Army officers (click here) join anti-government protesters demanding President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s resignation in Sana’a on Monday.
Image Credit: AP
I believe there 'CAN BE' many mixed signals from the leaders of these nations at this time. I have no doubt the Arab League is seeking a strong tone with the circumstances in Libya both Pro and Con to find 'fellowship' with their people.
While the Arab League detests the action of Colonel Gaddafi, there is the issue of Western involvement in the Middle East which in recent history has lead to sincere tragedy and occupation forces. The bottom line is their citizens are sincerely scared. It is important all the leaders involved in the efforts to 'secure' the citizens from a rampaging terrorist named Gaddafi, the voices of reassurance in the way of 'updates' and 'limits to involvement' are important at this point. Very important. It will help Arab leadership to validate their words and initiatives with their own peole.
Global coalition must stick to peacekeeping and leave Libya's future to its people (click title to entry - thank you)
...The allied campaign has claimed major gains against the regime. The US has talked about the first stage of the coalition strikes under a UN Security Council remit being "successful." There's even talk of Qaddafi's command and control compound being hit in the bombing....
I believe much of this movement has been advanced through social media. In order for people to understand what is transpiring it may be the West and Arab nations need to speak to the people in the way they find information comfortable and best.
I strongly believe the forces at work in Libya have to inform Arabia of their purpose and initiatives all along the way. I am confident the Afghan experience has taught the USA the importance of communication and transparency.
Communication with authority is something these citizens do not understand or are used to, so this is a training ground for everyone.
If an Iranian Ayatollah bowed to communication over Twitter with his people I think everyone else can get the picture.
The sense of justice, community and inclusiveness is vital in these seemingly unstable times.
This is about non-violence. It is what the Middle East needs and evidently has longed for.
I believe there 'CAN BE' many mixed signals from the leaders of these nations at this time. I have no doubt the Arab League is seeking a strong tone with the circumstances in Libya both Pro and Con to find 'fellowship' with their people.
While the Arab League detests the action of Colonel Gaddafi, there is the issue of Western involvement in the Middle East which in recent history has lead to sincere tragedy and occupation forces. The bottom line is their citizens are sincerely scared. It is important all the leaders involved in the efforts to 'secure' the citizens from a rampaging terrorist named Gaddafi, the voices of reassurance in the way of 'updates' and 'limits to involvement' are important at this point. Very important. It will help Arab leadership to validate their words and initiatives with their own peole.
Global coalition must stick to peacekeeping and leave Libya's future to its people (click title to entry - thank you)
Editorial
Mar 21, 2011 21:59...The allied campaign has claimed major gains against the regime. The US has talked about the first stage of the coalition strikes under a UN Security Council remit being "successful." There's even talk of Qaddafi's command and control compound being hit in the bombing....
I believe much of this movement has been advanced through social media. In order for people to understand what is transpiring it may be the West and Arab nations need to speak to the people in the way they find information comfortable and best.
I strongly believe the forces at work in Libya have to inform Arabia of their purpose and initiatives all along the way. I am confident the Afghan experience has taught the USA the importance of communication and transparency.
Communication with authority is something these citizens do not understand or are used to, so this is a training ground for everyone.
If an Iranian Ayatollah bowed to communication over Twitter with his people I think everyone else can get the picture.
The sense of justice, community and inclusiveness is vital in these seemingly unstable times.
...His Majesty (click here) took part in rituals to marking the 43rd anniversary of the battle when Jordanian soldiers repelled an Israeli attack on the small town of Karameh in the Jordan Valley, whose name means “dignity”.
In the ensuing battle, several Jordanian soldiers lost their lives while the Israeli raid was repelled with heavy losses as the Jordanian Army launched a heavy artillery barrage against Israeli tanks.
During the ceremony yesterday, the King recited verses from the Holy Koran and laid a wreath at the memorial.
The King viewed the names and photos of martyrs, put on display....
I don't want to hear how men of peace, like the dedicated King Abdullah of Jordan, are ridiculed for their loyalities to their people. I simply believe they are good and decent people seeking to find a 'path of peace' for their people. I admire them for their dedication. In the case of the Jordan King he never relents for the best outcomes of Jordanians. I believe that. That will never change. The King has been a partner in peace for a long time and I would expect that to be respected by everyone seeking the same outcomes.
This is about non-violence. It is what the Middle East needs and evidently has longed for.
