Get this:
I was reading about the Fort Myers' shooting of the teen nightclub:
July 29, 2016
...The shooter or shooters have not been arrested. (click here)
Fort Myers interim police Chief Dennis Eads told local media on Friday that at least of the wounded survivors have withdrawn their complaints, which might make it more difficult for police to investigate.
"I just would like to know what the thought is, why, they would not want to try and prosecute a person that could have very easily killed them," Eads told local media.
At least two of the injured, both 14, remain in the hospital.
I think that is strange. It is not just one person who withdrew their complaints. Being wounded is acceptable in the USA. Did the victims know the shooter? A peer?
The cases also breakdown along domestic terrorists with and without contact with war torn areas of the world. Those with contact of foreign countries where war is a long term problem are fairly young in their late teens and early twenties, ie: Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. The younger Tsarnaev brother is sentenced to death and is in US Marshall custody until the death sentence date is established.
Nadal Hasan is the exception to the killers, he was 39 when he killed at Fort Hood.
For those that were devoted to Islam this was a presentation by Hasan during his time with the USA military.
These writing by Hasan date back to before 2009 when he killed. Daesh, while organizing since 2003 with the invasion into Iraq, didn't declare a caliphate until 2014. The point is Hasan was stating a caliphate/islamic state was a priority to the religion long before 2014.
I think the precepts set down by Hasan in the research he presented to the USA military establishment is an aspect migrants, refugees and those seeking citizenship have to face as a potential hurdle to citizenship.
Hasan and the other killers of islamic extremism in the USA that have citizen status need to be examined for any evidence of divided loyalties. Early manhood is a problem for them when facing their new country with their religious freedom. Here in the USA, religious freedom has no question. Why are these young Americans so conflicted between the laws of the country, the value of human life and ancient precepts of a religion they are free to practice? I strongly believe these precepts that place young men in conflict with their citizenship and laws is the basis of many of these killings.
I believe there is also 'a guilt' about living and living a good life while not completely knowing or understanding the pain of living within their families still living overseas or their former homeland. There is something about the conflict of islamic precepts vs their comfort and freedom in the USA driving these attacks, be they bombs or bullets. There is a common basis for the violence and I think Hasan got it right while being caught up in his own moral dilemma as a Palestinian.
The cases also breakdown along domestic terrorists with and without contact with war torn areas of the world. Those with contact of foreign countries where war is a long term problem are fairly young in their late teens and early twenties, ie: Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. The younger Tsarnaev brother is sentenced to death and is in US Marshall custody until the death sentence date is established.
Nadal Hasan is the exception to the killers, he was 39 when he killed at Fort Hood.For those that were devoted to Islam this was a presentation by Hasan during his time with the USA military.
These writing by Hasan date back to before 2009 when he killed. Daesh, while organizing since 2003 with the invasion into Iraq, didn't declare a caliphate until 2014. The point is Hasan was stating a caliphate/islamic state was a priority to the religion long before 2014.
I think the precepts set down by Hasan in the research he presented to the USA military establishment is an aspect migrants, refugees and those seeking citizenship have to face as a potential hurdle to citizenship.
Hasan and the other killers of islamic extremism in the USA that have citizen status need to be examined for any evidence of divided loyalties. Early manhood is a problem for them when facing their new country with their religious freedom. Here in the USA, religious freedom has no question. Why are these young Americans so conflicted between the laws of the country, the value of human life and ancient precepts of a religion they are free to practice? I strongly believe these precepts that place young men in conflict with their citizenship and laws is the basis of many of these killings.
I believe there is also 'a guilt' about living and living a good life while not completely knowing or understanding the pain of living within their families still living overseas or their former homeland. There is something about the conflict of islamic precepts vs their comfort and freedom in the USA driving these attacks, be they bombs or bullets. There is a common basis for the violence and I think Hasan got it right while being caught up in his own moral dilemma as a Palestinian.
