The Global Community needs to present FACTS and POLICY and the history of SUCCESS of those policies. Not rhetoric, standard mind speak or diplospeak. Facts. And how the USA holds responsibility for the war it creates and the suffering it causes. A legal record of USA misdirection of a global and sustainable peace. The USA history of such atrocities are known to it's people and the world. It is time the historical record be replaced without hubris to power.
Don't forget traditional allies that stand outside the act of war. If a case for abuse of power it to be made there is room for all nations, not just those traditionally opposed. White Phosphorus actually kills less than the climate. Passive or active accountability is in order. The USA military has long cited climate as a driver to destabilizing governments, yet, the USA government did nothing but hold in place it's superpower status. It's all there. The suffering the USA causes is historic. The global economic collapse was not a mistake, it was a strategy.
And the self-righteous Powers should actually be in attendance to come to an understanding of how reduction of casualties and peace actually happens.
The US information is faulty and one sided. The media is pounding away at permission for war and reasons to cause a greater harm all in the name of a humanitarian ideology that has been their dialogue repeatedly.
The American Media has caused more deaths in the world than it ever would consider having been the impetus and this is yet another case.
Additionally, the Executive Branch of the USA was not engaged in a meaningful way with the United Nations at important junctures of dialogue. The United Nations was treated as a misguided toy rather than an international body.
If Syria carried out the chemical attacks as Secretary Kerry stated he did, then the chemical weapons are still secure and it would be best for Assad to stop hiding the truth. Syria has had the right for these weapons through international recognition and he is engaged in a civil war. When Saddam carried out atrocities in Iraq there was no war, but, only killing for the sake of ethnic cleansing. There is a difference.
If the chemical weapons are still secure as the USA is confessing, then the regional security is not threatened.
There is no guarantee that a disarming of Syria would result in better regional security, as a matter of fact there is every reason to believe otherwise. When the American Media ranted and raved about Egypt and Mubarak, the political pressure in the USA forced Obama to take on the cause of a force unknown with the idea the people of Egypt would be safe among themselves. They were not.
When Assad falls and this so called recognized USA authority steps into the light it will give MORE CAUSE and not less for increased USA involvement as the American media will sight attacks and violence by al Qaeda with the threat of securing the chemical weapon plant from any unstable US authority.
Remember this began with a civil war, the states of Abkhazia and Osettia were attacked and noted by peacekeepers. Yet, they are not recognized and instead seeking a greater advantage over Russia, the USA insists Georgia be made whole.
There are many double standards in the USA military strategy against sovereign nations without proper reverence for the one standing global superpower. It is those double standards that cannot be ignored.
The attacks on Syria is a "War of Choice" no different than that of Iraq. It would seem President Obama doesn't enjoy frustration with global peace initiatives and "By damn it, if they won't commit to peace, then we will create the atmosphere that will." That is not a man resolved to peace, but, of tirade.
Don't forget traditional allies that stand outside the act of war. If a case for abuse of power it to be made there is room for all nations, not just those traditionally opposed. White Phosphorus actually kills less than the climate. Passive or active accountability is in order. The USA military has long cited climate as a driver to destabilizing governments, yet, the USA government did nothing but hold in place it's superpower status. It's all there. The suffering the USA causes is historic. The global economic collapse was not a mistake, it was a strategy.
And the self-righteous Powers should actually be in attendance to come to an understanding of how reduction of casualties and peace actually happens.
The US information is faulty and one sided. The media is pounding away at permission for war and reasons to cause a greater harm all in the name of a humanitarian ideology that has been their dialogue repeatedly.
The American Media has caused more deaths in the world than it ever would consider having been the impetus and this is yet another case.
Additionally, the Executive Branch of the USA was not engaged in a meaningful way with the United Nations at important junctures of dialogue. The United Nations was treated as a misguided toy rather than an international body.
If Syria carried out the chemical attacks as Secretary Kerry stated he did, then the chemical weapons are still secure and it would be best for Assad to stop hiding the truth. Syria has had the right for these weapons through international recognition and he is engaged in a civil war. When Saddam carried out atrocities in Iraq there was no war, but, only killing for the sake of ethnic cleansing. There is a difference.
If the chemical weapons are still secure as the USA is confessing, then the regional security is not threatened.
There is no guarantee that a disarming of Syria would result in better regional security, as a matter of fact there is every reason to believe otherwise. When the American Media ranted and raved about Egypt and Mubarak, the political pressure in the USA forced Obama to take on the cause of a force unknown with the idea the people of Egypt would be safe among themselves. They were not.
When Assad falls and this so called recognized USA authority steps into the light it will give MORE CAUSE and not less for increased USA involvement as the American media will sight attacks and violence by al Qaeda with the threat of securing the chemical weapon plant from any unstable US authority.
Remember this began with a civil war, the states of Abkhazia and Osettia were attacked and noted by peacekeepers. Yet, they are not recognized and instead seeking a greater advantage over Russia, the USA insists Georgia be made whole.
There are many double standards in the USA military strategy against sovereign nations without proper reverence for the one standing global superpower. It is those double standards that cannot be ignored.
The attacks on Syria is a "War of Choice" no different than that of Iraq. It would seem President Obama doesn't enjoy frustration with global peace initiatives and "By damn it, if they won't commit to peace, then we will create the atmosphere that will." That is not a man resolved to peace, but, of tirade.
