Journalology, the New Science
Charles D. Johnson
Social Forces, Vol. 6, No. 3 (Mar., 1928), pp. 382-385
In my opinion, the profession needs to clearly define it's history that is recorded from about the 1920s-30s, it's mission and it's purpose. It needs clear parameters in promoting journalistic expertise in other nations allowing it's practice without providing for impetus to revolution. The profession needs to be seen by international agencies such as the United Nations and Amnesty International as an enhancement to their missions. Through advocacy and not insistance there can be a better and safer practice that promotes knowledge of a populous. One of the best success stories of a country that moved toward democratic reform is Brazil. It didnt' happen overnight but it did happen. Progressive education of qualified journalism schools in countries that long for higher practice of expertise working in conjuction with State Departments and Foreign ministries will prevent tragic loss of life and keep promising journalists at their typewriters rather than behind bars.
Journalism can 'enhance' the movement of a society toward better quality of life, but, it can't create a government by insistance. The knowledge people have to move a society forward will bring about change, not the inspiration of violence. In my opinion, profits as a support to the profession has caused a bit of crisis. It needs to be addressed. The USA does not need it's own 'media outlets,' it needs to support those in private 'status' insuring they continue to do it autonomously and well.
From here an exploration of journalism's history and how it can better define itself in autonomy of a profession rather than a popularity contest for profits.
Good night.
