Does everyone understand what 'demoralize' means? It means it takes the definition of the political discourse and uses 'authority statements' to achieve a change in that dialogue. Demoralizing a nation's dialogue about its circumstances only 'kicks the can down the road.'
Mr. Romney was stuck on his rhetoric and his wrongful economic values and simply continued them with his wealthy supports. I sincerely think he is going to start up his own Bain Group with a political intent. He may or may not change his 'end product' to reflect a kinder economic outcome to the Middle Class, but, the methodology will never change. He can't change it. It is a proven method which results in high income to its initial investors. Romney's past performance is example of that. His past performance proves he is a vulture capitalist and NOT a venture capitalist. As much as the Texas Governor Rick Perry was ridiculed in his dialogue about Mr. Romney, he was correct. Rick Perry leads projects with investors all the time in Texas. Whether one consents to those projects or not is not what this is about. Perry knows when an investment is about building a future or destroying it for the purpose of monetary exploitation. He is inarticulate about his knowledge, but, he was correct. Romney never built anything that didn't hurt the long term economic outcome of Americans.
Examples: The steel plant was drained of its value and those monies went directly into the pockets of investors that facilitated the purchase of the steel plant in the first place. Staples, Sports Authority were created out of remnants of American manufacturing. All the suppliers that went out of business to the sports marketing storefronts, the office marketing storefronts were replaced with cheaper alternatives from import sources. Then the store fronts were staffed with cheap labor. Big Box stores are known destroyers of the American economic 'strength.'
We know for a fact, subsistence economic status of any American does not lead to growth. The larger the numbers of 'subsistence Americans' the less economic growth will occur. Why? Because Subsistence Americans purchase specific items with their income. They do not expand their purchases of new technology unless it extends the limited dollars available to them.
A country will always have some degree of poverty because there is a populous of people unable (that was unable) to improve their circumstances, but, if that poverty grows an economic tragedy will occur and the economy will contract. It is why Wall Street consents and rewards the idea of an American having two, three or four jobs. No benefits, part time income from some jobs, but at least it expands the 'disposable' income to purchase their products / trends / gimmicks / faux economic values, etc. Call it what you want but Romney's Wall Street values is not about quality of life, it is about putting 'some money' into the hands of those that can provide profits to companies.
The United States of America is demoralized of its Middle Class values. The destruction of the American Dream was the last frontier. The Bubble and Bust economy of the Republicans is the problem.
The future is about rebuilding sustainable jobs through new technology and returning benevolent values to the outcomes of our economy. Part of a sustainable economy is about returning 'moral content' to the goals of the people and not simply 'an income.' Moral content means people are hired into or builds an enterprise that will sustain the values of the society.
The younger generations are correct in their values for what they want for their country. They have the most invested in the longevity of the economic outcome of the USA. They were born into the imploding economic strategies, witnessed its disastrous outcomes and knows, almost through instinct, what is best and what is not. The impoverishment of the youngest employable generation in the USA knows what happened to them and why. In the majority, their values are trustworthy to their own outcomes.
