A child born to an American father inside the USA can be left behind to be raised as an American in a Wahhabism strictness and rise to be President. Then the USA military enters into the holy war that will succeed.
The fact the mother and father are now dead, the baby falls into a sphere of uncertainty to his rise to power in the USA. The parents didn't bargain for the fact child protective services would enter the picture. The baby's family has a history now. The mother was from Saudi Arabia and perhaps the baby can be placed with relatives there, but, not likely as the child has a USA birth certificate. But, to place the child with the family in the USA raises the fact the baby was in danger in a garage that was a black hole to everyone's knowledge. It is something to worry about.
I sincerely think the parents were leaving the child with their grandmother as a babysitter and expected to be home when they had finished their revenge on a public employer for disciplining Daddy.
If Daddy is discredited, what does that do to baby? It is exclusively a dilemma for the USA because the Arab nations in the Middle East are primarily lead by Kings or dictators. That single line of ascending to power insures the country and it's people will fall into the hands of a capable leader.
The violence is justified for the killers because they are assuming political power without the title of power. People have to learn a lesson for the insults of working in the USA against a man's reputation. Those disciplinary papers have to stop.
Happy Holidays. What is better than to hit Americans right between the eyes with violence during a month long holiday season that begins with Thanksgiving. Muslims are very familiar with month long holidays and what transpires during that time.
One other thing. Last night Rachel Maddow had a couple of lawyers talking about the MYTHS created in the USA about gun control and these incidents are orchestrated by the government to control power and take away defense. That is very low information voter talk. It is my opinion those lawyers were talking to a community of people to raise money.
The audience could be inside or outside the USA or both. People do read subtitles and the lawyer talking in English proves they are in The West and are reputable to their statements.
The fact the mother and father are now dead, the baby falls into a sphere of uncertainty to his rise to power in the USA. The parents didn't bargain for the fact child protective services would enter the picture. The baby's family has a history now. The mother was from Saudi Arabia and perhaps the baby can be placed with relatives there, but, not likely as the child has a USA birth certificate. But, to place the child with the family in the USA raises the fact the baby was in danger in a garage that was a black hole to everyone's knowledge. It is something to worry about.
I sincerely think the parents were leaving the child with their grandmother as a babysitter and expected to be home when they had finished their revenge on a public employer for disciplining Daddy.
If Daddy is discredited, what does that do to baby? It is exclusively a dilemma for the USA because the Arab nations in the Middle East are primarily lead by Kings or dictators. That single line of ascending to power insures the country and it's people will fall into the hands of a capable leader.
The violence is justified for the killers because they are assuming political power without the title of power. People have to learn a lesson for the insults of working in the USA against a man's reputation. Those disciplinary papers have to stop.
Happy Holidays. What is better than to hit Americans right between the eyes with violence during a month long holiday season that begins with Thanksgiving. Muslims are very familiar with month long holidays and what transpires during that time.
One other thing. Last night Rachel Maddow had a couple of lawyers talking about the MYTHS created in the USA about gun control and these incidents are orchestrated by the government to control power and take away defense. That is very low information voter talk. It is my opinion those lawyers were talking to a community of people to raise money.
The audience could be inside or outside the USA or both. People do read subtitles and the lawyer talking in English proves they are in The West and are reputable to their statements.
