This DOES NOT NEED NUCLEAR MATERIAL TO WORK.
It would be insane to use nuclear material for such a methodolgy.
JERKS !!!!!
It is "W"rong for the media to imply a 'nuclear option' would be the result of such a method. FEAR. The Americna Media will do anything to instill FEAR into the electorate when it comes to DEMOCRATS AND THEIR 'INNOVATION.'
The TRUTH is that this tragedy may never end. That is the truth with a human induced oil seep one mile below sea level.
That reality dictates a vastly different course of action as the actions of BP now endangers the entire health of the global oceans.
The sea bed surrounding the "exporatory" drill has to be displaced. In order for this procedure to work the explosives have to be set at an odd number of places and not equi-distant. The charges have to be placed at different depths within the rock and have varying levels of explosive capacity.
THE ROCK where the explosives are placed has to accounted for in calculating the amount of explosive material needed.
The more 'tight' the molecular structure of the rock the better, but, when the fisile nature of the rock increases, the more explosive material that is necessary.
Why? That should be fairly obvious. The explosion will be absorbed by very fisile rock while the 'energy' from the explosion will be more distributed and be able to 'act on' the concrete and steel within in the densest molecular structure.
The USA military uses explosives all the time, including bullets in guns and cannons. They should already have information within their 'knowledge base' of what it takes to 'act on' concrete and steel. They can work with USGS to determine the layers of 'sea bed' that would be best to accommodate the explosives to 'close the space' at the interior of this drill hole.
There is too much methane coming through the drill hole for any conventional methods to work as well as its location one mile down.
SERIOUSLY !!!!!!
Give me a minute.
To begin with the entire coast of Louisiana and the off shore geological content is well known to the USA military.
There has been a lot of money spent on those wetlands by the people of the USA to protect fisheries, etc.
The point is the geology of this region is well known and the seismic activity of the offshore areas is required to be well known in order to drill at all.
This region has to take top priority in national security and any and all available resources need to be dedicated to it.
Now while BP states there is no way this can be handled differently, I have a very difficult time believing that. The 'strata' of geological layers in this picture does not illustrate the current status of the well in the Gulf.
The drill casing is made out of steel. There is usually cement poured around it to reinforce the drill hole. BUT, the center of this 'structural hole' is empty. It is hollow. It is highly vulnerable to collapse. All that has to occur is a blast strong enough to displace the geological structure surrounding this 'hole' and the cement that reinforces the VOID of structure ENOUGH to collapse it.
What does that mean? Easy.
At places in the geological layers of strata surrounding the well there needs to be drilled, NO DIFFERENT THAN THE WELLS DRILLED PARALLEL TO ABANDONED OIL WELLS THAT CHILDREN FALL INTO, holes to have placed in them highly explosive devices to be ignited to displace the concrete, steel and strata at the place of the well.
There is no reason to believe this hole is going to get any bigger than it is. The 'induced seismic' action will dislocate the concrete, steel and surrounding layers of Earth under high PSI at one mile down and cause a collapse of the 'space' that the oil and methane gas are escaping from. There are no ADJOINING cavities to the well to allow any methane to escape into the holes were explosive devices are placed. And to insure the explosion don't move UPWARD rather than OUTWARD, the top of the drill holes with the explosive devices has to be sealed with the geological earth that has been removed to create them. The PSI of the sea water and the movement of the earth itself will take care of this mess once and for all.
The DRILLED HOLES (at least four if not six or eight) have to go deep 'enough' to place the explosives and NOT, definately NOT, near the vat of oil currently ruptured by BP. Basically, 'shake' the hole to implosion. It is a highly viable SOLUTION to the problem. The explosions have to be strong enough to displace the geological rock horizontally.
As the Nation's largest (click title to entry - thank you) earth-science and civilian mapping agency, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) works in cooperation with many Federal, State, and local organizations to provide reliable and impartial scientific information to resource managers, planners, and others throughout the country. This information is gathered in every state by USGS scientists to minimize the loss of life and property from natural disasters, contribute to the conservation and sound management of the Nation's natural resources, and enhance the quality of life by monitoring water, biological, energy, and mineral resources. This Fact Sheet describes some of the USGS activities in Louisiana.
Louisiana has 25 percent of the forested wetlands and 40 percent of the coastal wetlands in the 48 contiguous States but accounts for 80 percent of wetlands losses....
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-019-99/
It would be insane to use nuclear material for such a methodolgy.
JERKS !!!!!
It is "W"rong for the media to imply a 'nuclear option' would be the result of such a method. FEAR. The Americna Media will do anything to instill FEAR into the electorate when it comes to DEMOCRATS AND THEIR 'INNOVATION.'
The TRUTH is that this tragedy may never end. That is the truth with a human induced oil seep one mile below sea level.
That reality dictates a vastly different course of action as the actions of BP now endangers the entire health of the global oceans.
The sea bed surrounding the "exporatory" drill has to be displaced. In order for this procedure to work the explosives have to be set at an odd number of places and not equi-distant. The charges have to be placed at different depths within the rock and have varying levels of explosive capacity.
THE ROCK where the explosives are placed has to accounted for in calculating the amount of explosive material needed.
The more 'tight' the molecular structure of the rock the better, but, when the fisile nature of the rock increases, the more explosive material that is necessary.
Why? That should be fairly obvious. The explosion will be absorbed by very fisile rock while the 'energy' from the explosion will be more distributed and be able to 'act on' the concrete and steel within in the densest molecular structure.
The USA military uses explosives all the time, including bullets in guns and cannons. They should already have information within their 'knowledge base' of what it takes to 'act on' concrete and steel. They can work with USGS to determine the layers of 'sea bed' that would be best to accommodate the explosives to 'close the space' at the interior of this drill hole.
There is too much methane coming through the drill hole for any conventional methods to work as well as its location one mile down.
SERIOUSLY !!!!!!
Give me a minute.
To begin with the entire coast of Louisiana and the off shore geological content is well known to the USA military.
There has been a lot of money spent on those wetlands by the people of the USA to protect fisheries, etc.
The point is the geology of this region is well known and the seismic activity of the offshore areas is required to be well known in order to drill at all.
This region has to take top priority in national security and any and all available resources need to be dedicated to it.
Now while BP states there is no way this can be handled differently, I have a very difficult time believing that. The 'strata' of geological layers in this picture does not illustrate the current status of the well in the Gulf.
The drill casing is made out of steel. There is usually cement poured around it to reinforce the drill hole. BUT, the center of this 'structural hole' is empty. It is hollow. It is highly vulnerable to collapse. All that has to occur is a blast strong enough to displace the geological structure surrounding this 'hole' and the cement that reinforces the VOID of structure ENOUGH to collapse it.
What does that mean? Easy.
At places in the geological layers of strata surrounding the well there needs to be drilled, NO DIFFERENT THAN THE WELLS DRILLED PARALLEL TO ABANDONED OIL WELLS THAT CHILDREN FALL INTO, holes to have placed in them highly explosive devices to be ignited to displace the concrete, steel and strata at the place of the well.
There is no reason to believe this hole is going to get any bigger than it is. The 'induced seismic' action will dislocate the concrete, steel and surrounding layers of Earth under high PSI at one mile down and cause a collapse of the 'space' that the oil and methane gas are escaping from. There are no ADJOINING cavities to the well to allow any methane to escape into the holes were explosive devices are placed. And to insure the explosion don't move UPWARD rather than OUTWARD, the top of the drill holes with the explosive devices has to be sealed with the geological earth that has been removed to create them. The PSI of the sea water and the movement of the earth itself will take care of this mess once and for all.
The DRILLED HOLES (at least four if not six or eight) have to go deep 'enough' to place the explosives and NOT, definately NOT, near the vat of oil currently ruptured by BP. Basically, 'shake' the hole to implosion. It is a highly viable SOLUTION to the problem. The explosions have to be strong enough to displace the geological rock horizontally.
As the Nation's largest (click title to entry - thank you) earth-science and civilian mapping agency, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) works in cooperation with many Federal, State, and local organizations to provide reliable and impartial scientific information to resource managers, planners, and others throughout the country. This information is gathered in every state by USGS scientists to minimize the loss of life and property from natural disasters, contribute to the conservation and sound management of the Nation's natural resources, and enhance the quality of life by monitoring water, biological, energy, and mineral resources. This Fact Sheet describes some of the USGS activities in Louisiana.
Atchafalaya Basin Management
The Atchafalaya Basin (fig. 1) in south-central Louisiana is the largest river-bottomland hardwood swamp in the Nation. The USGS, in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), is monitoring the basin to determine environmental effects of flood-management practices. Physical and chemical-related properties being monitored include continuous velocity and stage, specific conductance, pH, dissolved-oxygen (DO) concentrations, water temperature, and sediment deposition....
Louisiana has 25 percent of the forested wetlands and 40 percent of the coastal wetlands in the 48 contiguous States but accounts for 80 percent of wetlands losses....
http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-019-99/
