If those type of problems were to be completely avoided, the debate committee needed to refuse access to the stage by staffers completely and provided their own staff to pass urgent messages to the candidiates. I mean the mess could have been catatrophic if Ms. Sink sincerely received bad news about her daughter while sitting there.
The questions already asked were answered. The questions to come were not known to anyone. And the message is basicaly benign in that it was an enthusiastic 'touch of details' to her presentation to the camera. There was no coaching and Scott had no right to complain. There were no details to an answer given and the complaint was baseless. It was at a time when the candidates were relaxed and taking a break. Ms. Sink did not seek information or ask for the cell phone. She clearly didn't have any control over the moment and she is a MOTHER. It was a vulnerable moment of Ms. Sink and one has to wonder if the staffer was actually paid by Scott.
The questions already asked were answered. The questions to come were not known to anyone. And the message is basicaly benign in that it was an enthusiastic 'touch of details' to her presentation to the camera. There was no coaching and Scott had no right to complain. There were no details to an answer given and the complaint was baseless. It was at a time when the candidates were relaxed and taking a break. Ms. Sink did not seek information or ask for the cell phone. She clearly didn't have any control over the moment and she is a MOTHER. It was a vulnerable moment of Ms. Sink and one has to wonder if the staffer was actually paid by Scott.
Jeeze !
Why does Scott insist on distracting from the issues, is the real question?
..."After the debate tonight, (click title to entry - thank you) one of my campaign advisers admitted he tried to communicate with me during one of the breaks," Sink said in the statement. "While he told me it was out of anger with Rick Scott's repeated distortion of facts, it was a foolish thing to do. It violated a debate agreement and I immediately removed him from the campaign."...
What is amazing at all is the criminal background of Scott. What does anyone believe he is going to do as Governor? Do they believe he is going to be a benevolent Governor or just one that will 'set himself up' for when he is no longer in office? I wish people had better memories these days.
Scott has proven he is not trustworthy, so why trust him now?
What is amazing at all is the criminal background of Scott. What does anyone believe he is going to do as Governor? Do they believe he is going to be a benevolent Governor or just one that will 'set himself up' for when he is no longer in office? I wish people had better memories these days.
Scott has proven he is not trustworthy, so why trust him now?
