Saturday, January 23, 2021

Deal or No Deal?

The Michigan Attorney General needs to ask for evidence  still in the public sector that clearly spells out Snyder's malicious intent to favor cronies and a draconian practice that drained cities of their assets to satisfy his idea of MONETARY JUSTICE.

The facts are very simple. He didn't care about the people but only the balance sheet and if poisoning people to achieve a balance sheet him approved then so be it.

The Attorney General needs a liaison between herself and the people of Flint to decide deal or no deal. She also needs to have a call for evidence that is published in all 50 states because people effected by the poisoned water have moved away,

January 19,2020

...Investigators reviewed thousands of documents, (click here) searched computers, iPads and phones to try to figure out a timeline. The question is: When did the governor know that there was an issue with Flint’s water? When did he realize it was a public health emergency.

“He testified under oath about a date when he says he learned or knew, or became aware, of a problem. Now the investigators are going to look at other evidence that shows that governor Snyder apparently wasn’t telling the truth,” said legal analyst Neal Rockind.

Tuesday’s hearing is to decide whether the case moves to trial or if a deal can be made. There are eight other former Michigan state leaders charged in the case....