By Timothy Gardner
Washington - Former U.S. State Department and nuclear regulatory officials (click here) on Tuesday urged the U.S. Energy Department to reconsider a plan to use bomb-grade uranium in a nuclear power experiment, saying that its use could encourage such tests in other countries.
The Energy Department and two companies aim to share costs on the Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment (MCRE) at the Idaho National Laboratory and use more than 1,322 pounds (600 kg) of fuel containing 93% enriched uranium....
If one really wants to know about uranium there is an agency within the United Nations that knows just about everything there is to know about uranium. The professional agency that handles the entire world's knowledge of uranium and its current use is the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (click here).
In an age of bringing society to answer for it's Wall Street permissions of "Forever Chemicals," (click here) I find it really hard to believe this attempt to bring more danger to the world is nothing short of covert and one of those Wall Street "slick" ways to allow profits where they should be FORBIDDEN. Not all profits are good profits for Wall Street and the PFAS movement proves that.
This nuclear focus by people who believe using weapons grade uranium is a good idea is not only wrong headed, but, it compromises national security in that if this begins in the USA it will take hold elsewhere and the IAEA will have no real purpose except to warn everyone of the error of their ways.
In case the right political wing of the USA continues to laugh at the United Nations as a pariah organization, their role in the Zaporizhzhia power plant was vital. The members of the IAEA were not only brilliant in bringing the information to the public, they were absolutely brave enough to go to the plant to report on the structural insults brought about by the war initiated by Russia. This agency is vital to any and all peaceful use of nuclear power. They are also vital to any movement that might be left to denuclearization Earth and the foolish brinkmanship that is carried out by the communists.
The idea weapons grade uranium would be on the loose in the use of power generation is not only dangerous, but, completely unnecessary. In my opinion, the US Department of Energy has been allowed to develop policies as loose as the former President of the USA. This idea is a bad idea and needs to be put away in the annals of stupidity.
All of Wall Street profits are not good ideas. Let's see if I can account for a few of them; the petroleum industry, internal combustion engine, PFAS, attempts to profit off the poor Chinese people allowing it's communist government to seek power over the world rather than peaceful use of monetary power, bringing the f#*^king cyber world into the world while launching artificial intelligence on every phone to gather personal data, and inventing social media which is a threat to democracy. Those are just a few of the aspects of Wall Street of which I would rather have seen eliminated rather than propagated. This use of weapon's grade uranium has to be the ultimate insult to the intelligence of the American people.
By Sarah Zielinski
Uranium is element 92 on the periodic table–every molecule has 92 protons in its nucleus. The number of neutrons can vary, and that’s the difference between the three isotopes of uranium that we find here on Earth. Uranium-238 (92 protons plus 146 neutrons) is the most abundant form, and about 99.3 percent of all uranium is U-238. The rest is U-235 (0.7 percent), with a trace amount of U-234....
