US Senator Corker seems to believe every abortion needs due process. Oh, Wow, Planned Parenthood is funded by the Chinese. And Senator Corker doesn't need an investigation to prove it.
He equates the Chinese harvesting of organs from criminals on their way to the death chamber and the abortions in the USA.
So, there it is, women are to be given the death sentence for having an abortion or even thinking about it.
There are hideous people in the US Senate and Corker is one of them.
Of course the movement beyond the ideology by Corker is one that women are loose with their morals when becoming pregnant. And of course becoming pregnant means having sex with a man.
I am kind of curious as to a difference between married women having sex with men and unmarried women having sex with men.
I am also curious if there is a difference between atheist women having sex with men and orthodox Christians having sex with men.
See, it would seem as though God is in the due process of pregnant women, so where there is a difference in religious beliefs between women having sex with men in the USA, does "the God standard" hold up?
I have a better idea. I strongly suggest, to insure the freedom of women having sex with men, there be a law requiring a chastity belt at birth that is changed as often as the girth of these women change. At least with a chastity belt women will still have the right of upward movement out of poverty as soon as child care costs less than her anticipated wages.
The real beauty to this readily available product is that it eliminates vaginal rape and incest.
I wonder if it's made in China. Maybe instead of a second VW factory in Tennessee, Corker can induce the manufacturing of the item to the USA. There would be jobs at least even if employees don't have women's health insurance.
He equates the Chinese harvesting of organs from criminals on their way to the death chamber and the abortions in the USA.
So, there it is, women are to be given the death sentence for having an abortion or even thinking about it.
There are hideous people in the US Senate and Corker is one of them.
Of course the movement beyond the ideology by Corker is one that women are loose with their morals when becoming pregnant. And of course becoming pregnant means having sex with a man.
I am kind of curious as to a difference between married women having sex with men and unmarried women having sex with men.
I am also curious if there is a difference between atheist women having sex with men and orthodox Christians having sex with men.
See, it would seem as though God is in the due process of pregnant women, so where there is a difference in religious beliefs between women having sex with men in the USA, does "the God standard" hold up?
I have a better idea. I strongly suggest, to insure the freedom of women having sex with men, there be a law requiring a chastity belt at birth that is changed as often as the girth of these women change. At least with a chastity belt women will still have the right of upward movement out of poverty as soon as child care costs less than her anticipated wages.
The real beauty to this readily available product is that it eliminates vaginal rape and incest.
I wonder if it's made in China. Maybe instead of a second VW factory in Tennessee, Corker can induce the manufacturing of the item to the USA. There would be jobs at least even if employees don't have women's health insurance.