"Morning Papers"
The Rooster
"Okeydoke"
"Careerism" is part of the game to take Hillary down. Individuals are due to gain if Hillary Clinton is defeated. It is called corruption.
I think most those that actually realize Hillary Clinton is the best candidate in the field are not surprised of the domination of the 'tabloid' component to most if not all of the reporting surrounding her.
Joe Scarborough is among the best examples of those in the Republican party that are so heavily invested in 'the lie' they believe it and propagate it. I really think it is up to the campaign to demand equal time from all these media sources.
The campaign should have a written contract based in 'truth telling' to correct the continued propaganda. All these sources are achieving goals that lead to profits. They can't be allowed to continue to lie.
Let's face it, the media allowed and propagated the 'idea' Iraq was responsible for September 11th. To this day that lie continues to bring in voters to elections. The demand for 'clearing' Hillary Clinton of their lies has to be at least six months in length since they have gotten six months of unprecedented income and popularity from same.
The 'reverse campaign' has to be as long and with has much fervor as the lies and SLANDER.
BROCK: (click here) Our charter is conservative misinformation wherever you find it, and as far as coverage of the Clintons go, there's been a lot of misinformation in The New York Times, particularly in the last few months, where really on three occasions, Hillary Clinton was accused of, essentially, criminal conduct. All of those stories fake and wrong, having walked back by The New York Times. And, I think, if you go back and really scrutinize the coverage, as I do in this book, the inescapable conclusion is that there's an institutional bias there against the Clintons. And, I think, with The New York Times, it's the newspaper of record, it's the gold standard. And it has a liberal editorial line. So you put all that together, and it's uniquely damaging, I think, to have a Republican operatives manipulating a paper like that.
The Rooster
"Okeydoke"
"Careerism" is part of the game to take Hillary down. Individuals are due to gain if Hillary Clinton is defeated. It is called corruption.
I think most those that actually realize Hillary Clinton is the best candidate in the field are not surprised of the domination of the 'tabloid' component to most if not all of the reporting surrounding her.
Joe Scarborough is among the best examples of those in the Republican party that are so heavily invested in 'the lie' they believe it and propagate it. I really think it is up to the campaign to demand equal time from all these media sources.
The campaign should have a written contract based in 'truth telling' to correct the continued propaganda. All these sources are achieving goals that lead to profits. They can't be allowed to continue to lie.
Let's face it, the media allowed and propagated the 'idea' Iraq was responsible for September 11th. To this day that lie continues to bring in voters to elections. The demand for 'clearing' Hillary Clinton of their lies has to be at least six months in length since they have gotten six months of unprecedented income and popularity from same.
The 'reverse campaign' has to be as long and with has much fervor as the lies and SLANDER.
BROCK: (click here) Our charter is conservative misinformation wherever you find it, and as far as coverage of the Clintons go, there's been a lot of misinformation in The New York Times, particularly in the last few months, where really on three occasions, Hillary Clinton was accused of, essentially, criminal conduct. All of those stories fake and wrong, having walked back by The New York Times. And, I think, if you go back and really scrutinize the coverage, as I do in this book, the inescapable conclusion is that there's an institutional bias there against the Clintons. And, I think, with The New York Times, it's the newspaper of record, it's the gold standard. And it has a liberal editorial line. So you put all that together, and it's uniquely damaging, I think, to have a Republican operatives manipulating a paper like that.