Brett Kavanaugh plagiarized Donald John Trump in a recent opinion. He didn't plagiarize a speech at some radical right religious meeting, he plagiarized a Supreme Court opinion. That is called incompetency.
I don't think there is anything smart or especially politically leaning about plagiarism, it is just pure stupidity and brings into question the competency of Federalist Society judges.
October 27, 2020By Mark Joseph Stern
While the Senate confirmed Amy Coney Barrett on Monday night, (click here) Justice Brett Kavanaugh handed down a startling opinion that laid out how the Supreme Court could steal the election for Donald Trump. Kavanaugh’s opinion was an assault on the integrity of America’s upcoming election; it was also extraordinarily sloppy, riddled with errors that would make even a traffic court judge blush. It’s worth highlighting these mistakes, not just to set the record straight but also to show how Kavanaugh uses falsehoods to twist the law against voting rights....
When Supreme Court justices are valued for their political ideology and iconic victories of right-wing politics, the USA has lost it's third branch of the government. I hear that addicts of any particular type of substance, including alcohol, stop growth and development at the age a person became an addict. There was a question not asked of Kavanaugh during his confirmation, "Did you ever receive therapy for your alcoholism?"
I think having Brett Kavanaugh plagiarize political ideology into a Supreme Court decision should be a warning shot about what is going on in the Robert's Court. The exception for that is the Chief Justice himself who has heroically written to preserve the Majority Rule of the USA Constitution. I do believe the Chief Justice once openly corrected Gorsuch within the past year. Just sayin', it is time to examine Trump's justices for their ability to be loyal to the USA Constitution. Chief Justice Roberts may not alone be able to correct the course of the current Supreme Court members by his vote alone.
The Federalist Society along with it's obsession with judicial placement for it's own purposes must be investigated, especially in the face of Kavanaugh's obvious incompetency. He, like Bill Barr, was chosen for that incompetency. If one remembers right before Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination he was writing rather strange opinions. If there is going to be a majority of Justices writing strange and assaultive opinions against the US Constitution, then it and the Rule of Law is lost to anarchy. I think scrutiny of past and present opinions is very much in order for the purpose of our democracy and sincerely religious, civil rights, and cultural freedom.
end
