So, Trump is screaming no collusion, huh?

To prove further corruption, there is the issue of LIMITING speech within the prosecution. The judge would not allow the words Russian Collusion in the courtroom. The reason could be because there is no specific law that uses the word collusion as it's stated statute. 

I have to wonder with or without new evidence if an appeal to the restrictions of language is a possibility?

When Trump starts screaming NO Conspiracy it might get more interesting.

We already know there was a conspiracy with the testimony of Michael Cohen. There was definitely men, including Trump, conspiring to hide the truth from the American people. He can say it was to protect his wife, but, if that was known to the American people at the time the conspiracy was taking place, the election would have had a different outcome.

The women that were conspired against were coming forward to speak to the people, not Mrs. Trump.