48 percent. Those folks are subsistence workers and the only growth they provide to the USA economy is the birth of children so their children can become subsistence workers.
What I fail to understand is why the unions are taking this lying down. They should be screaming at the top of their lungs they are being eliminated from the face of the USA. The union culture has brought American workers safe working conditions and we can go from there in relation to benefits and good pay.
Unions work under a contract. Since when do legislators carry out initiatives that destroy contracts?
What about this do union organizers not understand? This is a culture that directly benefits the vitality of Wall Street.
The history to destroying unions begins with Reagan, but, at the time the country never viewed it that way. Americans wanted their jets taking off and landing. That is all they knew. They never knew the companies were sitting on their hands for months before the contract expired. As the end of the contract drew near the unions should have been handing out pamphlets at airports or from picket lines stating the facts.
I would like to see unions spelling out in their contracts the benefits the union brings to the people they represent and how it is only right those that voted in MAJORITY for the union has the right to collect fees from others that do not sign up for memberships.
Every union contract should reflect the need for non-members to participate in costs of the union when they directly benefit from the union activities that brought the contract.
One other thing. If union contracts can be legislated so unions lose their ability to protect American workers and their incomes what does that do to other contracts?
The wording in contracts from here forward have to include the adverse effect "Right to Work" has on unions and the people that BENEFIT directly from the contracts of those unions. INCLUDING safe work environments.
Are unions important to minorities?
Is Right to Work laws actually racism?
Where are the impoverished when it comes to the ability to experience upward movement in the USA economy which is their birth right?
I believe given the demographics of poverty, Right to Work is a racist agenda.
What I fail to understand is why the unions are taking this lying down. They should be screaming at the top of their lungs they are being eliminated from the face of the USA. The union culture has brought American workers safe working conditions and we can go from there in relation to benefits and good pay.
Unions work under a contract. Since when do legislators carry out initiatives that destroy contracts?
What about this do union organizers not understand? This is a culture that directly benefits the vitality of Wall Street.
The history to destroying unions begins with Reagan, but, at the time the country never viewed it that way. Americans wanted their jets taking off and landing. That is all they knew. They never knew the companies were sitting on their hands for months before the contract expired. As the end of the contract drew near the unions should have been handing out pamphlets at airports or from picket lines stating the facts.
I would like to see unions spelling out in their contracts the benefits the union brings to the people they represent and how it is only right those that voted in MAJORITY for the union has the right to collect fees from others that do not sign up for memberships.
Every union contract should reflect the need for non-members to participate in costs of the union when they directly benefit from the union activities that brought the contract.
One other thing. If union contracts can be legislated so unions lose their ability to protect American workers and their incomes what does that do to other contracts?
The wording in contracts from here forward have to include the adverse effect "Right to Work" has on unions and the people that BENEFIT directly from the contracts of those unions. INCLUDING safe work environments.
Are unions important to minorities?
Is Right to Work laws actually racism?
Where are the impoverished when it comes to the ability to experience upward movement in the USA economy which is their birth right?
I believe given the demographics of poverty, Right to Work is a racist agenda.
