…is not qualified to change the course of medical science. It is malpractice based in religious, political hubris. He needs to be reviewed for competency and ethic violations.
If he wants to preach he needs to do that in a different venue and not a courtroom. His spouse is known to use her children to campaign against abortion rights for women.
Yes, all this outrageous and rude behavior in the judiciary is based in ethical malfeasance empowered by political dogma. There is no constitutional basis for these issues including obstructing freedom of speech in a legislative body outraged by mass killings of Americans.
