A bloodless coup is a military maneuver to take over the power of a country. It commands the people and the country's assets. That doesn't sound familiar?
The American military has found a way to take on the people of the USA to demand use of their people as soldiers and the nation's assets to become 4.4% of the GDP and 20% of the national budget. There are now chronic wars and no one can see the end of it. That isn't a military coup? Really?
These statements in 'the real world' are nonsense. It is all mind speak and salesmanship.
The United States will not support all of the rebels in the Syrian civil war, and the U.S. will not become directly involved in the war, said U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry during an exclusive interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Thursday. Kerry said that the intervention proposed by the White House would prop up the moderate opposition and harm Basher al-Assad.
Right. The USA is going to be able discern what rebels it will support and not support from 30,000 feet up.
“This action has nothing to do with engaging directly in Syria’s civil war on one side or the other,” said Kerry. However, he also said that the U.S. wants Assad to step down and argued that an American response would “have a downstream impact on Assad’s military capacity.”
But, yet the USA will decide winners and losers. Sure.
Kerry made the case before Congress this week for taking punitive action against Assad’s regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians last month. President Obama is making a similar argument for intervention at the St. Petersburg G-20 summit, where he hopes to build international support....
This week John Kerry provided why the diplomatic mission of the USA isn't working. It is based in hysterical demands backed by military hardware. When a Secretary of State demands results of others at the end of a gun diplomacy is lost. Completely lost. Kerry is destroying the credibility of the USA to actually have a diplomatic outreach without the threat of war. What ever happened to John Kerry?
The American military has found a way to take on the people of the USA to demand use of their people as soldiers and the nation's assets to become 4.4% of the GDP and 20% of the national budget. There are now chronic wars and no one can see the end of it. That isn't a military coup? Really?
These statements in 'the real world' are nonsense. It is all mind speak and salesmanship.
The United States will not support all of the rebels in the Syrian civil war, and the U.S. will not become directly involved in the war, said U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry during an exclusive interview with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes Thursday. Kerry said that the intervention proposed by the White House would prop up the moderate opposition and harm Basher al-Assad.
Right. The USA is going to be able discern what rebels it will support and not support from 30,000 feet up.
“This action has nothing to do with engaging directly in Syria’s civil war on one side or the other,” said Kerry. However, he also said that the U.S. wants Assad to step down and argued that an American response would “have a downstream impact on Assad’s military capacity.”
But, yet the USA will decide winners and losers. Sure.
Kerry made the case before Congress this week for taking punitive action against Assad’s regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians last month. President Obama is making a similar argument for intervention at the St. Petersburg G-20 summit, where he hopes to build international support....
This week John Kerry provided why the diplomatic mission of the USA isn't working. It is based in hysterical demands backed by military hardware. When a Secretary of State demands results of others at the end of a gun diplomacy is lost. Completely lost. Kerry is destroying the credibility of the USA to actually have a diplomatic outreach without the threat of war. What ever happened to John Kerry?
