand side by side. When Kenya is cheered as loudly as the United States. When everyone is a little Slovakian, a little Swedish, a little Chilean -- and, this year, a whole lot Italian.
The scene was the embodiment of the Olympic ideal, a principle clearly expressed by Jacques Rogge, president of the International Olympic Committee.
``Our world today is in need of peace, tolerance and brotherhood,'' Rogge said in English, one of the three languages he used during his speech. ``The values of the Olympic Games can deliver these to us. May the Games be held in peace, in the true spirit of the Olympic Truce.''
Sadly, the Olympic Truce is heeded about as seriously as the American quest for alternative energy forms. The leaders of the world pay lip service to the concept, invoking it only when it serves their purposes.
Several of the nations participating, including the host, had thousands of troops in Iraq as Friday's ceremony unfolded. The death toll in our own country steadily mounts. The protests in the Muslim world against Denmark and other European nations continue to rage. The Danish delegation had a special police escort on Friday. Iran is aggressively defying the world on nuclear weapons.
Last month, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan made yet another plea for the Olympic Truce. It is an idea with roots in ancient Greece, when the ekecheiria gave peace and immunity for all traveling to the Games. It was revived in 1991 in the midst of the conflict in the former Yugoslavia, but it has yielded precious few tangible results.
``The period of the Olympics Games is obviously not long enough for us to believe that we can use it to establish lasting peace,'' Annan said. ``It is, however, a chance for protagonists to look around, see how they are destroying their countries and take the chance to explore other options.''
That was the opportunity presented once again Friday night inside the refurbished Stadio Olimpico, originally built in 1932 on orders from Benito Mussolini and eventually stripped of his name.
As first lady Laura Bush looked on, along with her British counterpart, Cherie Blair, and other international dignitaries, the innocent concepts of brotherhood and unity were invoked time and again.
Turin is the largest city to be host to the Winter Olympics, and it showed its best side. For the first time this week, the Alps revealed themselves from beneath the haze, ringing the city. And inside the stadium, the host city reminded us that despite the drab industrial look of things, we are indeed in Italy, the land of Puccini and Dante, Michelangelo and Botticelli. The ceremony was a tribute to Italia, to the snow-capped peaks and to athletics.
There were Armani gowns. A revving Ferrari. A quintessential Italian stallion -- Alberto Tomba -- carrying the torch into the stadium. The famed tenor Luciano Pavarotti filled the stadium with his soaring voice. Sophia Loren was one of a delegation of eight women who carried the Olympic flag into the stadium (others were American actress Susan Sarandon and Chilean author Isabel Allende).
But an overriding theme was peace. Circus climbers dressed in white formed a human dove. Yoko Ono was on hand to recite an ode to peace, and Peter Gabriel performed her husband's famous ballad ``Imagine.''
``Imagine there's no countries,'' he sang, looking out over the athletes from every corner of the globe squished into one circle. ``It's easy if you try.''
Is it naive to think that snowboarders and lugers could really be a force for world peace? Sadly, it probably is. War rages on, and mere Games cannot slow its pace.
``You can show us a world,'' Rogge told the athletes, ``we all long for.''
If we're willing to see it.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/special_packages/olympics/13843682/13847572.htm
Olympics
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/sports/special_packages/olympics/13843682/
The Cheney Observer also known as "They Only Talk the Talk"
Katrina & Recovery
Timeline: Who Knew When the Levees Broke
A Texas Army National Guard helicopter deposits a 6,000 pound-plus bag of sand and gravel to try to close the breach in the 17th Street Canal, Sept. 4, 2005. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers photo by Alan Dooley
“White House officials confirmed… that the report of the levee break arrived there at midnight.”
Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), Feb. 10, 2006
New Orleans residents are evacuated from their homes by a FEMA search and rescue team, Aug. 31, 2005. Photo by Jocelyn Augustino/FEMA
NPR.org, February 10, 2006 · A timeline released by congressional investigators shows that 28 federal, state and local agencies reported problems with levees the day Katrina made landfall in New Orleans. The information is at odds with contentions from Bush administration officials who say they didn't learn about the levee failures until the following day.
MONDAY, AUG. 29, 2005
8:30 a.m.: FEMA's regional office is informed that "a twenty-foot tidal surge… came up and breached the levee system in the canal."
9:08 a.m.: A brief from the Transportation Security Administration notes that the Industrial Canal levee has been breached. "There is heavy street flooding throughout Orleans, St. Bernard, and Jefferson parishes," the brief notes. A senior watch officer at the Homeland Security Operations Center receives the brief at 11:41 a.m.
9:14 a.m.: A flash flood warning from the National Weather service notes: "A levee breach occurred along the Industrial Canal… 3-8 feet of water is expected."
9:36 a.m.: FEMA coordinator Matthew Green e-mails FEMA's Michael Lowder, deputy director of response, that the Industrial Canal Levee has failed.
10 a.m.: Department of Homeland Security adviser Louis Dabdoub sends an e-mail to officials at Homeland Security and its main operation center. It reads: "It is getting bad. Major flooding in some parts of the city. People are calling in for rescue… The bad part has not hit here yet."
10:12 a.m.: Michael Heath, special assistant to then-FEMA chief Michael Brown, sends an e-mail to FEMA's chief of staff and acting director that reports: "Severe flooding in the St. Bernard/Orleans parish line... People are trapped in attics."
11:51 a.m.: Heath sends an e-mail to Michael Lowder, FEMA's deputy directory of response, informing him that the 17th Street Canal has been breached, as reported by Marty Bahamonde, a FEMA official on the ground in New Orleans. Brown responds: "I'm being told here water over not a breach."
12 p.m.- 5 p.m.: Levee breaches are reported by, among others, the Louisiana State Police, the National Weather Service, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security.
6 p.m.: A report from the Homeland Security Operation Center says: "Preliminary reports indicate the levees in New Orleans have not been breached."
6:08 p.m. The American Red Cross e-mails officials at the White House and Department of Homeland Security about reports of levee breaches and "extensive flooding" in the Lower Ninth Ward and St. Bernard Parish.
9 p.m.: Appearing on CNN, then-FEMA Chief Michael Brown says: "We have some, I'm not going to call them breaches, but we have some areas where the lake and the rivers are continuing to spill over."
9:29 p.m.: John Wood, chief of staff for Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, is sent an e-mail that reads in part: "the first (unconfirmed) reports they are getting from aerial surveys in New Orleans are far more serious than media reports are currently reflecting."
10:30 p.m.: A Homeland Security situation report reads: "There is a quarter-mile [breach] in the levee near the 17th Street Canal… an estimated 2/3 to 75% of the city is under water… a few bodies were seen floating in the water." This report reaches the White House around midnight, according to congressional investigators.
11:05 p.m.: Michael Jackson, deputy secretary of Homeland Security, is sent an e-mail summarizing reports of the extensive flooding that followed the collapse of the 17th Street Canal levee. The reports had been submitted by Marty Bahamonde, a FEMA official on the scene, beginning at 10:12 a.m. that day.
TUESDAY, AUG. 30, 2005
6 a.m.: A Homeland Security situation report states that the Industrial Canal and 17th Street Canal levees have been breached. It says: "Much of downtown and east New Orleans is underwater, depth unknown at this time… Widespread and significant flooding has occurred throughout the city."
Source: Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (See the full timeline released by the Senate committee.)
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5200940
Shaking The House Of Cards
By BOB HERBERT (NYT) 771 words
Published: October 3, 2003
No wonder the sky-high poll numbers for President Bush have collapsed. The fiasco in Iraq is only part of the story. The news on one substantive issue after another could hardly be worse. It's almost as if the president had a team in the White House that was feeding his credibility into a giant shredder.
Despite the administration's relentlessly optimistic chatter about the economy, the Census Bureau reported that the number of Americans living in poverty increased by 1.7 million last year, the second straight annual increase. During those two years, the number of poor Americans has grown by 3 million.
Belt-tightening is also in order for the middle class. The median household income declined by 1.1 percent, a drop of about $500, to $42,400. It was the second straight year for a decline in that category as well.
Per capita income decreased, too. It dropped by 1.8 percent, to $22,794 in 2002, the first decline in more than a decade.
Boom times these ain't.
On Monday we learned that there had been a steep increase last year -- the largest in a decade -- in the number of Americans without health insurance.
The international outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas is reporting that job losses in the U.S. have resulted in a sharp decline in the number of dual-income families, particularly for those with children under 18.
And so on.
With the federal government piling up massive deficits and local governments struggling to provide the most basic of services (some areas are closing schools; others are releasing prisoners prematurely), Mr. Bush is asking the nation to go much further into debt in the service of some vague notion of a civic renaissance in Iraq.
Even Republicans are beginning to ask what the heck is going on.
Contributing to the growing sense of unease in some quarters and outrage in others is the blatant war profiteering in Iraq by politically connected firms like Bechtel and Halliburton -- profiteering that is taking place with the scandalous encouragement and connivance of the Bush administration.
A front-page article in The Times on Tuesday said: ''A group of businessmen linked by their close ties to President Bush, his family and his administration have set up a consulting firm to advise companies that want to do business in Iraq, including those seeking pieces of taxpayer-financed reconstruction projects.''
Iraq is proving to be a bonanza for the Bush administration's corporate cronies even as it is threatening to become a sinkhole for the aspirations of ordinary Americans.
The vicious release to news organizations of the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer could serve as a case study of the character of this administration. The Bush II crowd is arrogant, venal, mean-spirited and contemptuous of law and custom.
The problem it faces now is not just the criminal investigation into who outed Valerie Plame, but also the fact that the public understands this story only too well. Deliberately blowing the cover of an intelligence or law enforcement official for no good reason is considered by nearly all Americans, regardless of their political affiliations, to be a despicable act.
According to an ABC-Washington Post poll, nearly 70 percent of Americans believe a special counsel should be appointed to investigate the leak.
Now that so much has gone haywire -- Iraq, the economy, America's standing in the world -- the tough questions are finally being asked about President Bush and his administration.
Perhaps foreign policy was not Mr. Bush's strength, after all. And even diehard Republicans have been forced to acknowledge that the president was surely wrong when he insisted that his mammoth tax cuts would be the engine of job creation. And nothing has ever come of Mr. Bush's promise to be the education president, or to change the tone of the discourse in Washington, or to deal humbly and respectfully with the rest of the world.
Americans are increasingly asking what went wrong. How could so much have gone sour in such a short period of time?
Was it incompetence? Bad faith?
Loud warnings were ignored for the longest time. Now, finally, the truth is becoming more and more difficult to avoid.
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F10913FC3F580C708CDDA90994DB404482
THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ: ASSESSMENT;
A Reckoning: Iraq Arms Report Poses Test for Bush
By DAVID E. SANGER (NYT) 1039 words
Published: October 3, 2003
The preliminary report delivered on Thursday by the chief arms inspector in Iraq forces the Bush administration to come face to face with this reality: that Saddam Hussein's armory appears to have been stuffed with precursors, potential weapons and bluffs, but that nothing found so far backs up administration claims that Mr. Hussein posed an imminent threat to the world.
In public, President Bush says that is not the issue. What should make a difference to Americans, and to the world, he says, is that Mr. Hussein is gone and Iraq is free. ''One thing is for certain,'' Mr. Bush argued last month at a fund-raiser, using a line he repeats often these days. ''Terrorist groups will not ever be able to get weapons of mass destruction in Iraq because Saddam Hussein is no more.''
But in private, Mr. Bush's political aides concede that it does matter, and it may matter more as the politics of running for president collide with the realities of containing the chaos in occupied Iraq.
While the report by the arms inspector, David Kay, is not final, and while the inspectors may yet come upon a cache of weapons, the preliminary findings support the claims of critics, including Democratic candidates, that Mr. Bush used dubious intelligence to justify his decision to go to war. At worst, these critics say, the usual caveats and cautions of the underlying intelligence reports were ignored in the rush to war.
Without question, the gap between what Mr. Bush said existed in Iraq and what Dr. Kay has failed to find will be argued about again and again as Americans discuss whether it was right to go into Iraq in the first place, and debate what to do now.
''This presents the president with a huge problem'' of explaining why the weapons have not been found, said Lee H. Hamilton, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana and now the president of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington. ''He and his aides have said over and over again that they will find'' unconventional weapons. ''They cannot say that anymore in light of the evidence.''
Mr. Hamilton, who dealt with intelligence issues in Congress, said the problem went beyond politics: it raised questions about whether intelligence could be trusted and used to rally the world to confront the North Korean and Iranian nuclear weapons programs.
Should Mr. Bush or his successors make a new argument for a pre-emptive strike against any country suspected of amassing arms, ''persuading the world will be that much harder,'' Mr. Hamilton said.
Several of Mr. Bush's advisers and associates, speaking under the cover of anonymity, said the issue of what weapons Mr. Hussein possessed would have far less political relevance if the occupation was going smoothly.
But it is not. The effect on voters is evident: a New York Times/CBS News poll released Thursday shows that public approval for how Mr. Bush is handling Iraq has now dropped to 47 percent, down from 75 percent in the midst of the heavy fighting. That is a sign, as one of Mr. Bush's senior aides said Thursday, that ''we have a lot of work to do.''
In retrospect, warning signs were evident well before the war began. There was the running dispute last winter with the International Atomic Energy Agency over the question of whether specialized tubes were intended for Iraqi nuclear centrifuges. In January President Bush argued that Mr. Hussein was seeking uranium in Africa -- a statement that was questioned at the time, discredited this summer and led this week to the first criminal investigation of the Bush White House, revolving around leaks that might have been intended to silence critics.
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, more careful about his claims than the president or the vice president, deleted any mention of the uranium from his presentation to the United Nations on Feb. 5.
But now even Mr. Powell's case has come under question. He made much of the mobile biological weapons laboratories that Mr. Hussein was supposed to be using; Dr. Kay's report said, ''We have not yet been able to corroborate the existence'' of a mobile biological weapons effort.
Dr. Kay paints a picture of a dictator who would be pleased to develop biological and chemical weapons, some complex and others ''small and relatively unsophisticated.''
But a similar case could be made about dictators in many other nations, including some that appear to be far ahead of Iraq. Part of Mr. Bush's task now is to explain why he has not raised the alarm about them as vociferously.
For the Democratic candidates, part of their task is to question whether going to war made sense -- without seeming to suggest that the world would be a better place if Mr. Hussein were still in power.
Dr. Kay's report offers a rationale for going ahead with the weapons search, at a cost that the administration believes will run to $600 million. Even if no caches of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons are found, Dr. Kay said, the search will provide lessons on how to improve ''the quality of intelligence.'' And even if there is ''only a remote possibility'' that aged weapons still exist, he said, it is vital to keep them out of the wrong hands.
Those reasons do little to help Mr. Bush as he, in Mr. Hamilton's phrase, ''revises his list of reasons for going to war.''
Ex post facto explanations of war are difficult anytime. They are even more difficult in the midst of an unpopular occupation, more difficult and dangerous than the one the United States led in Japan and Germany in 1945, and fraught with political dangers for Mr. Bush in 2004.
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F00616FA3F580C708CDDA90994DB404482
Poll Shows Drop in Confidence On Bush Skill in Handling Crises
By TODD S. PURDUM AND JANET ELDER (NYT)
2069 words
Published: October 3, 2003
The public's confidence in President Bush's ability to deal wisely with an international crisis has slid sharply over the past five months, the latest New York Times/CBS News Poll has found. And a clear majority are also uneasy about his ability to make the right decisions on the nation's economy.
Over all, the poll found, Americans are for the first time more critical than not of Mr. Bush's ability to handle both foreign and domestic problems, and a majority say the president does not share their priorities. Thirteen months before the 2004 election, a solid majority of Americans say the country is seriously on the wrong track, a classic danger sign for incumbents, and only about half of Americans approve of Mr. Bush's overall job performance. That is roughly the same as when Mr. Bush took office after the razor-close 2000 election.
But more than 6 in 10 Americans still say the president has strong qualities of leadership, more than 5 in 10 say he has more honesty and integrity than most people in public life and 6 in 10 credit him with making the country safer from terrorist attack.
By contrast, the Democratic presidential contenders remain largely unknown, and nearly half of Americans -- and a like number of registered voters -- say the Democrats have no clear plan of their own for the country.
A summer of continuing attacks on American soldiers in Iraq, the failure so far to find weapons of mass destruction there and Mr. Bush's recent request for $87 billion to pay for military operations and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan have taken a toll on public support for his administration's Iraq policy and on views of his ability to handle such issues in general.
The poll found that just 45 percent of Americans now have confidence in Mr. Bush's ability to deal wisely with an international crisis, down sharply from 66 percent in April, and half now say they are uneasy about his approach. Nearly 9 in 10 Americans say the war in Iraq is still going on, and 6 in 10 say the United States should not spend as much on the effort as Mr. Bush has sought. Three-quarters of Americans, including a majority of Republicans, say the administration has yet to clearly explain how long American troops will have to stay in Iraq, or how much it will cost to rebuild the country.
''I am very uneasy because of the war,'' said Joyce Austin, 69, a retired nurse's aide in Readstown, Wis., who was reinterviewed after the poll was conducted. ''I don't think the Bush administration had a good plan for ending the war, and for what was going to happen afterward. I don't think they realized how much it was going to cost.'' Mrs. Austin paused and added, ''Maybe they knew and just didn't tell us.''
The nationwide telephone poll of 981 adults has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. The poll, taken Sunday through Wednesday, was in progress when the Justice Department announced that it would investigate accusations that someone in the White House may have leaked the name of an undercover C.I.A. officer.
As the week progressed and news coverage of the investigation intensified, respondents were somewhat less likely to credit the Bush administration with bringing heightened honesty and integrity to the workings of the White House, compared with past administrations. In the end, just over one-third of the respondents said the administration had brought more honesty and integrity, while 18 percent said it had brought less and 43 percent said it was about the same as other administrations.
For months, Americans have been critical of Mr. Bush's handling of the national economy, and they remain so, with just one in five saying the administration's policies have made their taxes go down and a near-majority saying the policies have had no effect on them personally. Half of the respondents said the federal tax cuts enacted since 2001 had not made much difference in the economy, and the rest were about evenly divided on whether the tax cuts were bad or good. Just 40 percent of voters expressed confidence in Mr. Bush's ability to make the right decisions about the economy, down from half in April, while 56 percent said they were uneasy, up from 42 percent in April.
During Mr. Bush's tenure, a majority of Americans say, jobs have been lost and not created, there has been no easing of the high cost of prescription drugs and schools have not improved. Six in 10 Americans -- and 4 in 10 Republicans -- say the economy is worse than it was when Mr. Bush took office. Four in 10 of those polled were worried that someone in their household would lose his job in the next year.
Even worse news for the president was that Americans have also become critical of his handling of foreign policy, which had been been seen as his strength for most of his presidency. The latest survey found that 44 percent of those polled approved of Mr. Bush's overall handling of foreign policy, down from 52 percent in July, and that 47 percent approved of his handling of the situation in Iraq, down from 58 percent in July.
Polls last winter showed that public support for the president's decision to go to war in Iraq was sharply divided along partisan lines, with broad indications of reluctance. Now there are growing doubts about whether the results were worth the loss of life and other costs involved. Only 41 percent said it was, while 53 percent said it was not. When the question was asked using Saddam Hussein's name, the results were almost reversed, with about half those surveyed le saying it was worth removing him from power, and 41 percent saying it was not.
Over all, 51 percent of the respondents approved of Mr. Bush's performance. That is down from the high 80's after the Sept. 11 attacks, and from the high 60's at the beginning of the Iraq war. Just over 4 in 10 voters now have a favorable opinion of the president, compared with more than 6 in 10 in mid-2002, and just over 3 in 10 now have an unfavorable opinion compared with 2 in 10 in July 2002.
Nearly half said they believed that removing Mr. Hussein from power was the main reason for taking military action in Iraq. About a quarter said the main reason was to protect the oil supply, and one-fifth said the goal was to stop Iraq from manufacturing weapons. But only about 4 in 10 said they now believed that Mr. Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, compared with about 5 in 10 who said so in April.
More than half of Americans said relations between the United States and its European allies were worse than when Mr. Bush took office, and fewer than half said leaders of other countries around the world had respect for Mr. Bush.
Mary Preble, 46, a registered nurse and a Republican in Sugar Land, Tex., said: ''I don't feel George W. Bush has a grasp on what the public is really interested in.'' She added: ''I wasn't happy about the invasion in Iraq. We shouldn't have attacked before anything was proven. There seem to be no nuclear weapons.
''Right now he is trying to rally everyone around to the cause and give money to rebuild Iraq. But why should other countries kick in cash when he didn't wait until the U.N. said we're behind you? The other countries don't believe he has the leadership skills he should have.''
The poll showed an electorate that remains narrowly divided. When all registered voters were asked whom they would vote for next year, 44 percent said Mr. Bush and 44 percent said the Democratic candidate. But regardless of how they intend to vote, half of registered voters said they expected Mr. Bush to win.
While Mr. Bush's standing has fallen, the poll showed that the Democratic presidential contenders are still largely unknown, and a majority of those who are planning to vote in their states' Democratic primaries or caucus next year have not formed opinions of the candidates.
Opinions of Democratic primary voters are so unformed that the mere mention of a person's title changes the dynamic. When voters were asked which candidate they would choose, without mention of titles, 17 percent said Gen. Wesley K. Clark, 11 percent said Representative Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri and 10 percent said Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut. The other candidates were all in single digits.
''I think the Democrats have a plan, but I'm not sure what it is,'' Laurel Halsey, 34, a personnel manager in Oakland, Calif, said. ''The Democrats' plan is never as clear as the Republicans' because the Republicans focus on the very narrow goal of laissez-faire government and capitalism. The Democrats try to incorporate a broader base of social issues.''
How the Poll Was Conducted
The latest New York Times/CBS News Poll is based on telephone interviews conducted Sunday through Wednesday with 981 adults throughout the United States.
The sample of telephone exchanges called was randomly selected by a computer from a complete list of more than 42,000 active residential exchanges across the country.
Within each exchange, random digits were added to form a complete telephone number, thus permitting access to listed and unlisted numbers alike. Within each household, one adult was designated by a random procedure to be the respondent for the survey.
The results have been weighted to take account of household size and number of telephone lines into the residence and to adjust for variation in the sample relating to geographic region, sex, race, age and education.
In theory, in 19 cases out of 20, the results based on such samples will differ by no more than three percentage points in either direction from what would have been obtained by seeking out all American adults.
For smaller subgroups the margin of sampling error is larger.
In addition to sampling error, the practical difficulties of conducting any survey of public opinion may introduce other sources of error into the poll. Variation in the wording and order of questions, for example, may lead to somewhat different results.
Full results are available at nytimes.com/politics.
Chart: ''Public Perceptions Of President Bush''
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?
Approve: 51%
Disapprove: 42%
Has the Bush administration brought more honesty and integrity to the workings of the White House, less or about the same as other administrations.
More: 35%
Less: 18
Same: 43
No Opinion: 4
Do you have confidence in George W. Bush's ability to deal wisely with an international crisis, or are you uneasy about his approach?
4/03
Confidence: 66%
Uneasy: 31
No Opinion: 3%
10/03
Confidence: 45%
Uneasy: 50
No Opinion: 5
Do you have confidence in George W. Bush's ability to make the right decisions about the nation's economy, or are you uneasy about
4/03
Confidence: 54%
Uneasy: 42
No Opinion: 4
10/03
Confidence: 40%
Uneasy: 56
No Opinion: 4
Do you think the policies of the Bush administration have . . .
. . . increased, decreased or not affected the number of jobs in the U.S.?
Increased: 12%
Decreased: 51
No Effect: 29
No Opinion: 9
. . . made the cost of prescription drugs more expensive, less expensive or have had no effect?
More: 35%
Less: 5
No Effect: 39
No Opinion: 21
. . . made the United States safer from terrorism, less safe or have had no effect?
Safer: 60%
Less Safe: 18
No Effect: 18
No Opinion: 4
. . . made your taxes go up, down or have had no effect?
Go Up: 29%
Go Down: 19
No Effect: 47
No Opinion: 4
Based on nationwide telephone interviews conducted Sept. 28 through Oct. 1 with 981 adults. Numbers may not add up to 100 because of rounding. (pg. A24)
Chart
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling the economy?
Approve: 56%
Disapprove: 37%
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling foreign policy?
Approve: 45%
Disapprove: 44%
(Source by New York Times/CBS News Poll)(pg. A1)
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70A10FA3F580C708CDDA90994DB404482
Korean Claim Leaves U.S. Concerned, But Skeptical
By JAMES BROOKE (NYT) 829 words
Published: October 3, 2003
SEOUL, South Korea, Oct. 2 - North Korea raised the tension in future nuclear talks by saying on Thursday that it is making atomic bombs from plutonium it has reprocessed from 8,000 spent fuel rods. The United States responded that it could not verify the Korean statement, but still took it seriously.
The Bush administration has set a ''red line'' that it would not accept North Korea's export of bombs or of its bomb-making abilities, and a North Korean diplomat said in New York that his nation would not cross that line.
''We have no intention of transferring any means of that nuclear deterrence to other countries,'' Choe Su Hon, North Korea's deputy foreign minister, told reporters at the North's mission to the United Nations in New York, the official New China News Agency reported on Thursday.
In Washington, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, said, ''This is a matter of the most serious concern,'' though he added: ''This is the third time they have told us they'd just finished reprocessing the rods. We have no evidence to confirm that.''
''The North Koreans go out of their way to make these statements from time to time,'' Mr. Powell said. ''And we will continue to pursue diplomacy and not react to each and every one of their statements.''
The fuel rods had been sealed by an international agreement for almost a decade, until last winter, when North Korea expelled United Nations inspectors and started reprocessing them. Mr. Choe told the reporters Wednesday that the North had now completed reprocessing all the stored rods.
If all 8,000 rods have indeed been reprocessed, North Korea would have the plutonium for about 20 bombs, nuclear experts calculate. But the North is not believed to have the expertise to make more than half a dozen in six months. The C.I.A.'s public estimate is that North Korea has one or two nuclear bombs.
New rods from a newly restarted research reactor will be reprocessed and ''churned out in an unbroken chain,'' the Korean Central News Agency said. It quoted an unidentified spokesman for the North's Foreign Ministry as saying that the reprocessing was aimed at increasing the nation's ''nuclear deterrent force.''
The restarted reactor, of five megawatts, is at Yongbyon, and is believed capable of producing enough plutonium for one or two bombs a year.
North Korea, run by a Stalinist dictatorship for almost six decades, is largely closed to foreign reporters, and American officials and it was impossible to make an independent check of the government's claims. The United States is believed to gather information from sensing devices in the North Korean capital and on China's border and from low flights by American spy planes.
''There is no way to verify what they are saying, but that does not mean it is not true,'' Scott Snyder, a Korea expert for the Asia Foundation, an American research institute, said here Thursday. Mr. Snyder, the author of ''Negotiating on the Edge,'' a book on North Korean bargaining tactics, added, ''The North Koreans have commonly used crisis escalation as a vehicle to draw attention to their issues and shape the environment in ways that they feel suit their purposes.''
All of North Korea's immediate neighbors -- China, Russia and South Korea -- are expecting to engage in six-nation talks that are expected to resume in Beijing by the end of November.
South Korea's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Shin Bong Kil, said, ''The North's announcement was very regrettable.''
''We are deeply concerned it not only undermines inter-Korean relations and efforts for the peaceful resolution of the nuclear issues but hurts the atmosphere for dialogue set by the previous talks,'' he said in a statement.
Recent comments by North Korea were a ''tactic to boost its negotiating power,'' Cho Kun Shik, South Korea's deputy unification minister, told reporters at a briefing on Thursday.
By claiming to have a nuclear arsenal and the ability to make it grow, the North could gain leverage at the next round of talks. The possession of half a dozen bombs could also give the North the luxury of conducting a test.
The North's tough stance comes after a military parade here in Seoul, where South Korea showed off new military hardware for the first time in years. On Wednesday, South Korea's Air Force dragged through the streets of downtown Seoul batteries of new Popeye air-to-ground missiles. Later, South Korea's president, Roh Moo Hyun, announced an 8 percent increase in military spending, one of the biggest jumps in recent years.
http://select.nytimes.com/search/restricted/article?res=F70F1EF73C580C708CDDA90994DB404482
No More Mr. Tough Guy
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Published: February 8, 2006
I've always thought Dick Cheney took national security seriously. I don't anymore. It seems that Mr. Cheney is so convinced that we have no choice but to be dependent on crude oil, so convinced that conservation is just some silly liberal hobby, that he will never seriously summon the country to kick its oil habit, never summon it to do anything great.
Indeed, he seems determined to be a drag on any serious effort to make America energy-independent. He presents all this as a tough-guy "realist" view of the world. But it's actually an ignorant and naïve view — one that underestimates what Americans can do, and totally misses how the energy question has overtaken Iraq as the most important issue in U.S. foreign policy. If he persists, Mr. Cheney is going to ensure that the Bush team squanders its last three years — and a lot more years for the country.
Listen to Mr. Cheney's answer when the conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham asked him how he reacted to my urgings for a gasoline tax to push all Americans to drive energy-saving vehicles and make us energy-independent — now.
"Well, I don't agree with that," Mr. Cheney said. "I think — the president and I believe very deeply that, obviously, the government has got a role to play here in terms of supporting research into new technologies and encouraging the development of new methods of generating energy. ... But we also are big believers in the market, and that we need to be careful about having government come in, for example, and tell people how to live their lives. ... This notion that we have to 'impose pain,' some kind of government mandate, I think we would resist. The marketplace does work out there."
What is he talking about? The global oil market is anything but free. It's controlled by the world's largest cartel — OPEC — which sets output, and thereby prices, according to the needs of some of the worst regimes in the world. By doing nothing, we are letting their needs determine the price and their treasuries reap all the profits.
Also, why does Mr. Cheney have no problem influencing the market by lowering taxes to get consumers to spend, but he rejects raising gasoline taxes to get consumers to save energy — a fundamental national interest.
Don't take it from me. Gregory Mankiw of Harvard, who recently retired as chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, wrote in The Wall Street Journal on Jan. 3 about his New Year's resolutions: "Everyone hates taxes, but the government needs to fund its operations, and some taxes can actually do some good in the process. I will tell the American people that a higher tax on gasoline is better at encouraging conservation than are heavy-handed [mileage standards]. It would not only encourage people to buy more fuel-efficient cars, but it would encourage them to drive less."
Mr. Cheney, we are told, is a "tough guy." Really? Well, how tough is this: We have a small gasoline tax, but Europe and Japan tax their gasoline by $2 and $3 a gallon, or more. They use those taxes to build schools, highways and national health care for their citizens. But they spend very little on defense compared with us.
So who protects their oil supplies from the Middle East? U.S. taxpayers. We spend nearly $600 billion a year on defense, a large chunk in the Persian Gulf. But how do we pay for that without a gas tax? Income taxes and Social Security. Yes, we tax our incomes and raid our children's Social Security fund so Europeans and Japanese can comfortably import their oil from the gulf, impose big gas taxes on it at their pumps and then use that income for their own domestic needs. And because they have high gas taxes, they also beat Detroit at making more fuel-efficient cars. Now how tough is that?
Finally, if Mr. Cheney believes so much in markets, why did the 2005 energy act contain about $2 billion in tax breaks for oil companies? Why does his administration permit a 54-cents-a-gallon tax on imported ethanol — fuel made from sugar or corn — so Brazilian sugar exports won't compete with American sugar? Yes, we tax imported ethanol from Brazil, but we don't tax imported oil from Saudi Arabia, Venezuela or Russia.
"Everyone says we need a new Marshall Plan," said Michael Mandelbaum, a foreign policy expert and the author of "The Case for Goliath." "We have a Marshall Plan. It's our energy policy. It's a Marshall plan for terrorists and dictators."
How tough is it, Mr. Cheney, to will the ends — an end to America's oil addiction — but not will the means: a gasoline tax? It's not very tough, it's not very smart, and it's going to end badly for us.
http://select.nytimes.com/mem/tnt.html?emc=tnt&tntget=2006/02/08/opinion/08friedman.html&tntemail0=y
continued ...
