The statement about Hilter happens to be true by the way. This is not a lesson in history unless it applies to the deterioration of an entire planet.
World War II’s greatest tragedy was to realize Hitler had risen to an angry and poor demigod equipped with military weapons unlike seen before including the Panzer Tank and missiles that would deliver bombs where normally man piloted planes only had that capacity. Bombs on rockets was a German invention. German scientists were far beyond the expectations of any war capacity otherwise. Maybe it is that which has caused the unfortunate turn away from science and even it’s ridicule at times. I think the statement goes, “We wouldn’t have had the atomic bomb without Einstein.”
It’s true.
Completely.
We also would not have had the Hydrogen Bomb without Edward Teller, who died at the age of 95 on the second anniversary of the World Trade Center attack.
September 11, 2003.
Teller died.
The difference between Einstein and Teller is that actual intent. Teller intended the H Bomb. Einstein was a physicist-theorist. He never intended for an Atomic Bomb. He discovered the potential of an atom. It took scientists with rocket knowledge to put that discovery on the end of a weapon delivery system.
Perhaps you haven’t noticed the weather hasn’t been the best. Perhaps you don’t understand how Human Induced Global Warming leads to Climate Change.
A quick review of definitions.
Weather is what happens daily in the way of temperature, precipitation, dew point; basically do I need my umbrella today or is there a darn good chance I’ll get stuck in the snow on the way to a destination. Weather is what Meteorologists predict everyday.
Climate is a long view of the HISTORY of weather. Climate is studied by climatologists. That knowledge is recorded in journals and referred to by meteorologists as a source of prediction.
Meteorologists at best offer short term outcomes. The only ability they have in terms of delivering information to the public regarding long range insight is through the knowledge of others.
That is a point of confusion with the people of this country.
There is no way the daily weatherperson can tell you whether or not you’ll survive Global Warming. All they can do is record and present a synopsis of daily occurrence as it is related to lives daily.
The Climate Prediction Center of the USA government deals ONLY with related Climate issues of that particular country. It does not have a ‘Global’ approach to anything. It’s focus is dictated by it’s budget and within that budget the focus is the impact on the USA.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/predictions/threats/threats.html
It isn’t as though they aren’t valuable, but, the above electronic page still only deals with the short term outcome and not the ULTIMATE outcome of Global Warming.
With that said, realize some short term outcomes as of recent are recorded below. Now ask yourself if these outcomes, if realized before hand, were planned to prevent.
The answer is clearly, no.
Why?
Why, if the Climate Prediction Center has a longer range view of weather is this not planned for or better yet, PREVENTED?
Why is Texas and Oklahoma on fire? Try the word negligence. Then realize the negligence in a longer view of Climate over time in respect to Global Warming.One of the satellites I posted showed clearly the extent to which the current drought stricken areas of the USA would receive rain. Relief so to speak. That satellite shows clearly the dominating factor of the ‘climate’ was more drought with no ‘natural’ relief to extinguish the fires.
So much for a merciful act of God. I am sure the residents affected will clearly state their lives have not been perfect and they somehow deserved it and therefore God’s wrath was delivered to them. That is hogwash. It is also oppression of anger. It is pandering to potential assistance with their plight.
It got news. If pandering is what the American Red States are seeking as a source of mercy by Bush then consider yourselves, ‘flat out of luck.’ It ain’t going to happen. This president and his cronies are DEAD set on finding and exploiting every drop of oil within their reach even if that reach causes the complete demise of the Arctic Ocean returning it to a completely watery state of being.
THAT.
Would be a huge mistake.
I don’t abide by the fact some defeatist scientists are stating the Global Warming we are experiencing is irreversible either. Their view of the world is limited. Grossly limited to their own understanding.
It also gives HUGE permission to continue the abuses of business.
The satellite I referred to will be the focus to the remainder of this entry and will be reviewed above.
