Evidently, whom ever decided it was okay to bring enhanced opportunity to the Islamic State can now find haven in other countries, because, this has to be illegal in the USA. The area code for Texas City is 409.
Why would this be illegal? Because they are arming opposition to the USA's participation in Syria. The Arab Coalition is in alliance with the USA. This is exceptionally illegal.
We know the Islamic State has money because it sells oil. It doesn't care if the price of oil falls because it never made an investment for the infrastructure. The Islamic State stole the land from Syria and from Syrians. They have money and it is possible they hired and continue to hire soldiers from across the globe, including Great Britain, Australia and otherwise.
The Islamic State is a mercenary organization to begin with. It exchanges loyalty for money, housing, etc. The Islamic State even promises that guarantee there are brides to spawn the children of the caliphate. That is not a definition of a sovereign power. Those that get involved with the Islamic State have anticipations upon their arrival, it is an understood contract.
The Islamic State isn't even a warlord. Warlords have the ability 'to attract' individuals without loyalties to simply be on the winning side and be alive. The Islamic State only allows certain religious affiliations. The Islamic State discriminates it's participants, as a rule warlords don't, it is why young Muslim men were a part of a jihad movement in Afghanistan.
The Islamic State is based in a commercial enterprise with wealth assets and promises of a fantasized life. Basically, the Islamic State is promising virgins and abundance of them and the riches of living "islamic" as their incentive. They are bringing heaven into reality. There is no sacrifice needed to be a member of the Islamic State. Participants come and go from the Islamic State as they please. It is club that practices genocide.
December 20, 2014
By Haaertz
A Texas plumber (click here) whose truck was photographed serving as a jihadist anti-aircraft gun platform in Syria says he has no idea how it ended up thousands of kilometers away in the war-torn country, according to a report by CBS News....
...Oberholtzer said he had traded in the truck to second-hand dealership three years previously. He left the decal on the truck in the expectation that the dealership would remove it.
A spokesman for the dealer said that they had passed it on to a car auction house, Oberholtzer has been besieged by phone calls — some threatening — since the picture was posted. “A few of the people are really ugly,” he told The Galveston Daily News.
Later in the week, federal Homeland Security officials arrived at Mark-1 Plumbing to question Oberholtzer and his staff.
The Islamic State is the one sincere reason and example of why the different religious nations in the Middle East need to find peace between them. If the countries are divided among each other it is far easier for the Islamic State to find favor among them and spread their poison.
The moral to the story is don't sell anything with identifying marks. When one stops to realize the extent this could cause problems for individuals in the USA or elsewhere, removing the identification of the business should have occurred with the initial owner.
The pick-up at some point left the USA. Why? Who?
This concept that the USA military wants to say this is a group unlike any others isn't really that new. The only reason it stands out is because of it's ability to kill and take land away from sovereign authorities. There have been young Muslim men from around the world conducting jihad for a long time. They enter Pakistan and move toward any uprising in the area.
I don't like to just refer to Mr. Walker Lindh over and over, but, most folks know this episode in his life. It is how John Walker Lindh found himself in the conflict in Afghanistan. He didn't go there to fight the USA, he went there to fight jihad (the moral war). The Islamic State is based in that same ideology. They simply have been more successful because of the Ba'athists and their military knowledge.
I might add that religious grounds are not recognized as permission to commit treason. The First Amendment allows for practice of religion INSIDE the sovereign borders of the USA, it has no validity otherwise. The exception would be USA miltiary soldiers stationed abroad, but, even that would be limited to the base and/or ship belong to the USA. So, men or women seeking the life of a jihadist is romanticizing their ideology to the extreme of becoming an enemy of the USA.
Americans can go on non-violent pilgrimages. That isn't even in question, get a passport and go to find new and interesting aspects of one's religion, but, picking up a weapon and entering battle is an entirely different decision by any individual.
I'll tell you want I think is lacking with these circumstances regarding the Muslim faith and jihad, is clear language crafted in a law to deny any American from leaving in practice of his or her faith to be a part of jihad abroad. I would go so far as to state this religious practice is recognition of any individual engaging in such practice or support as enemies of the USA. In that is the reality the USA will add their names to "Most Wanted." To do otherwise, even in Great Britain, is ridiculous.
The USA has allies in the Middle East and Far East, so to allow such activity is to carry sovereign authority to war with allies. How can a sovereign authority give permission in any sense to allow holy men or women to recruit Americans, Australians or the English to fight in a foreign land. A measure this strong has to spell out clearly the consequences of their actions abroad and to that end enforced. The Mosques have to be notified that while their practice of the faith is unencumbered in the USA, the USA ends that freedom with recruitment of a fighting force abroad.
I really do believe any internet access to young minds and hearts in the USA that seek recruitment is as illegal as participating in the war. The access should be denied. The internet access of jihadist extremists compromises the Mosques and their protection of the faithful. It is an open venue to invite the Mosques into participation and condoning the exercise of fitting jihad.
I once ran across a page in a US Government website that stated, "If you go past this page it is considered a felony of the USA." Seriously. I don't know how I did that, but, with such a page I automatically decided I didn't need any information that bad. If I can be successfully censored by the authority of the sovereign USA then so can everyone else.
Why would this be illegal? Because they are arming opposition to the USA's participation in Syria. The Arab Coalition is in alliance with the USA. This is exceptionally illegal.
We know the Islamic State has money because it sells oil. It doesn't care if the price of oil falls because it never made an investment for the infrastructure. The Islamic State stole the land from Syria and from Syrians. They have money and it is possible they hired and continue to hire soldiers from across the globe, including Great Britain, Australia and otherwise.
The Islamic State is a mercenary organization to begin with. It exchanges loyalty for money, housing, etc. The Islamic State even promises that guarantee there are brides to spawn the children of the caliphate. That is not a definition of a sovereign power. Those that get involved with the Islamic State have anticipations upon their arrival, it is an understood contract.
The Islamic State isn't even a warlord. Warlords have the ability 'to attract' individuals without loyalties to simply be on the winning side and be alive. The Islamic State only allows certain religious affiliations. The Islamic State discriminates it's participants, as a rule warlords don't, it is why young Muslim men were a part of a jihad movement in Afghanistan.
The Islamic State is based in a commercial enterprise with wealth assets and promises of a fantasized life. Basically, the Islamic State is promising virgins and abundance of them and the riches of living "islamic" as their incentive. They are bringing heaven into reality. There is no sacrifice needed to be a member of the Islamic State. Participants come and go from the Islamic State as they please. It is club that practices genocide.
December 20, 2014By Haaertz
A Texas plumber (click here) whose truck was photographed serving as a jihadist anti-aircraft gun platform in Syria says he has no idea how it ended up thousands of kilometers away in the war-torn country, according to a report by CBS News....
...Oberholtzer said he had traded in the truck to second-hand dealership three years previously. He left the decal on the truck in the expectation that the dealership would remove it.
A spokesman for the dealer said that they had passed it on to a car auction house, Oberholtzer has been besieged by phone calls — some threatening — since the picture was posted. “A few of the people are really ugly,” he told The Galveston Daily News.
Later in the week, federal Homeland Security officials arrived at Mark-1 Plumbing to question Oberholtzer and his staff.
The Islamic State is the one sincere reason and example of why the different religious nations in the Middle East need to find peace between them. If the countries are divided among each other it is far easier for the Islamic State to find favor among them and spread their poison.
The moral to the story is don't sell anything with identifying marks. When one stops to realize the extent this could cause problems for individuals in the USA or elsewhere, removing the identification of the business should have occurred with the initial owner.
The pick-up at some point left the USA. Why? Who?
This concept that the USA military wants to say this is a group unlike any others isn't really that new. The only reason it stands out is because of it's ability to kill and take land away from sovereign authorities. There have been young Muslim men from around the world conducting jihad for a long time. They enter Pakistan and move toward any uprising in the area.
I don't like to just refer to Mr. Walker Lindh over and over, but, most folks know this episode in his life. It is how John Walker Lindh found himself in the conflict in Afghanistan. He didn't go there to fight the USA, he went there to fight jihad (the moral war). The Islamic State is based in that same ideology. They simply have been more successful because of the Ba'athists and their military knowledge.
I might add that religious grounds are not recognized as permission to commit treason. The First Amendment allows for practice of religion INSIDE the sovereign borders of the USA, it has no validity otherwise. The exception would be USA miltiary soldiers stationed abroad, but, even that would be limited to the base and/or ship belong to the USA. So, men or women seeking the life of a jihadist is romanticizing their ideology to the extreme of becoming an enemy of the USA.
Americans can go on non-violent pilgrimages. That isn't even in question, get a passport and go to find new and interesting aspects of one's religion, but, picking up a weapon and entering battle is an entirely different decision by any individual.
I'll tell you want I think is lacking with these circumstances regarding the Muslim faith and jihad, is clear language crafted in a law to deny any American from leaving in practice of his or her faith to be a part of jihad abroad. I would go so far as to state this religious practice is recognition of any individual engaging in such practice or support as enemies of the USA. In that is the reality the USA will add their names to "Most Wanted." To do otherwise, even in Great Britain, is ridiculous.
The USA has allies in the Middle East and Far East, so to allow such activity is to carry sovereign authority to war with allies. How can a sovereign authority give permission in any sense to allow holy men or women to recruit Americans, Australians or the English to fight in a foreign land. A measure this strong has to spell out clearly the consequences of their actions abroad and to that end enforced. The Mosques have to be notified that while their practice of the faith is unencumbered in the USA, the USA ends that freedom with recruitment of a fighting force abroad.
I really do believe any internet access to young minds and hearts in the USA that seek recruitment is as illegal as participating in the war. The access should be denied. The internet access of jihadist extremists compromises the Mosques and their protection of the faithful. It is an open venue to invite the Mosques into participation and condoning the exercise of fitting jihad.
I once ran across a page in a US Government website that stated, "If you go past this page it is considered a felony of the USA." Seriously. I don't know how I did that, but, with such a page I automatically decided I didn't need any information that bad. If I can be successfully censored by the authority of the sovereign USA then so can everyone else.
