This is a bipedal robot. It is a work of interesting design. It took funding, money, to create this robot. I am not saying the robot is a bad entity. That is not the point. But, if a corporation can remove the idea of 'human speech' to super impose it on a solid entity such as money, what is to say that can't be done elsewhere?
The Robert's Court literally stated that a 'legal entity' called a corporation has a 'form of speech' called money. Money is a legal issue of the USA Treasury, Federal Reserve.
The traditional definition of the Supreme Court to 'speech' has been interpreted as a human capacity. Art, film, protest, burning flags and speech itself is all a method of human expression. And there is a limit on that expression. One cannot walk into a theater and yell fire, okay?
What the Robert's Court did was to remove the 'human' aspect of speech and replaced it with 'legal tender' used in economic trade in the market place. That is incompetent. A corporation is a legal entity no different than money is. That does not mean is has automatic rights under the USA Constitution. The USA Constitution was written to protect people, not 'legal entities' such as paper money or its capacity.
In expressing my right to Freedom of Speech I can burn a dollar bill or many dollar bills in varying denominations. If that money is mine, I have a right to do that. Now, that the Robert's Court has made money a protected entity within the capacity of the USA Constitution can I go to jail in my protest of burning money because it has a legal right equal to mine?
The Robert's Court has opened Pandora's Box here and they don't even know it, nor do they care.
A Corporation is NOT born with rights under the USA Consitution. No one gives birth to a corporation. It is a legal instrument generated by people to gain rights under economic laws of the USA.
Let me put that again.
A CORPORATION IS A LEGAL INSTRUMENT GENERATED BY PEOPLE TO GAIN RIGHTS/ADVANTAGE UNDER ECONOMIC LAWS.
It has no rights equivalent to a citizen until this hideous decision stripping the AMERICAN CITIZEN of protections from the capacity of corporations within the market place for political gaming.
The recent decision of the Robert's Court is incompetent. It dehumanizes the American citizen and victimizes them reducing their capacity of Freedom of Speech to an economic commodity within the political environment of the American Social Fabric.
The Robert's Court has oppressed the rights of human citizens while elevating the rights of the 'legal tender/instruments' the people have invented to facilitate its economy.
The Robert's Court has oppressed the rights of human citizens in Freedom of Speech and Equal Rights because in order for equality to occur it has to be subsidized to facilitate the Freedom of Speech provided by the USA Constitution of its citizens.
The heinous oppression by The Robert's Court assaults Civil Rights and makes humans compete for Equality against its own governmental instruments. It removes the ability of its citizens to control their own legal instruments. Is that important? Is that dangerous? Yes. Because it 'favors' legal rights of legal instruments over the capacity of citizens to express themselves.
Money should not be awarded civil rights. And it gets more ludicrous when one realizes Gay Marriage isn't even recognized as an equality issue. I mean I don't know else it is. Either Gay Couples are human beings with the same rights as all citizens or they aren't?
The Robert's Court is dangerously incompetent and there needs to be a solution formulated.
The Robert's Court has even handicapped the rights of human citizens because they don't limit the capacity of corporations in the monetary amounts it can spend while there are limits on human speech. The decision is ridiculous and out of control to its corruption of our society.
They completely disregarded the very basis of the decision to protect citizen's equality rights in political capacity.
Public Funding of Presidential Elections (click here)
