Now, my beliefs about him has been validated. I appreciate it.
Hayden can put away his smile, it won't work anymore. The Bush White House never was and still is not trustworthy. Just that simple.
Matzzie, whose Twitter feed (click here) describes him as the founder of Ethical Electric Company, regaled followers with a string of tweets describing Hayden's comments to reporters. Hayden was also director of the CIA for three years.
"Former NSA spy boss Michael Hayden on Acela behind me blabbing 'on background as a former senior admin official,' sounds defensive," tweeted Matzzie. "Michael Hayden on Acela giving reporters disparaging quotes about admin. 'Remember, just refer as former senior admin.'"
And a few minutes later: "Hayden was bragging about rendition and black sites a minute ago."
Under the CIA's controversial rendition program after the September 11 attacks, terrorism suspects would be captured and held at undisclosed locations or "black sites" outside the United States....
You wonder why Murdoch's media machine is so successful with it's propaganda. Well, here is one of the prime examples. The Bush White House is more then willing to lie and manipulate the public to turn their future ambitions into reality.
Black sites and rendition should never be an agenda item, but, Murdoch will strive to prove how wonderfully safe the USA is due to kidnapping innocent Canadians to remote locations and interrogate under the worst conditions the world has to offer. They are disgusting.
The media needs to hurry and rehab Hayden's image. Hurry, hurry before the truth is realized by the country.
A brain trust is suppose to be something the people can actually trust with laws and ethics respected and upheld by the professions. A brain trust isn't suppose to turn on the very people it's suppose to serve. It is a matter of sovereignty. The Public Trust. These trusts are NOT found in banks, they are found in the belief the truth and integrity is actually important.
Mr. Matzzie has more integrity and trustworthiness than Hayden could ever hope to realize.
The American people aren't the only ones tired of the nastiness of the Murdoch media circus.
By Andy Fixmer - Oct 19, 2013 12:00 AM ET
...With the vote, (click here) investors are keeping up the pressure to split the roles of chairman and chief executive officer, both held by Murdoch. The tally suggests Fox will continue to face calls for reform. Murdoch son Lachlan wouldn’t have been re-elected to the board without his father’s votes. Last year, unaffiliated investors voted 2-1 to split the jobs at News Corp., which was separated into two separate publishing and entertainment businesses in June...
...“The level of family control -- Mr. Murdoch owns 40 percent of voting shares -- and the dual-class share structure which denies voting rights to Class A shareholders, were engineered to keep power in the hands of Mr. Murdoch,” said Julie Tanner of Christian Brothers Investment Services. “While it is virtually impossible for a shareholder resolution to ‘pass,’ a high vote result should send a clear signal to the board that change is needed.”...
