As to Hillary Clinton:
The guy that is getting amnesty from prosecution would not cooperate at all. He evidently was excising his 5th Amendment rights.
Earlier the former Secretary Hillary Clinton stated, "...I wish he would just talk to the FBI and clear all this stuff up...." Those may not have been her exact words. I have trouble seeing her say "stuff."
But, this is most probably the FBI cleaning up details before they finalize their report. There may be more questions after he gives his testimony, but, perhaps not. We just have to wait and see if anything develops.
It was an attempt at being scandalous back in September 2015. This is from "The Washington Times," not the Washington Post. The Washington Times used to sell for 25 cents about ten years ago and it probably still does.
September 9, 2015
By Victor Morton
The guy that is getting amnesty from prosecution would not cooperate at all. He evidently was excising his 5th Amendment rights.
Earlier the former Secretary Hillary Clinton stated, "...I wish he would just talk to the FBI and clear all this stuff up...." Those may not have been her exact words. I have trouble seeing her say "stuff."
But, this is most probably the FBI cleaning up details before they finalize their report. There may be more questions after he gives his testimony, but, perhaps not. We just have to wait and see if anything develops.
It was an attempt at being scandalous back in September 2015. This is from "The Washington Times," not the Washington Post. The Washington Times used to sell for 25 cents about ten years ago and it probably still does.
September 9, 2015
By Victor Morton
...The lawyer for the man (click here) who set up and oversaw Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email server — and asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination on the subject — says his client will not give congressional panels an advance look at what he might say if he were to testify.
Republican Sens. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin have been negotiating a possible “proffer” — a legal term for a preliminary overview on what a potential witness might say — in order to determine whether to offer Bryan Pagliano immunity from prosecution in exchange for his testimony....
There is no reason for the Public Option to be an experiment. Massachusetts has had a public option for a long time. It is time to go forward with it.
March 3, 2016
By Seth Chandler
Presidential candidate (click here) Hillary Clinton has revived recently the idea of adding a “public option” to the Exchanges. Apparently, at least for now, she would permit or perhaps encourage each state to create a publicly operated insurer that would augment private insurers in selling health insurance policies to individuals. Her website suggests she would not mandate a public option at the federal level — at least for now — or somehow force the states to create one. All of that would require her to push legislation through Congress. The “encouraged” public option, by contrast, could be implemented by cooperation between states and the federal executive without a need for any revisions to the Affordable Care Act....
There is no reason for the Public Option to be an experiment. Massachusetts has had a public option for a long time. It is time to go forward with it.
March 3, 2016
By Seth Chandler
Presidential candidate (click here) Hillary Clinton has revived recently the idea of adding a “public option” to the Exchanges. Apparently, at least for now, she would permit or perhaps encourage each state to create a publicly operated insurer that would augment private insurers in selling health insurance policies to individuals. Her website suggests she would not mandate a public option at the federal level — at least for now — or somehow force the states to create one. All of that would require her to push legislation through Congress. The “encouraged” public option, by contrast, could be implemented by cooperation between states and the federal executive without a need for any revisions to the Affordable Care Act....
