Monday, September 15, 2025

Vance wants controlled speech.

Wrong.

The MAGAs need to be behind bulletproof glass. 

Basically, that needs to be the new standard in this democracy. Every candidate without exception holds rallies and makes speeches from behind bulletproof glass.

In the case of assassins disguised as police or anyone else, identification and advance notice must proceed the arrival at the door.

If autoglass companies and utility workers can provide that level of ID and security of arrival so can police or anyone else coming to the door of any candidate or judge. 

We need political security legislation. This is all a no brainer.

People fired from their jobs because of their expression of a highly charged political speaker should be allowed redress. It is not possible to feel passionate about our democracy one day and turn it off the next. The folks that got in trouble weren’t calling for violence. They were in most instances defending our democracy. 

Mr. Kirk was reckless in some of the discussions that brought about feelings by others in feeling hated. He was also reckless with his is own safety. He was receiving death threats. He needed to be behind protective layers if security including bulletproof glass and magnetometers. Kirk was keeping company with Trump at the White House. Hello? 

Vance has no right to inhibit speech. If MAGAs are feeling guilty over the death of a 30 something it is their problem in their free wheeling judgement of other Americans. 

This situation needs mandatory security legislation with funding. There needs to be a huge return to civility and humanitarian values. The radical nature of MAGA is showing and they need to deal with themselves.