Trump is guilty. Period. Full stop. The evidence is overwhelming.
If D. A. Willis has full confidence in Nathan Wade then there is no other question necessary.
If D.A. Willis and Nathan Wade found comfort and/or pleasure in each other’s company for a period time that is the end of the discussion. They are allowed to seek social connections where they find them.
Nathan Wade is perfectly capable of prosecution of an obvious case of guilt by Trump. He was judged on his ability and not his personal experience with the D.A.. I applaud D.A. Willis for being brave enough to have a supportive relationship with a colleague at a time when both found comfort in the relationship.
To insinuate a defendant can bring about a private investigation of a prosecutor to destroy their reputation in order to have a case dismissed in the face of obvious guilt is an outrage. This tactic by Trump’s lawyers should add to the brevity of the charges filed against their client. Such a tactic is highly unethical and should be on review by the Georgia Bar of the Trump lawyers.
