Alabama’s chief justice (click here) issued an order on Wednesday to keep the state’s
same-sex marriage ban intact despite the Supreme Court's landmark
ruling last year....
What Roy Moore is doing is challenging the rule of law. His actions can even be thought of as treason. The rule of law is important because it is the basis of our USA Constitution's result. The rule of law is the brevity of decisions by anyone living under the law.
The rule of law is a principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.
The Establishment of Judicial Review (click here)
Judicial review is one of the distinctive features of United States constitutional law. It is no small wonder, then, to find that the power of the federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions by the standards of what the Constitution grants and withholds is nowhere expressly conveyed. But it is hardly noteworthy that its legitimacy has been challenged from the first, and, while now accepted generally, it still has detractors and its supporters disagree about its doctrinal basis and its application. Although it was first asserted in Marbury v. Madison to strike down an act of Congress as inconsistent with the Constitution, judicial review did not spring full-blown from the brain of Chief Justice Marshall. The concept had been long known, having been utilized in a much more limited form by Privy Council review of colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters, and there were several instances known to the Framers of state court invalidation of state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions....
When are these people that practice politics and not law going to be charged and arrested?
There are standards written regarding bad behavior, too.
Article III
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office....
Judicial Review is a majority of the activities of the thrid branch of government. Judge Roy Moore needs to be removed from his judicial rights and brought before a court willing to hear it. The chance of charging Moore in Alabama is slim to never. But, federal agents can charge and arrest Judge Moore. He has spent his judical years in activism. It is obvious he cannot discern his church loyalty from that of his job. He isn't fit to judge anything.
A judge cannot place his religion into consideration before the responsibility assigned by the US Constitution. The US Constitution demands loyalty to the principle within it. Substituting religious ideology for the US Constitution is treason.
What Roy Moore is doing is challenging the rule of law. His actions can even be thought of as treason. The rule of law is important because it is the basis of our USA Constitution's result. The rule of law is the brevity of decisions by anyone living under the law.
The rule of law is a principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law.
The Establishment of Judicial Review (click here)
Judicial review is one of the distinctive features of United States constitutional law. It is no small wonder, then, to find that the power of the federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions by the standards of what the Constitution grants and withholds is nowhere expressly conveyed. But it is hardly noteworthy that its legitimacy has been challenged from the first, and, while now accepted generally, it still has detractors and its supporters disagree about its doctrinal basis and its application. Although it was first asserted in Marbury v. Madison to strike down an act of Congress as inconsistent with the Constitution, judicial review did not spring full-blown from the brain of Chief Justice Marshall. The concept had been long known, having been utilized in a much more limited form by Privy Council review of colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters, and there were several instances known to the Framers of state court invalidation of state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions....
When are these people that practice politics and not law going to be charged and arrested?
There are standards written regarding bad behavior, too.
Article III
Section 1.
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office....
Judicial Review is a majority of the activities of the thrid branch of government. Judge Roy Moore needs to be removed from his judicial rights and brought before a court willing to hear it. The chance of charging Moore in Alabama is slim to never. But, federal agents can charge and arrest Judge Moore. He has spent his judical years in activism. It is obvious he cannot discern his church loyalty from that of his job. He isn't fit to judge anything.
A judge cannot place his religion into consideration before the responsibility assigned by the US Constitution. The US Constitution demands loyalty to the principle within it. Substituting religious ideology for the US Constitution is treason.
The Establishment of Judicial Review
Judicial review is one of the distinctive features of United States constitutional law. It is no small wonder, then, to find that the power of the federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions by the standards of what the Constitution grants and withholds is nowhere expressly conveyed. But it is hardly noteworthy that its legitimacy has been challenged from the first, and, while now accepted generally, it still has detractors and its supporters disagree about its doctrinal basis and its application. 576 Although it was first asserted in Marbury v. Madison 577 to strike down an act of Congress as inconsistent with the Constitution, judicial review did not spring full-blown from the brain of Chief Justice Marshall. The concept had been long known, having been utilized in a much more limited form by Privy Council review of colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters, 578 and there were several instances known to the Framers of state court invalidation of state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions.
- See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/article3/annotation13.html#sthash.VHsLS0LN.dpuf
Judicial review is one of the distinctive features of United States constitutional law. It is no small wonder, then, to find that the power of the federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions by the standards of what the Constitution grants and withholds is nowhere expressly conveyed. But it is hardly noteworthy that its legitimacy has been challenged from the first, and, while now accepted generally, it still has detractors and its supporters disagree about its doctrinal basis and its application. 576 Although it was first asserted in Marbury v. Madison 577 to strike down an act of Congress as inconsistent with the Constitution, judicial review did not spring full-blown from the brain of Chief Justice Marshall. The concept had been long known, having been utilized in a much more limited form by Privy Council review of colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters, 578 and there were several instances known to the Framers of state court invalidation of state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions.
- See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/article3/annotation13.html#sthash.VHsLS0LN.dpuf
