Hatchery fish add to a better outcome of depleted wild stock.

"Wild Estonian and Russian sea trout (Salmo trutta) in Finnish coastal sea trout catches;" Results of genetic mixed stock analysis." Koljonen, M-L and Riho Gross.  Hereditas 151(6):177-95 · December 2014.

For responsible (click here) fisheries management of threatened species, it is essential to know the composition of catches and the extent to which fisheries exploit weak wild populations. The threatened Estonian, Finnish and Russian sea trout populations in the Gulf of Finland are targets of mixed-stock fisheries. The fish may originate from rivers with varying production capacities, from different countries, and they may also have either a wild or hatchery origin. In order to resolve the composition of Finnish coastal sea trout catches, we created a standardized baseline dataset of 15 DNA microsatellite loci for 59 sea trout populations around the Gulf of Finland and tested its resolution for mixed-stock analysis of 1372 captured fish. The baseline dataset provided sufficient resolution for reliable mixture analysis at regional group level, and also for most of the individual rivers stocks. The majority (76-80%) of the total catch originated from Finnish sea trout populations, 6-9% came from Russian and 12-15% from Estonian populations. Nearly all Finnish trout in the catch were of hatchery origin, while the Russian and Estonian trout were mostly of wild origin. The proportion of fish in the Finnish catches that originated from rivers with natural production was at least one fifth (22%, 19-23%). Two different spotting patterns were observed among the captured trout, with a small and sparsely spotted form being markedly more common among individuals of Russian (28%) and Estonian origin (22%) than among fish assigned to a Finnish origin (0.7%)....

The dark areas on the three charts to the left are hatchery fish. It appears after years of stagnant growth, the hatchery fish helped push the wild fish to a higher overall population. Several reasons, the hatchery fish were caught in nets reducing the numbers of wild caught. The hatchery fish also breed in the wild, increasing the young born. Whatever the reason, adding hatchery fish to the wild stock improved their outcomes.

"Annual changes in the proportions of wild and hatchery Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) caught in the Baltic Sea." Koljonen, M-L. 2006. e ICES Journal of Marine Science, 63: 1274e1285. 

DNA-level information (click here) from an eight-loci microsatellite baseline database of 32 Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) stocks was used with a Bayesian estimation method to assess the stock and stock group proportions of Finnish salmon catches in the Baltic Sea area. The proportions of seven stock groups, important to fisheries management, were assessed in catch samples taken between 2000 and 2005. In the Gulf of Bothnia area, the proportion of wild fish in catches showed an increasing trend in all areas until 2003, mainly because of the decrease in total catches caused by the relatively greater mortality of hatchery-reared fish compared with wild fish. In 2004, the total number of wild fish caught had also increased, indicating an increase in the abundance of wild stocks. In catches from the Å land Sea, the proportion of wild fish increased from 44% in 2000 to 70% in 2004, while the catch during the same period increased from 4628 to 7329 fish. In the Gulf of Finland, the local Neva salmon stock, which is released by Estonia, Finland, and Russia, made the largest contribution. In the western part of the Gulf of Finland, fish originating in the Baltic Main Basin also made a substantial contribution to catches. The threatened eastern Estonian and Russian wild stocks were recorded only in the western part of the Gulf of Finland, where the proportion of wild fish increased from 9% in 2003 to 19% in 2004.

Fish hatchery in West Virginia, USA