Who is the DNC vendor?
This is not an issue for either of the campaigns, the failure of the site was the of a vendor of the DNC and the responsibility ends there.
The information that was suppose to be protected has to be restored, however, there should not be any punitive measures against the campaigns.
The hostility toward the Sanders' campaign is outrageous.
Schultz should be fired!!
I don't buy into the crowning thing. I don't believe the Clinton campaign expects special treatment.
The FACTS are becoming clearer. The DNC vendor is responsible for a so-called glitch. The DNC should be apologizing to both campaigns. The Sanders' campaign has a lot of young talent that is playing a part in a major campaign for the first time. This should be a sincere exercise in morality and appropriate measures of outrage. If the Sanders' campaign realized they were looking at an open assess that was suppose to be separate, that means the Sanders' campaign was compromised as well. But, for the entire campaign of Senator Sanders to be compromised in it's ability to move forward is completely negligent of the DNC. It appears as though the way Schultz regards the Sanders' campaign as disposable to the outcome of the Democratic nomination.
I expect and demand Schultz return the Sanders' campaign to full status.
The information that was suppose to be protected has to be restored, however, there should not be any punitive measures against the campaigns.
The hostility toward the Sanders' campaign is outrageous.
Schultz should be fired!!
I don't buy into the crowning thing. I don't believe the Clinton campaign expects special treatment.
The FACTS are becoming clearer. The DNC vendor is responsible for a so-called glitch. The DNC should be apologizing to both campaigns. The Sanders' campaign has a lot of young talent that is playing a part in a major campaign for the first time. This should be a sincere exercise in morality and appropriate measures of outrage. If the Sanders' campaign realized they were looking at an open assess that was suppose to be separate, that means the Sanders' campaign was compromised as well. But, for the entire campaign of Senator Sanders to be compromised in it's ability to move forward is completely negligent of the DNC. It appears as though the way Schultz regards the Sanders' campaign as disposable to the outcome of the Democratic nomination.
I expect and demand Schultz return the Sanders' campaign to full status.
It's increasingly clear that Debbie Wasserman Schultz, (click here) Chair of the Democratic National Committee, isn't acting as a neutral party Chair, trying to insure a fair and democratic primary and building the Democratic Party in the states.
Rather, she's acting as a shill for Hillary Clinton, doing everything in her power to ensure that no one will effectively challenge Hillary's coronation as the nominee.
Wasserman Schultz is committing political malpractice and should be removed.
Remember that Wasserman Schultz was National Co-Chair of Hillary's 2008 Presidential campaign against Barack Obama and has been a loyal Clinonista. Her actions throughout the campaign have made it clear that she's misusing her position as party chair to serve as a campaign operative for Clinton and not a representative of the entire party....
