November 18, 2020
By Jeremy Stahl
On Wednesday, (click here) a federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected the Trump campaign’s request for an additional evidentiary hearing over its effort to invalidate the vote in the state over a set of technicalities. The rejection didn’t deter the Trump campaign, though, which a few hours later requested to file an amendment to its already amended complaint, asking the judge in the case to throw out the entire election in Pennsylvania and declare Donald Trump the winner, an argument that already failed in state court. The new request was signed by Rudy Giuliani, who just one day earlier had appeared on behalf of a client as a lawyer in court for the first time in nearly three decades.
You may have heard that Giuliani’s appearance before the court on Tuesday did not go well. “I’ve never seen worse lawyering in an election law case in my life,” University of California–Irvine School of Law professor and Slate contributor Richard Hasen tweeted....
On Wednesday, (click here) a federal judge in Pennsylvania rejected the Trump campaign’s request for an additional evidentiary hearing over its effort to invalidate the vote in the state over a set of technicalities. The rejection didn’t deter the Trump campaign, though, which a few hours later requested to file an amendment to its already amended complaint, asking the judge in the case to throw out the entire election in Pennsylvania and declare Donald Trump the winner, an argument that already failed in state court. The new request was signed by Rudy Giuliani, who just one day earlier had appeared on behalf of a client as a lawyer in court for the first time in nearly three decades.
You may have heard that Giuliani’s appearance before the court on Tuesday did not go well. “I’ve never seen worse lawyering in an election law case in my life,” University of California–Irvine School of Law professor and Slate contributor Richard Hasen tweeted....
Trump doesn't care about "the way" he stays in office, he simply expects to keep the presidency.
If I thought I had the Supreme Court in my back pocket what does the legal argument matter so long as it makes it to the court?
There is also the dreamscape of Trump that certification of the election will never be made, hence, the final decision will fall to the US House where there are more Red States than the Blue States when the states each have only one vote without any respect to the population of those states.
He is remaining quiet because he doesn't want to give himself away knowing how he talks with abandon.
I fully believe Giuliani is a full partner to stealing the election from the American people. He wants an evidentiary hearing.
An evidentiary hearing is a legal court proceeding that involves eyewitness testimony, given under oath, that's relevant to the case. The presiding judge will hear and take into consideration live eyewitness evidence presented during the hearing in order to make a fair ruling.
The Trump poll monitors have been providing complaints based on hearsay only. They make statements about what they believe is wrongful conduct within the election workers and "the count." That is testimony Giuliani wants to bankroll for the purpose of a hearing that can make it to the Supreme Court for them to disqualify the election.
Trump and Giuliani are attempting both to prevent certification of election results and pursue an evidentiary hearing to have all those worthless statements by poll observers validated and canceling the election.
There simply is not that much corruption of the election anywhere EXCEPT when considering Lindsay Graham is advocating corruption by example in Georgia.
Graham, Giuliani, and Trump are seeking ways to cancel the election.
The Deep State.
Poor Trump is always so oppressed by the Deep State.
