Let's see if I get this right.
Joe Scarborough states the newspapers he is reading states The Clinton Foundation received a huge donation from Algeria and then Algeria was removed from the terror list.
It was proved that was a lie because the only way to remove a country from the terror list involves a process with Congress.
The truth is more than likely any monies received by The Clinton Foundation are matching funds met with private donors. Those monies will be turned back into the country with greater capacity and an expertise from the Foundation to make it happen.
Moving countries forward is complicated and often is more about building better international relationships. The State Department can't have the same expertise as The Clinton Foundation. The Foundation has much more time and freedom to help countries understand how they have to create a more productive infrastructure including legislation.
So, The Clinton Foundation is a uniquely qualified to provide necessary services to change the trajectory of an entire country of people. Their processes to achieve those goals is as complicated as the Former President and the Former Secretary themselves. Otherwise anyone could do this. We have already noted a unique demand by an international community and the people of the USA to shun retirement and engage a foundation that can continue to carry out his directives.
So, now that the Republicans have been proved liars to the idea of freelancing terrorists and their supports; the Clintons now are acting on Human Rights Statistics in their negligence of protecting the USA.
Excuse me.
The 'descriptive' words to insight anger in the Public Court to defame Hillary is again a 'designer use of any law international or domestic.' The result is obvious. In both cases the Republicans are seeking to leverage "Hate of Hillary" as the most slippery candidate in the field.
This needs to end and the Republicans have issues to address. What are they afraid of is more the correct 'descriptive' words in the equation.
Joe Scarborough states the newspapers he is reading states The Clinton Foundation received a huge donation from Algeria and then Algeria was removed from the terror list.
It was proved that was a lie because the only way to remove a country from the terror list involves a process with Congress.
The truth is more than likely any monies received by The Clinton Foundation are matching funds met with private donors. Those monies will be turned back into the country with greater capacity and an expertise from the Foundation to make it happen.
Moving countries forward is complicated and often is more about building better international relationships. The State Department can't have the same expertise as The Clinton Foundation. The Foundation has much more time and freedom to help countries understand how they have to create a more productive infrastructure including legislation.
So, The Clinton Foundation is a uniquely qualified to provide necessary services to change the trajectory of an entire country of people. Their processes to achieve those goals is as complicated as the Former President and the Former Secretary themselves. Otherwise anyone could do this. We have already noted a unique demand by an international community and the people of the USA to shun retirement and engage a foundation that can continue to carry out his directives.
So, now that the Republicans have been proved liars to the idea of freelancing terrorists and their supports; the Clintons now are acting on Human Rights Statistics in their negligence of protecting the USA.
Excuse me.
The 'descriptive' words to insight anger in the Public Court to defame Hillary is again a 'designer use of any law international or domestic.' The result is obvious. In both cases the Republicans are seeking to leverage "Hate of Hillary" as the most slippery candidate in the field.
This needs to end and the Republicans have issues to address. What are they afraid of is more the correct 'descriptive' words in the equation.
